Overuse of antibiotics during COVID 19: WHO
/
1:48
/
MP4
/
132 MB

Edited News | WHO

Overuse of antibiotics during COVID 19: WHO

STORY: Overuse of antibiotics during COVID-19 - WHO

TRT: 1:48”

SOURCE: UNTV CH 

RESTRICTIONS: NONE 

LANGUAGE: ENGLISH / NATS 

ASPECT RATIO: 16:9 

DATELINE: 26 April 2024 GENEVA, SWITZERLAND 

 

  1. Exterior med shot: UN flag alley  
  2. Wide shot: speaker at the podium during press conference 
  3. SOUNDBITE (English) – Margaret Harris, spokesperson for the World Health Organization (WHO): “The advice was very clear right from the start. This was a virus. So it wasn't that that there was a guidance or recommendation that clinicians go in this direction. But perhaps because people were dealing with something completely new, they were looking for whatever they thought might be appropriate.”
  4. Med shot: Camera woman filming
  5. SOUNDBITE (English) – Margaret Harris, spokesperson for the World Health Organization (WHO): “The only time you would use antibiotics when you've got a viral infection is if you had a secondary, proven, bacterial infection that was sensitive to those antibiotics. So in other words, there were not being used appropriately. If you like the harm, the main harm, of course, is that if you are using antibiotics, you're unnecessarily you're increasing the likelihood of antimicrobial resistance to those particular antibiotics so that when you do need them for your bacterial infection, they are no longer so useful.”
  6.  Med shot: journalist behind screen
  7. SOUNDBITE (English) – Margaret Harris, spokesperson for the World Health Organization (WHO): “If you give somebody a medication that they don't actually need, you are always exposing them to an unnecessary risk. Every time you treat a person for any illness with any medication, a doctor will balance will this medication do the job and prevent whatever the disease is and is that a more important outcome than any of the potential risks.”
  8. Wide shot: Journalists in the press room with camerawoman and technicians behind screen  
  9. Med shot, journalist listening in press briefing
  10. Med shot, camerawoman filming

STORYLINE

Three out of four patients have been treated with antibiotics during the pandemic “just in case” they help: WHO

The World Health Organization (WHO) said on Friday that there was widespread misuse of antibiotics throughout the global COVID-19 pandemic that has potentially fuelled the propagation of antimicrobial resistance (AMR).

While only eight percent of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 had bacterial co-infections requiring antibiotics, three out of four patients were given them, “just in case” they helped.

“The advice was very clear right from the start. This was a virus. So it wasn't that that there was a guidance or recommendation that clinicians go in this direction,” said Dr Margaret Harris, WHO spokesperson, at a news briefing at UN Geneva. “But perhaps because people were dealing with something completely new, they were looking for whatever they thought might be appropriate.”

Antibiotic use ranged from 33 per cent for patients in the Western Pacific Region to 83 per cent in the Eastern Mediterranean and the African Regions. Between 2020 and 2022, prescriptions decreased over time in Europe and the Americas, while they increased in Africa.

The highest rate of antibiotic use was seen among patients with severe or critical COVID-19, with a global average of 81 per cent. In mild or moderate cases, there was a considerable variation across regions, with the highest use in the African Region, at 79 per cent.  

The only time you would use antibiotics when you've got a viral infection is if you had a secondary, proven, bacterial infection that was sensitive to those antibiotics,” said Dr. Harris. “So in other words, there were not being used appropriately. […] The main harm, of course, is that if you are using antibiotics, you're unnecessarily you're increasing the likelihood of antimicrobial resistance to those particular antibiotics so that when you do need them for your bacterial infection, they are no longer so useful.”

WHO said it was concerning that its study found that the antibiotics used had higher antimicrobial resistance potential than others that were available. 

“If you give somebody a medication that they don't actually need, you are always exposing them to an unnecessary risk,” explained Dr. Harris. “Every time you treat a person for any illness with any medication, a doctor will balance will this medication do the job and prevent whatever the disease is and is that a more important outcome than any of the potential risks.”

These findings are based on data from the WHO Global Clinical Platform for COVID-19, an anonymized clinical data from patients hospitalized with COVID-19. 

Data was collected from some 450. 000 patients admitted to hospitals for COVID-19 in 65 countries over a three-year period between January 2020 and March 2023.

The findings are being presented at the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Global Congress, taking place in Barcelona, Spain from 27 to 30 April. 

-ends- 

Teleprompter
and I've been
so
that's a
very
good
question.
The advice was very clear right from the start, this was a virus.
So it wasn't that that there was any guidance or recommendation that that
that, uh,
clinicians go in this direction.
But perhaps because people were dealing with something completely new,
they were looking for whatever they thought might be appropriate.
The only use time you would use antibiotics when you've got a viral infection
is if you had a secondary proven, uh,
bacterial infection that was sensitive to those antibiotics.
So in other words, they were not being used appropriately. And if you ate the harm.
The main harm, of course,
is that if you are using antibiotics, uh, you're
unnecessarily You're increasing the likelihood of antimicrobial resistance to
those particular antibiotics so that when you do need them
for your bacterial infection, they are no longer so useful.
If you give somebody a medication that they don't actually need,
you are always exposing them to an unnecessary risk.
Every time you treat a person for any illness with any medication,
AAA doctor will balance.
Will this medication do the job and,
uh,
prevent whatever the disease is And is that a
more important outcome than any of the potential risks?
Such the
best work,
the steps are all all of it.
Every and any individual can have allergic reactions, Or they can have.
It's a significant even
the G.