HRC53: SR Anais Marin - Belarus 04 July 2023
/
8:12
/
MP4
/
528.6 MB

Press Conferences | WHO

Bi-weekly Press Briefing 21 July 2023

 

PRESS BRIEFING BY THE UNITED NATIONS INFORMATION SERVICE

21 July 2023

 

Update on Dengue Outbreaks

 

Raman Velayudhan, Head of the Unit coordinating the dengue and arbovirus initiative, Global Program on Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization (WHO), said dengue was the most common viral infection that spread from mosquitoes to people. Most people who contracted dengue for the first time did not have symptoms, and most of those who did, recovered in one to two weeks. However, some people who contracted dengue repeated times had severe symptoms, and the death toll worldwide was high.

 

It was treated with medicines to lower the temperature and body pain, but there was no specific treatment. When there were outbreaks, dengue could draw precious resources from the health system, adding a further burden.

 

Dengue was spread by the Aedes species of mosquito. The disease was more common in tropical and subtropical climates. Its incidence had grown dramatically worldwide in recent decades. Cases reported to WHO had increased from half a million in 2000 to over 4.2 million in 2022, a more than eight-fold increase in two decades. The number of actual cases could be much higher. About half of the world's population was now at risk of dengue, with an estimated 100 to 400 million infections occurring each year.

 

The Americas region had reported 2.8 million cases and 1,280 deaths in 2022. This increasing trend was continuing in 2023, with already close to three million cases reported. The southern spread of cases in Bolivia, Paraguay and Peru was a growing concern.

 

In the European region, the Aedes mosquito was established in over 24 countries, which had reported dengue and chikungunya regularly since 2010.

 

In the Middle East, a high number of cases had been reported from Sudan, with 8,239 cases and 45 deaths since July 2022. In recent weeks, dengue cases had been reported in Egypt.  Trends in Asia were also worrying. Asia usually represented around 70 per cent of the global disease burden.

 

There are several factors driving this spread. These included increased movement of people and goods; urbanization and associated problems of water and sanitation; and continuing spread of the mosquitoes to more regions and countries. There were also issues linked to climate, such as high precipitation, increased temperature and water scarcity, which favoured mosquitoes' breeding. The virus and the vectors multiplied faster at higher temperature.

 

Several new tools were under development that provided greater hope in preventing and treating dengue, such as better diagnostics and antivirals under clinical trial.  One vaccine was in the market, and two were being trailed and reviewed.  Vector control tools included “Wolbachia” population replacement and population suppression models, the “sterile insect” technique and spatial repellents.

 

WHO was providing technical support to help countries respond to the outbreak and enhance cross-border exchange of information.  Community action was also needed for preventing mosquito breeding, raising awareness about dengue and encouraging those affected to seek medical care. WHO was also implementing an integrated strategy for control, with guidance for clinical management.

 

As the rainy season and El Niño commenced, there was a risk that Asian countries could experience a severe dengue outbreak. Dengue outbreaks usually happened around eight weeks after the monsoon season, so the next outbreak was coming soon. Health authorities were encouraging local agencies to reduce the breeding of mosquitoes.

 

WHO was working closely with countries in the Global Arbovirus Initiative to join forces to control some of the most burdensome diseases spread by mosquitoes. It was encouraging countries to focus on the most efficient actions to save lives and prevent disease.

 

In response to questions, Dr. Velayudhan said after the first wave of dengue in new areas, there was a possibility of 80 per cent of people having very mild symptoms. It was important to detect the first wave, as a few years down the line, there was a potential for more severe cases when future waves hit. Populations needed to be protected against those severe cases.

 

This was the beginning of the monsoon season, which had hit India as well as several other States. The stakes were high in India, with reports of dengue increasing. There was a need to prevent breeding by taking measures such as cleaning out stagnant water around houses. Such actions could reduce the number of cases.

 

Cases in Africa were a matter of concern.  The WHO Regional Committee for Africa had released the Framework for the Integrated Control, Elimination and Eradication of Tropical and Vector-Borne Diseases in the African Region. There were at least 200,000 cases per year reported in Africa. This year, there were already reports in countries such as Kenya and Sao Tome and Principe. Dengue in Africa had been masked by other diseases such as malaria in the past, but with the decrease in malaria, dengue cases were becoming more evident. There was a need to continue to improve detection mechanisms. 

 

Mosquitos with dengue bit during the day, so mosquito nets had limited effects. Other preventative measures such as spraying repellents needed to be taken in schools and homes. There was no direct drug intervention for dengue available yet, only medicines for reducing the effects of the disease. Tests needed to confirm the disease took two to three days. Governments needed to make rapid tests available and increase diagnostic capacities.

 

The vaccine for dengue on the market had been registered in 20 countries. It had three doses and worked well for people who had had the disease once. The vaccine had an average 65 per cent efficacy, varying depending on the variety of the disease.

 

On average, the highest number of confirmed deaths per year from dengue was around 6,000, but it was estimated that there the number was much higher, possibly around 40,000 to 70,000 deaths. The WHO hoped to reduce deaths further.

 

Climate change created excess rainfall, which led to more stagnant water in which mosquitos could breed.  This was a major challenge. Rainfall levels needed to be monitored and stagnant water removed. Mosquitos were able to hide in cooler areas to escape the heat during heatwaves. After the current heatwave, there would be rainfall, which would create more breeding sites for mosquitos. In communities where water was being stored, it needed to be covered well to prevent breeding.

 

Dengue had four closely related viruses. If you contracted one virus, you were immune from that virus for your lifetime. However, if you subsequently contracted other dengue viruses, you could potentially develop serious symptoms.

 

Body and clothing repellents, electronic mats, coils and long-sleeved clothing were effective in preventing mosquito bites. Mosquitos usually did not enter air-conditioned areas, and shutting windows and doors was also effective.

 

Historically, dengue started in 1953, with seven or nine Asian countries reporting dengue.  Since then, numbers had increased, with around 2.5 million cases reported in 2019.  More and more regions were now being affected, and WHO predicted around four million cases for this year. However, the number of cases would depend on what happened in the next six months.

 

There were plant-based repellents available, some of which were effective. Users needed to follow labels’ instructions for such products. Their effects lasted for shorter periods than chemical-based products.

 

Announcements

 

Alessandra Vellucci, Director of the United Nations Information Service (UNIS) in Geneva, said the UN Special Envoy for Syria, Mr. Geir O. Pedersen, would brief the Security Council on Monday, 24 July at 4 p.m. The briefing was currently scheduled as open, and a transcript would be delivered after the conclusion of the briefing.

 

The UN Food Systems Summit +2 Stocktaking Moment would also open on Monday, 24 July at 2:30 p.m. The high-level event would build on the momentum of the 2021 Food Systems Summit and create a conducive space for countries to review progress on commitments to action and identify successes, enduring bottlenecks and priorities in order to close the implementation gap for food systems transformation.

 

The three-day meeting in Rome would further highlight the central role of food systems transformations in overall advancement of the Sustainable Development Goals ahead of the SDG Summit in September 2023. The meeting would advocate for urgent action at scale, building on the latest evidence that sustainable food systems contribute to better and more sustainable outcomes for people, planet and prosperity, leaving no one behind.

 

The high-level opening ceremony would see the participation of the Prime Minister of Italy, the Director-General of the Food and Agriculture Organization, the President of the International Fund for Agricultural Development and the Executive Director of the World Food Programme.

 

More than 1,200 participants from 161 countries, including 19 Heads of States and Governments, 100 minister-level delegates and more than 450 Non-state Actor (NSA) delegates would attend the event. The main sessions would be broadcast on UN Web TV.

 

Ms Vellucci added that the Secretary-General held a briefing on 20 July to present to Member States a “New Agenda for Peace”. The briefing gave States a vision of multilateral efforts for peace and security, based on international law, for a world in transition.

 

The UN Office at Geneva had just published its annual report for 2022, which could be viewed on the UN Geneva website. The report presented an overview of activities occurring at UN Geneva in 2022. There was a chapter on communicating UN work and values. Ms. Vellucci thanked all journalists accredited to UN Geneva for their coverage of the Office’s activities last year.

 

Fionnuala Ní Aoláin, the UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, would hold a hybrid press conference on Friday, 21 July 2023 at 12 p.m. on returns and repatriations from conflict zones. Joining her would be Anne Charbord, Senior Legal Advisor of the Special Rapporteur.

 

The Committee against Torture was continuing its 77th session in Geneva, and would conclude its review of the report submitted by Spain this afternoon at 3 p.m.  Next Monday starting at 11 a.m., the Committee would hold a short, public meeting to discuss reports on follow-up to its concluding observations, on individual communications (complaints) and on reprisals against persons having collaborated with the Committee.  

 

The Human Rights Committee would meet on Monday, at 3 p.m., to adopt reports on the follow-up to it concluding observations regarding countries reviewed during previous sessions.

 

Also, on Wednesday, 26 July 2023 at 1:30 p.m., the Human Rights Committee would hold a hybrid press conference to present its findings on the reports of Brazil, Burundi, Colombia, Cyprus, Lesotho, State of Palestine and Uganda, which it has reviewed this session.  Speaking would be Committee Chair Tania María Abdo Rocholl and other Committee members.

 

Teleprompter
Thank you very much, Mr.
[Other language spoken]
Distinguished delegates, ladies and gentlemen, Since assuming this mandate five years ago, I have witnessed a steady deterioration of the human rights situation in Belarus, notably as repression reached unprecedented levels in 2020.
As I present my annual report today, let me reiterate that the situation remains catastrophic and fortunately, it keeps on worsening.
The Belarusian government amended an already restrictive legislation aimed at dismantling civic freedoms, leading to a surge in politically motivated prosecutions and sentencing.
The lack of accountability for human rights violations fosters a climate of fear among victims and their families, as the risk of retaliation for those turning to UN human rights mechanism remains ****.
We chose not to disclose the names of most of the victims.
Distinguished delegates statistics speaks volumes about the dire situation in Belarus.
More than 1500 individuals are still being detained on politically motivated charges, with an average of 17 arbitrary arrests occurring daily since 2020 this year.
So a notable increase in the practise of incommunicado detention which targets political opposition members and civil society activists who are currently behind bars.
I have good reasons to believe that prison conditions are deliberately made harsher for those sentenced on politically motivated grounds by placing them in punishment cells for petty infraction to prison rules.
Prominent political figures such as Sergey Tikhanovsky, Maria Kalesnikova and Victor Barbarica have suffered I'll treatment in these punishment cells, where they are systematically denied basic rights to medical examinations, proper treatment, legal representation and contact with their families.
Their cases are not isolated.
Human rights defenders face ongoing persecution too, hindering their vital monitoring and advocacy work.
The authorities have continued to harass and intimidate civil society activists, pushing unregistered associations to seize their activities or relocate abroad.
Over 1600 undesirable organisations have been forcibly dissolved, including all remaining independent trade unions.
As I document in my report, this illustrates A deliberate state policy of purging civic space of all its last dissenting elements.
This policy has effectively eradicated independent human rights defence groups from the Belarusian landscape.
This has complicated the work of international mechanisms established to monitor the human rights situation in the country.
The criminal prosecution of Viasna and its personnel, including Nobel Peace Prize laureate Alias Bilatsky, is a distressing example of this repression.
Women human rights defenders like Marfa Rapkova and Master Loika face dire detention conditions and inadequate medical care that leads to irreversible damage to their health.
The attacks on the legal profession have reached alarming levels as well.
Over 100 lawyers have been disbarred since 2020, which severely impacts the rights of defence and due process for victims of human rights violations.
Without effective legal counsel, they are denied their rights to a fair trial and access to justice and redress.
In fact, no one has been held accountable in Belarus for arbitrarily detaining 10s of thousands of peaceful protesters IN2020, nor for the violence or torture many of them have been subjected to.
This general impunity and the climate of fear resulting from ongoing repression have compelled hundreds of thousands of Belarusians into exile.
I commend the solidarity of countries that have welcomed them and urge others to do more to facilitate their legal stay and legitimate work in exile.
Excellencies, my report to the Council this year focuses on freedom of expression and highlights the continuing repression against independent media and trade unions and restrictions to academic freedom.
Independent media outlets have been labelled as extremist organisations without due process and banned, while journalists and media workers experienced raids, arrests and detentions.
10s of journalists and bloggers are serving lengthy prison sentences.
The authorities have restricted the informational space to state controlled media, while independent sources labelled as extremists face censorship and content blocking.
Academic freedom is systematically attacked in Belarus, with restrictions on research topics, appointments and publishing based on political loyalty, ideological control and disciplinary measures restrict freedom of opinion and their expression.
Academics critical of the government are discriminated against, harassed, discredited and dismissed from their workplace.
Dozens of my colleagues are now behind bars simply for sharing their analysis of the situation.
The crackdown on academic freedom leads to a brain drain, with many researchers and cohorts of promising students fleeing the country.
Primary and secondary education is also subject to ideological control, with mandatory classes on patriotism.
Children are discouraged from expressing their own opinions, especially on political issues.
Teachers, children and parents face threats and consequences for holding dissenting views.
The right to education for linguistic minorities is also being challenged with the closure of Polish language schools and restrictions on home schooling that particularly targets Belarusian speakers.
Finally, individuals face challenges to their freedom of opinion and expression when trying to speak out against the armed attack by Russia and Ukraine, or if they question Belarus's role in this aggression.
Objectives of conscience are not tolerated.
Anti war actions led to numerous detentions and arrests, some on charges of planning terrorist attacks, a crime which can now be punished by death.
The further expansion of capital punishment to crimes of **** treason is deeply concerning too.
Not only does it contradict international trends towards abolition, it is also inconsistent with earlier promises made by the government to open a public debate on death penalty in Belarus.
[Other language spoken]
President, two years ago I alerted the Council on the totalitarian turn taken by the Belarusian authorities.
The disregard for human life and dignity was evident during the crackdown against peaceful protesters in 2020.
There has been no prompt and thorough investigating investigation into the crimes committed then by law enforcement.
Instead, individuals associated with the victims or supporting them have been prosecuted in revenge.
The international community must continue gathering evidence of these human rights violations, particularly of the most serious crimes such as torture, summary execution, and forced disappearance and deportation, which could amount to crimes against humanity.
According to the last report of the OHCHR, examination of Belarus victims and their families deserve consideration and reparations.
Facilitating access to justice and ensuring accountability through universal jurisdiction is paramount to prevent future violations.
Hence, I continue to support the work of the **** Commissioner under this mandate, which is complementary to mine.
Ladies and gentlemen, amidst the ongoing crackdown, the international community should continue seeking engagement with the Belarusian government and advocate for human rights based solution to all those pressing issues.
I urge the international community to provide human rights defenders and civil society organisations with support to meet the identified needs of civil society both in exile and in country.
Finally, I must call upon the Belarusian authorities to fulfil their international human rights obligations.
Truth, justice and reparation for victims of human rights violations are necessary conditions for the country and its people to thrive in the future.
Though the challenges are immense, I have not lost hope that positive developments can and will take place in Belarus.
I thank all those who are dedicated to this cause, as our efforts contribute to also upholding international human rights standards.
I thank you for your attention and welcome your questions.