UN Geneva Press Briefing - 11 April 2025
/
1:24:19
/
MP4
/
4.8 GB
Transcripts
Teleprompter
Download

Press Conferences | OCHA , OHCHR , UN WOMEN , UNHCR , UNICEF , UNWOMEN , WFP , WHO

UN Geneva Press Briefing - 11 April 2025

DRC

UNICEF James Elder (From Goma)

  • Historic levels of child rape in eastern DRC, as violence rages amid a growing funding crisis

SUDAN

OCHA Jens Laerke (Press Room)

· Sudan 2-year mark

OHCHR Ravina Shamdasani (Press Room)

· Catastrophic cost of inaction as conflict approaches third year

UN WOMEN Sofia Calltorp (Zoom)

· Situation of women and girls in Sudan

WFP Leni Kinzli, WFP Communications Officer for Sudan (From Nairobi)

· Two years of war in Sudan

WHO Margaret Harris (Press Room) with Dr Shible Sahbani, WHO Representative in Sudan(From Cairo)

· Update on health issues and needs in Sudan

UNHCR Olga Sarrado (Press Room)

· Two years of war in Sudan - a devastating combination of record displacement and dwindling aid

OTHER TOPICS

WHO Margaret Harris (Press Room) with Dr Rik Peeperkorn (From Jerusalem)

· Update on the health situation in Gaza

OHCHR Ravina Shamdasani (Press Room)

· Gaza: Increasing Israeli “evacuation orders” lead to forcible transfer of Palestinians

· Myanmar: Continued attacks amid rescue efforts

UNHCR Celine Schmitt, UNHCR Spokesperson in Syria (From Damascus)

· UNHCR: Needs intensify as 400,000 Syrians return

UN GENEVA PRESS BRIEFING

11 April 2025

Alessandra Vellucci, Director of the United Nations Information Service in Geneva, chaired a hybrid briefing, which was attended by the representatives and spokespersons of the International Trade Centre, the United Nations Children’s Fund, the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, UN Women, the World Food Programme, the World Health Organization, and the United Nations Refugee Agency.

Potential Impact of United States Tariffs on Developing Countries

Pamela Coke-Hamilton, Executive Director, International Trade Centre (ITC), said the organisation had been following the impact of the United States tariffs on developing countries and their small businesses. On Wednesday, the United States announced a 90-day pause on so-called “reciprocal” tariffs on imports from most countries, bringing down rates to 10 per cent, while raising tariffs on imports from China to 145 per cent. China, meanwhile, had raised tariffs on imported United States goods to 84 per cent. Still in place were the Previous Most Favoured Nation rates and trade remedies, plus the new United States tariffs on steel, aluminium, automobiles, and Venezuelan oil.

ITC’s initial estimates, developed with the French economics research institute Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales (CEPII), calculated before the announcement of the 90-day pause and the additional tariff hikes on China, indicated that by 2040, the effect of the so-called “reciprocal” tariffs and initial countermeasures could reduce global GDP by 0.7 per cent. Countries like Mexico, China and Thailand—but also countries in Southern Africa—were among the most affected, alongside the United States itself.

Global trade could shrink by three per cent, with significant long-term shifts in trade patterns and economic integration. For example, exports from Mexico—which had been highly impacted—were shifting from markets such as the United States, China, Europe and even other Latin American countries, with modest gains instead in Canada and Brazil, and to a lesser extent, India. Similarly, Vietnamese exports were redirecting away from the United States, Mexico and China, while increasing substantially towards Middle East and North Africa (MENA) markets, the European Union, Republic of Korea and others. Thus, not all countries were affected by such changes equally.

Least developed countries, including Lesotho, Cambodia, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Madagascar and Myanmar, were most exposed to instabilities in the global trading system and least equipped to pivot as needed. The same went for small businesses in those countries, which did not have the capacity to absorb additional costs or to navigate such changes that their bigger counterparts did.

Some of these least developed countries relied heavily on the United States market for their exports, using preferences such as the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), which had allowed imports from Sub-Saharan African countries to enter the United States market duty-free since 2000.

Lesotho has been making use of AGOA, sending 60 per cent of its apparel exports to the United States market, exporting on average more than 230 million dollars in apparel a year over the past five years. Before the pause in “reciprocal” tariffs, Lesotho faced the highest rate of 50 per cent. A 50 per cent tariff would imply export potential losses of 210 million dollars in the United States market by 2029.

Bangladesh, the world’s second largest apparel exporter, would face a reciprocal tariff of 37 per cent, should it come into effect, which could lead to a loss of 3.3 billion dollars in annual exports to the United States by 2029.

It was easy to get caught up in daily or even hourly updates, but the situation presented long-term opportunities. A key part of the solution for developing countries to navigate any kind of global shocks was to prioritise diversification, value addition and regional integration. If ever there was a time to make this pivot, this was it. This “strategic reglobalisation” was characterised by mutually beneficial trade, rather than traditional development aid.

Diversification meant exploring new markets to sell to, to reduce reliance on one or two big trading partners. To absorb some of the losses on the United States market, for example, Bangladesh could explore European markets, which still held growth potential for its apparel. Lesotho could tap into alternative markets such as Belgium or Eswatini, where it held a combined unrealised export potential of 22 million dollars. While this would not compensate for the estimated losses, it was one way to blunt the full impact.

To achieve value addition, developing countries needed to move from selling commodities to focusing on in-country processing of goods before export. Value-added goods helped developing countries retain more value, so they were less affected by sudden drops in prices of coffee, cocoa or copper on global markets, for example. This was another way to improve overall resilience.

For regional integration, developing countries needed to look at their neighbours and choose to invest in trading relationships at the regional level. The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) was one example, with the potential to transform the way Africa traded within and with the rest of the world. If tariffs were fully eliminated, Côte d’Ivoire, for example, could increase intra-African exports by 25 per cent, partially compensating for the anticipated 563-million-dollar losses on the United States market.

There were opportunities for developing countries not just to navigate times of uncertainty, but to proactively prepare for the long haul.

In response to questions, Ms. Coke-Hamilton said there was no clarity yet regarding whether tariffs on Sub-Saharan African countries would be waived under the AGOA, and whether the AGOA would be renewed in September this year. Textiles and apparel manufacturers who utilised the AGOA Sub-Saharan Africa Programme had said that if they did not have a signal of renewal, they would not invest.

The AfCFTA could help address infrastructure issues in Africa to promote trade within and outside of Africa. The United States tariffs could fundamentally change how Africa traded, and this would have an impact on Africa as a whole.

Decisions to move a firm were multi-faceted. Businesses had to look at the cost of labour and inputs, as well as regulations and other factors. ITC was assessing the industrial capacity of developing countries and how much of that could be retrofitted or redirected to other markets. It was using its Export Potential Map to find opportunities that could be easily implemented. Viet Nam had a greater ability to switch to different markets than Lesotho, for example, which had two main exports, textiles and diamonds. ITC was supporting Lesotho to develop other sectors.

There were many agreements that were beneficial to least developed countries that had not been used in full due to supply-side constraints. ITC would work to help these countries address these. It was committed to determining the best method of helping least developed countries to navigate these treacherous waters.

Developing countries needed employment. In Sierra Leone, for example, there was 70 per cent unemployment. Everyone was excited about the potential of artificial intelligence on production, but getting people employed was the priority in these countries.

ITC had not been directly impacted by aid cuts but many of the countries it worked with had been impacted by the loss of programmes, which affected what was being asked of ITC.

This was not the first time there had been tremors in the world economic system, though this was a major one. It would not lead to the end of the system, but there would be readjustments in supply chains and reassessments of global alliances. The indeterminate extension of tariff pauses did not lend itself to stability. This would affect trade decisions over time.

China had increased its tariff on United States goods to 125 per cent just this morning. China and the United States constituted around three per cent of world trade; the remaining 96-97 per cent of trade would continue. However, there were many intermediate products that went through China and the United States, and it was unclear how these would be affected by the reciprocal tariffs.

Julia Spies, Chief of Trade and Market Intelligence, International Trade Centre (ITC), responding to questions, said supply chain adjustments took time, and in an environment with so much uncertainty, it was hard for firms to make such decisions. Measures such as preferential trade agreements offered growth opportunities that had not been used yet. There was demand for products in developing markets, and trade agencies could help developing countries tap into these opportunities.[1]

Situation of Children in Easter Democratic Republic of the Congo

 

James Elder, for UNICEF, speaking from Goma, highlighted the alarming escalation of violence against children in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), where reports indicate that a child was raped every half hour. Between January and February 2025, children represented 35-45 percent of the nearly 10,000 reported cases of sexual violence. Mr. Elder emphasized that this violence was not isolated but part of a systemic crisis, with survivors as young as toddlers. Sexual violence was being used as a weapon of war, destroying families and communities. Mr. Elder stressed the urgency of increased prevention efforts, survivor-centered services, and accessible reporting mechanisms. However, ongoing global funding cuts had severely impacted vital services, including medical care for survivors. Without additional funding, 250,000 children will miss crucial services, and future humanitarian assistance will be jeopardized. He called for immediate collective action to address these violations and support affected children.

Responding to questions, Ms. Elder emphasised that the crises were accumulating since last January. Consequently, the cost of supplies was raising and unfortunately the funding situation did not help in reducing the gap between the acute needs and the actual supplies provided. About the situation in Goma and in Bukavu, he stressed that it was very difficult for humanitarian workers and partners to operate, as the degree of uncertainty was great in the region with thousands of people displaced that were already on the margins.

Two Year from the Start of the Conflict in Sudan

Jens Laerke, for the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), stated that as the fighting in Sudan entered a third year with no viable peace in sight, the Sudanese were trapped in a humanitarian crisis of industrial proportions. Two out of three people needed aid – which was 30 million people. Civilians and aid workers were killed with impunity. Sexual violence was rampant. The health system was in tatters. Famine had taken hold in several places. And the entire region was struggling with the influx of millions of refugees. With more than 12 million of people displaced, 25 million who were acutely hungry, and 40 per cent of the population who needed urgent health assistance, Sudan was in dire need of a massive ramp-up of international support. Funding cuts would have a direct impact on the suffering of people. OCHA called on donors to get behind the organization's response which provided a protective shield against utter devastation for millions of people.

Ravina Shamdasani, for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), stated that UN Hugh Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk condemned the warring parties in Sudan for overseeing a “wholesale assault on human rights” amid global inaction, as the brutal two-year conflict continued to devastate lives. The conflict was driven not only by power struggles but by economic interests tied to gold, arabic gum, and livestock, which were fueling a war economy sustained through international trade. Violations of the arms embargo on Darfur and the proliferation of weapons were escalating the violence. Sexual violence remained widespread, with women and girls subjected to rape and exploitation. OHCHR reiterated its call to expand the arms embargo to all of Sudan and urged immediate international action.

The full press release is available here.

Marking the two years of conflict in Sudan, Li Fung, OHCHR Representative in Sudan, speaking from Nairobi, raised alarm over escalating hostilities and the grave protection risks facing civilians, particularly in and around El Fasher, where the RSF had intensified its siege and attacks, including on Abu Shouk camp, killing at least 10. OHCHR warned of expanding violence in Kordofan, Blue Nile, and Northern State, alongside persistent violations of international law, including ethnically motivated killings, attacks on civilian infrastructure, and sexual violence. In testimonies from refugees in Chad, victims described brutal atrocities, including rape, torture, and extrajudicial killings. OHCHR urged an end to the conflict and accountability for all human rights violations.

Sofia Calltorp, for UN Women, said that two years ago, the conflict in Sudan ignited a crisis now labeled as the worst humanitarian emergency in the world for women and girls. Today, more than six million displaced Sudanese women and girls faced daily threats to their safety and basic survival. In two years, the number of people at risk of gender-based violence, including sexual violence, had tripled to over 12 million. As half of the country’s population already faced hunger, women were especially vulnerable, often being the last to eat. Maternal deaths had risen alarmingly. Over the past two years, UN Women had partnered with more than 60 women-led organizations to reach over 15,000 women in some of Sudan’s most affected areas. Yet the needs were vast, and more funding was crucial. UN Women renewed the call for the conflict to end, as well as for the immediate cessation of all forms of gender-based violence, including sexual violence.

Full statement available here.

Leni Kinzli, World Food Programme (WFP) Communications Officer for Sudan, speaking from Nairobi, stated that today 25 million people, or one in two Sudanese, could not put food on their plates. Since the conflict started, the situation had been deteriorating, with famine being declared in 10 areas. WFP had provided food and nutrition aid to nearly 13 million people across Sudan. Each month, over three million people received food and nutrition assistance from WFP. It would be expanded to seven million people per month by mid-year. WFP urgently needed an amount of $650 million to reach the objective of assisting seven million people. Without swift action, WFP warned that millions of vulnerable people could be cut off from life-saving aid, placing fragile humanitarian gains at serious risk.

Press release can be found here.

Dr. Shible Sahbani, World Health Organization (WHO) Representative in Sudan, speaking from Cairo, said that the two-year war in Sudan had plunged the country into a humanitarian crisis of epic proportions marked by violence, displacement, hunger but also disease and death. A staggering number of 20.3 million people – over 40 per cent of the population – required urgent health assistance. Malnutrition was widespread with 3.7 million people in need of nutrition interventions. In Darfur, over 2.5 million displaced women and girls had no access to basic reproductive health services. In the last two years, WHO's work had enabled over one million people to be treated in health infrastructures; 75,000 severely acute malnourished children had received treatment; 11.5 million children had been vaccinated for polio and measles; and 12.8 million people had been vaccinated for cholera. The WHO 's work was essential but had been severely affected by funding cuts. It was time for a strong call on the partners to continue their support to WHO and to the people of Sudan.

Olga Sarrado Mur, for the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), warned that Sudan, now the site of the world’s worst displacement crisis, continued to suffer amid the lowest levels of humanitarian funding in decades. Two years into the brutal conflict, nearly 13 million people had been uprooted, including almost 4 million who had fled to neighbouring countries - half of them children. Displacement had surged while aid access remained fragile and perilous, with under 10 percent of required funds received for the regional response. Inside Sudan, reduced resources were cutting access to clean water and shelter, raising the risk of disease and further suffering. In neighbouring countries such as South Sudan, Chad, and Uganda, overcrowded camps, overstretched schools, and closed safe spaces were leaving refugees—especially women and children—vulnerable to exploitation, early marriage, and onward dangerous migration. With conflict lines shifting and prospects for peace dimming, UNHCR urged immediate support to sustain humanitarian operations and avert further regional destabilization.

Full statement available here.

Responding to questions, Olga Sarrado for UNHCR said that the majority of Sudanese refugees were living in neighbouring countries, many of them near to the border, in order to be able to go back home as soon as possible. A 28 per cent of those refugees had a secondary or university level of education and were hoping for good opportunities in the future after two years of conflict. Ms. Sarrado added that the funding cuts were worsening the humanitarian situation on the ground. It was possible that refugees would envisage departing towards developed countries for a better future.

Human Rights and Health Situation in Gaza

Ravina Shamdasani, for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), stated that the increasing issuance by Israeli Forces of “evacuation orders” had resulted in the forcible transfer of Palestinian in Gaza. While Israel, as an occupying power, could lawfully order the temporary evacuations of civilians in certain areas under strict conditions, the nature and scope of the evacuation orders raised serious concerns that Israel intended permanently to remove the civilian population from these areas, permanently displacing the civilian population within occupied territory, which was a grave breach of the Fourth Geneva Convention and a crime against humanity. Since 18 March, Israel had issued 21 “evacuation orders”. Between 18 March and 9 April 2025, there were some 224 incidents of Israeli strikes on residential buildings and tents for internally displaced people. In some 36 strikes about which the UN Human Rights Office had been able to corroborate information, the fatalities recorded so far were only women and children. There was also an alarming trend of targeting and killing Palestinian journalists. Intentionally directing attacks against civilians not taking a direct part in hostilities constituted a war crime. All parties should be entirely focused on achieving a ceasefire, rather than seeking to justify the prolongation of senseless violence.

Full statement can be found here.

Dr. Rik Peeperkorn, for the World Health Organization (WHO), speaking from Jerusalem, informed that stocks of medical supplies and equipment were running critically low and making it a challenging to keep these hospital supplies amid a rising violence. All types of medical supplies (medication, assistive devices, surgical tools, consumables, oxygen stations, etc.) were critically low in stock. WHO was waiting for 158 metric tons of supplies worth 2.3 million dollars to be released and sent to Gaza. Another 36 tons of supplies arrived in Dubai, waiting for the opening of the humanitarian corridors. Since 18 March, only 28 staff had been able to enter Gaza; the number of international emergency medical teams deployed had decreased from 97 to 68. In addition, medical evacuations were extremely slow while 10,000 to 12,000 patients in Gaza were in urgent need of evacuation for urgent care.

Answering questions, Dr. Rik Peeperkorn (WHO), explained that since the end of the ceasefire, there was a clear shortage of medical supplies in Gaza due to blockades at the entry of the territory. Medical supplies were now rationed. WHO focused on saving lives and reduce morbidity. The organization called for the blockade to be lifted. Adding to this acute situation, hospitals and medical facilities in Gaza were barely functional, which resulted on very few people enabled to receive surgical and medical treatments despite their very severe condition. He added that a ceasefire was needed for enabling new rounds of Polio vaccine campaign, so as to reach the rate of 95 percent of vaccinated population which was needed for fully covering the Gazan people.

Continued Attacks and Rescue Efforts in Myanmar

Ravina Shamdasani, for OHCHR, noted that today, Friday, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk had called for immediate and unrestricted humanitarian access to all affected areas following the deadly earthquake in central Myanmar. While both the Myanmar military and the National Unity Government announced a pause in hostilities, High-Commissioner Türk urged a halt to all military operations, emphasizing the importance of focusing on humanitarian assistance. Reports from the UN Human Rights Office indicated that, despite the ceasefire, the Myanmar military continued operations, including airstrikes and conscription of civilians aiding rescue efforts. The military's longstanding restrictions on humanitarian access had left many areas, including Sagaing, Bago, and Shan State, without relief efforts. Mr. Türk highlighted the catastrophic situation in these regions, exacerbated by an information blackout and a lack of essential supplies such as clean water, food, and medicines. He stressed that international assistance had to reach affected communities through coordinated efforts, and called for the release of political prisoners, as well as a shift towards an inclusive political solution that would uphold human rights and democracy.

Press release is available here.

Needs of Refugees Returning to Syria

Celine Schmitt, United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR) Spokesperson in Syria, speaking from Damascus, said that some 400,000 Syrians had returned from neighbouring countries since the fall of the Assad regime on 8 December 2024, according to estimates by the Agency. During the same period, more than one million internally displaced people within Syria had also moved, bringing the total number of Syrians who had gone home to over 1.4 million. Without adequate funding, however, the 1.5 million returns projected for this year might not happen, and those who would return, would have no other choice but to leave again. The severe funding cuts that UNHCR was facing were putting millions of lives at risk in Syria, where about 90 per cent of the population required some form of humanitarian assistance. Without additional funding, the Agency would only be able to help a fraction of those who intended to go back, meaning fewer returning home. Despite these difficult and unprecedented times, UNHCR was committed to staying and delivering in Syria and was dedicated to work closely with UN agencies including WFP, IOM, UNDP and UNICEF.

Answering questions, Celine Schmitt stressed that after 8 December 2024 around 80,000 people left Syria. After the events that took place in Syrian coastal areas last March, an estimated number of 30,000 people left the country to reach Lebanon.

Full statement can be found here.

Announcements

Alessandra Vellucci, for the United Nations Information Service, informed on behalf of the World Trade Organization (WTO) that the upcoming embargoed WTO hybrid press conference on the “Global Trade Outlook and Statistics” would take place on 16 April at 2 pm Geneva time in Room D of the WTO building. The embargo would lift at 3 pm on the same day. The press conference would feature Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala and Chief Economist Ralph Ossa. An embargoed copy of the report and news item would be available on the WTO online media newsroom at noon of the same day. Registration to attend the press conference in person or virtually could be requested to mediateam@wto.org.

***


[1] For the latest updates on tariffs, the ITC Market Access Map tracks new trade measures around the world. To identify a country's exposure to a particular market, the ITC Trade Map shows, for example, how much of a country’s products is traded with the United States, or any other country. ITC monthly Trade Briefs unpacks the latest trade trends, showing how tariffs affect countries, but also specific parts of the global economy. The ITC Export Potential Map shows which products have the most potential for increased exports for a particular country.

Teleprompter
So thank you very much for staying with us.
Let's continue the regular briefing of the information service here in Geneva.
We have a extremely long briefing today and an important one with many, many important topics.
[Other language spoken]
James is in Goma on the go.
We hope the connection will be good and he has a terrible story to tell.
So I'll I'll give him the floor straight away and then we will go to an interagency briefing on the two year mark of the Saddam war.
[Other language spoken]
[Other language spoken]
[Other language spoken]
Violence against children is defining the conflict in the east of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Initial reports show that thousands of children have been subjected to **** and sexual violence in just two months.
As communities are ripped apart by conflict and attacks on children, the rate of sexual violence against children has never been higher.
Early reports show that children make up between 35 to 45% of the nearly 10,000 cases of **** and sexual violence reported to protection actors in just January and February of this year.
In short, based on initial data from these GBV actors in the east of the DRC, during the most intense phase of this year's conflict in eastern DRCA, child was raped every 30 minutes.
We're not talking about isolate, isolated incidents.
We are talking about a systematic crisis.
We are seeing survivors as young as toddlers.
It's a weapon of war and a deliberate tactic of terror, and it destroys families and communities.
Now, the fact that this may just be the tip of the iceberg, hidden beneath layers of fear and stigma and insecurity should shake us to the core.
Certainly, it should compel urgent action and and collective action.
Now, what should that action look like?
OK, we need additional prevention efforts, survivor centred services and safe, accessible ways for survivors to report ***** without fear.
Survivors must see the world stand with them, not turn away, and perpetrators must face justice now.
As with all prevention efforts, funding is key and the children of the DRC have not been spared from the consequences of the global funding crisis.
In just one of the hospitals I visited, 127 survivors of **** had no access to the post exposure prophylaxis kits.
That is a direct consequence of rapid funding cuts.
These girls and women are enduring the most unimaginable horrors and they are no longer getting even the most basic medical care that they need.
And so the story that a brave little 13 year old girl shared with me 13, of her ****, of not understanding how she could be pregnant, of having a caesarean because of her tiny body, that story will be repeated time and again.
In her own words, I am a girl able to fill the funding gap left after programmes were terminated.
James, sorry, the last sentence you've been cut.
Sorry, you said the story is I'm a girl and then you were cut.
Sorry.
[Other language spoken]
It was of her ****, of not understanding how she could be pregnant, of having to have a caesarean because her body is so tiny.
That story without funding, without the prophylactics kits, will be repeated time and again.
In this little girl's own words.
I am a girl, I don't know how to be a mother now.
If UNICEF is unable to fulfil the funding gap left after programmes were terminated for key humanitarian services, 1/4 of a million children here will miss out on vital services for gender based violence and protection.
We have 12 weeks and of course the funding crisis goes beyond supporting children who are survivors of grave violation and at risk of recruitment into armed groups.
How bad will it get for children in the DRC without funding?
In 2026 alone, our projections are that 100,000 girls and boys will miss out on the visas vaccinations, Almost 2 million will not be screened for malnutrition, almost half a million will be left without safe water.
The dire numbers, they go on and on across DRC, across the world.
But these aren't just numbers.
Behind everyone is a child.
It's a scared, hungry, vulnerable child and a family, a community doing everything they possibly can to keep that child alive.
The point is, the cost of inaction is not abstract.
It's measured in preventable suffering and lost futures.
Safeguarding services, of course, is doubly important in the DRC as humanitarian funding has strengthened health systems.
All those hard earned gains, child and maternal mortality, malnutrition, prevented immunisation coverage, access to education, birth registration, they are all now at risk of unravelling.
And of course in our deeply interconnected world, such consequences, they're not going to remain confined to borders.
The DRC has been the epicentre of several outbreaks with global implications.
[Other language spoken]
Let me close with what gives me hope.
The children, the social workers, the youth, the help.
[Other language spoken]
They're bright.
They're relentless.
They mobilise communities to go to vaccinations.
They get online to dismantle dangerous fake news, even when platforms roll back efforts to protect the truth.
The health staff.
The health staff who stayed with survivors of violence and with mpox patients, even as chaos spreads, prisons empty and police disappeared.
The skilled and compassionate social workers, rooted in the community, who are the backbone of UNICEF's response.
Day by day, they accompany survivors, stitching together safety, dignity and justice.
They guide child **** support, support survivors from trauma to healing with unwavering care.
And of course, the survivors of ****, the children refusing silence, telling me plainly, if we stay quiet about ****, there is no justice and we don't heal.
What they all need, health workers, social workers, children is one thing.
It's opportunity.
[Other language spoken]
But for opportunity to to light real change, it has to come with peace and it has to come with funding.
Thank you, James, thank you for this briefing.
[Other language spoken]
I mean, I think it's more than heartbreaking is is unacceptable.
Thank you for this.
I'm seeing already in the chat people are asking if you can send your notes because you've given also numbers and this atrocious figure of one child raped every 30 minutes in DRC.
I'll open the floor to questions.
Catherine.
[Other language spoken]
Hello James, I have a question regarding the place you are and if I'm not mistaken you in Goma, how did you get there?
How is it, how are you working there?
Because as far as, if I'm not mistaken, this city and the region are occupied by M23 forces and militaries from Rwanda.
[Other language spoken]
And if you could tell us a little bit more about the way you got there?
Because if I'm not mistaken, the airport is closed.
Or did you go through Kigali and then took the road?
Thank you so much, Heather.
Hi there.
[Other language spoken]
[Other language spoken]
Yeah, for for me, yes, Kigali and by Rd most of your question is so important though in terms of how the supplies get here.
And that's what's even more critical this these crises are colliding.
If we go back to January in terms of mpox, nutritional crises, crises around water, and then all of a sudden on top of that you have the violence of late January, the insecurity of now and an unprecedented funding crisis.
That's what UNICEF, that's what our partners rather agencies, that's what health workers, mums and children are the airport.
James, sorry you were cut again.
Can you repeat your last sentence?
Sorry, we knew it would be difficult.
Just the last sentence please.
Of course, sorry, supplies is the critical one.
How do they get here?
That's more expensive, it's more difficult.
So we have a funding crisis and we have a greater cross cost of supplies.
Now let's be clear, we are very, very grateful for partners like Cedar and Echo and FCDO who are trying to step in.
But right now the gaps, the grabs, the gaps in funding are life threatening.
And you are right to point out the difficulty of reaching.
[Other language spoken]
I've been in Kavu, so North and South of Lake Kivu.
It's a very difficult place for partners to work.
As I say, I met many health staff whose family left and who stay and at night time there are no police, the prisons are empty, there is no one on the streets.
I spoke to a child psychologist herself who spends every day talking to child **** survivors, who has had her own her own home broken into.
These are the people that funding supports.
And I think that's the message we're trying to show that that this is not about handouts.
This is about, you know, those people who stay behind.
This is about how how we as an international community will be remembered.
This is not about charity, it's about principle and it's about the progress.
These people are not looking for handouts, They are looking for assistance.
As a, as a health worker said to me at an M Box clinic, look, I will keep coming here and they've strengthened their system.
I will keep coming but I cannot do this without vaccines.
I I met a sweet little 12 year old boy in an MBOX clinic.
Imagine the fear of these children.
They don't know the disease.
The disease.
The burning sensation is intense and horrific.
He's meeting everyone in that suit.
And this little boy, though, he's going home because of the care he got because of the vaccines, because of the donor support.
So much of that donor support was from the United States.
Because of that, this little boy, having been through so much, had a twinkle in his eye.
[Other language spoken]
That's not going to be the case when these clinics run out of vaccines and the medical supplies they need for MBOX.
Thank you very much, Isabel.
[Other language spoken]
Thank you very much, James, for this briefing from Burma.
I would like to know if these cases of **** again sexual violence against children are concentrated in.
I would like to you to either identify which in which regions are this case is concentrated and also if you can talk a little bit more of what is, what are these prophylaxis kids, you know to, to make people understand what we are talking about.
Why are they, are they so important?
In what terms are not no longer available as you said and you mentioned these cases of that 100, seven, 127 children that don't have access.
But I suppose the problem is larger than that.
If you can just explain a little more.
Yeah, about this.
[Other language spoken]
Yeah, sorry.
I just heard lost lost the last bit when you said 127.
Yeah, you you mentioned that about the global cuts, for example, that one you you visited a clinic where you this is what I wrote about.
[Other language spoken]
Where are you there in this clinic there is more than one hundred 127 victims that don't have access to this exposure prophylaxis kids or some yes exactly So what is why this is this is so important and also how how is the situation now is this situation?
I mean I don't know how to say but getting better you know there there is now that the the this rebel forces are in control of the place.
These things are more stable in some way for, for civil, yes, I mean, thanks, Isabel.
[Other language spoken]
So yes, all these, all the data I've been sharing with you, all the initial reports are coming from the east.
So the east of the of the DFC where the violence broke out again in late January.
The prophylactics kits are so important because, because they're used to prevent HIV exposed HIV infection after potential exposure, so after a ****.
So they are just a fundamental kit as part of that recovery for, for the horrors that these children endure, just all that.
And they, they are, it is very, it's very hard to explain how brave these children and they are children, how as they tell their stories.
At one point when I spoke with them, I was in a room and the room went completely dark because of the power cut out.
And so all I could hear was it was their voices.
And they were just the voices of little girls.
That's who this is happening to.
So the prophetic kids are a very important part to, to try and start their recovery.
This child psychologist at UNICEF trains.
Heaven sent extraordinary people, things getting better.
Look, there is a great degree of uncertainty here.
You've had hundreds of thousands of people displaced.
They were already on the margins.
When we say people have nothing, we refer to, as I've seen many times, a girl, a grandmother with her hands out who's clearly emaciated, looking for food.
They have nothing.
And then they were displaced and they return home to find their home occupied or burnt down, or their crops destroyed, or if they are to start again.
The insecurity, Isabel, means how do they start again?
Do they know that in three months that they'll be able to continue with a crop?
So that level of insecurity because of the ferocity of what people endured is very, very real.
That's the environment my colleagues work in.
That's the environment my part, our partners work in there.
We are very much a stay and deliver.
But as so many doctors and psychologists told me, we will stay and deliver, but we have to be able to deliver with the the medicines, the care, the nutritional supplies, the water that, you know, these, these children we serve need.
That's the the complication, the crisis we've never seen before, brave people in an active conflict with a disease outbreak and suddenly a funding crisis that is very much new terrain for the DRC and for many other countries.
[Other language spoken]
Thanks for being with us in conditions that we know are not easy.
And thanks for bringing this atrocious story.
We need to talk about this, really good luck with your work and stay safe.
And I like now to move to the next big topic on our agenda.
As you all know, we are approaching the third year of the other terrible conflict in Sudan and we really want to speak out on on this dire anniversary.
We have with us a series of colleagues.
We will listen to all of them and then I will open the floor to questions.
We will have Yens for Archer telling us about the overall situation.
Then human rights here with Ravina.
And I don't know if you received the update, but we also have Lee Fongo, who is the representative of the OHHR in Sudan, and Sophia Caltrop that as you know, is here.
Normally she's the director of the Human Women Women Office here in Geneva, but at the moment she is reaching out by Zoom to tell us about women and girls in Sudan.
Lenny Kinsley from Nairobi to tell us about the food situation.
Then we have Margaret with Doctor Shible Sarbani who will tell us about the health situation, and Olga on the situation of refugees.
So let's start this.
I'd like to ask everybody to be brief if possible, so that we have time for questions.
Yes, thank you, Alessandra.
Good morning everyone.
It is a lot of briefers, so we will be as short as we possibly can.
Let me start with some overall numbers and and messages from our side as the fighting in Sudan enters a third year with no viable peace insight.
The Sudanese are trapped in a humanitarian crisis of industrial proportions.
2 out of three people need aid.
That's 30 million people.
Civilians and aid workers are killed with impunity.
Sexual violence is rampant.
The health system and tatters.
Famine has taken hold in several places and the entire region is struggling with the influx of millions of refugees in hard numbers.
[Other language spoken]
More than 12 million people have been displaced, 25,000,000 are acutely hungry, 40% of the population need urgent health assistance, most of Sudan is ravaged by various diseases and at least 84 aid workers have been killed trying to address these needs.
This of course, demands a massive ramp up of international support.
What we see instead is donors pulling back funding across the world.
If you're looking for an example of of where these deep funding cuts hurt people most, keep eyes on Sudan.
We know how to stem the suffering though.
But the parties to the conflict and the rest of the world need to show the will.
Attacks on civilians must cease immediately.
Perpetrators of violations of international law must face justice.
Conflict parties must ensure safe and predictable access to all people in need.
Local organisations, the implementers on the ground, need to be protected and supported.
Member States must bring real pressure on the parties to reach an immediate cessation of hostilities and work towards the lasting peace.
And for as long as that is not achieved, we call on donors to get behind our response, which provides A protective shield against utter devastation for millions of people.
[Other language spoken]
Thank you very much.
Has set out so starkly, the catastrophic cost of inaction is unbearably clear.
As the conflict in Sudan approaches it's third year, warring parties in Sudan are overseeing a wholesale ******* on human rights amid global inaction.
As hostilities have expanded in reach and intensity over the past year, the lives and hopes of so many Sudanese have been uprooted and caught in a mire of death, deprivation and suffering.
Two years of this brutal and senseless conflict must be a wake up call to the parties to lay down their weapons and for the international community to act.
The sustained conflict is not merely a power struggle.
It is significantly influenced by economic and business interests of national and international actors in key sectors such as gold and agricultural commodities.
Revenue generated from international trade in Sudan's gold, gum Arabic and livestock has become the financial backbone of the war economy.
Proliferation of arms and continued weapon supplies, including to the western Darfur region where UN Security Council arms embargo is in place, are also compounding the fighting, enabling violations of international law and undermining peace efforts.
All those involved in facilitating the transfer of arms and military material to Darfur must stop in compliance with the embargo.
We call again for the arms embargo to be expanded to cover the whole of Sudan.
[Other language spoken]
Women and girls have been raped, gang raped, sexually exploited and abducted for sex on a large scale since the conflict began.
The head of our Sudan office will brief you on this issue based on our interviews with victims.
And she will also speak to you on the heightened concerns for civilians in North Darfur state in Khartoum and growing concerns about expansion to new areas.
Over to Lee Fong, please.
[Other language spoken]
[Other language spoken]
[Other language spoken]
[Other language spoken]
The 2nd anniversary of the conflict in Sudan comes amid serious concerns for the protection of civilians in various parts of the country as hostilities intensify and expand in and around little fascia.
The RSF has tightened its long standing siege, worsening the already dire humanitarian situation amid fears of an imminent major offensive.
Just yesterday, the RSF launched an attack on Unka Dada locality in West to the West of El Fascia and heavy artery shilling on Abu Shock IDP camp killing at least 10 civilians.
This comes as civilians in El Fascia have been and surrounding IDP camps have been urged to leave by the RSF and allied groups.
There are also growing concerns about the hostilities escalating and expanding to new areas, including in Kodafan, Blue Nile and Northern State, and the devastating impact for the civilian population who have already endured 2 years of conflict.
The conflict continues to be marked by complete disregard for the laws of war and for international human rights law, with persistent attacks on populated areas and critical civilian infrastructure, such as health facilities, power plants, and water stations, and obstruction of humanitarian assistance.
Retaliatory attacks and summary killings of people suspected of collaborating with opposing forces remain a serious concern.
Such attacks, which are often ethnically motivated, have continued unabated, fanned by hate speech and incitement to violence, particularly on social media.
As UN Human Rights reported last week, in the aftermath of the recapture of Khartoum by the Sudanese Armed Forces, civilians have been brutally killed on suspicions that they were collaborating with Rapid Support Forces.
Our team has documented the extrajudicial killing of close to 100 civilians, but actual numbers are likely higher.
One woman who was stopped by self affiliated militia as she was fleeing Khartoum had said please don't **** us based on identity.
We are not the enemy in Darfur.
Recently our team travelled to eastern Chad and gathered over 160 testimonies from men, women, boys and girls who had fled the conflict and violence in North and West Darfur.
The horrific violations and abuses which we had documented through interviews since 2023 continue unabated.
Victims and witnesses recounted towards ethnically targeted attacks by the RSF on villages in North and West Darfur based on the ethnicity of the inhabitants and extrajudicial killings, sexual violence, arbitrary arbitrary detention and torture.
The accounts of sexual violence and patterns of **** and gang **** were particularly horrific.
Numerous survivors of violence in West Tar 4 in 2023 had only been able to flee recently as they had been held by the RSF in conditions amounting to sexual slavery.
One survivor recounted that she was told we are your men now before RSF fighters raped her in front of her children.
The brutal conflict must end.
The people of Sudan deserve better and aspire to a future where the human rights of all are protected and upheld.
[Other language spoken]
Thank you very much, Liefung.
And as you were speaking about the situation of women and girls, let me go to Sophia Caltrop.
Sophia, can you tell us where you are at the moment and what is the situation of women and girls that you're seeing?
Thank you very much, Alessandra.
I'm actually on my way to Sudan and I will land in Port Sudan tomorrow morning.
Very much to, to, to talk to the women and girls that we have also heard from OHEH are are bearing the very brunt of this conflict.
And I look forward to to come back to you from Port Sudan.
So, as we have heard, almost two years ago, on April 15, the conflict in Sudan ignited a crisis that is now labelled the worst humanitarian emergency in the world for women and girls.
And since then, the toll on their lives, livelihoods and their dignity has intensified beyond measure, and women and girls are now once again suffering the worst of the consequences.
Today there are more than 6,000,000 displaced Sudanese women and girls and they face daily threats to their safety and basic survival.
As we have heard from my colleagues and in just two years, the number of people at risk of gender based violence, including sexual violence, has tripled and now it's over 12 million.
Those statistics, as shocking as they are, are only a scratch on the surface.
Many survivors of conflict related sexual violence never report their experiences for fear of stigma and retaliation.
The weaponisation of sexual violence against women and girls in Sudan.
It must stop and perpetrators must face justice and we are working together with OHEHR and others to to to work towards that.
As half of the country's population already face hunger and the food security crisis increasingly worsen, women are especially vulnerable, often being the last one to eat because of social norms that make them more vulnerable.
And they're more limited financial resources and social support.
With 80% of hospitals in conflict areas not functioning, maternal deaths have risen alarmingly and 80% of the displaced women and girls in Sudan lack access to clean water.
These numbers, they are not just statistics, they are stories of profound suffering and urgent need of each and every woman, as we have heard.
And that is why I am, as said, are on my way to Sudan in the coming days to hear from the Sudanese women who have displaced extraordinary resilience in those difficult circumstances.
The Sudanese women, they have stepped forward as frontline responders, as peace builders and as advocates for the communities despite being excluded from the initial peace negotiations.
Amplifying woman's voices in every peace negotiation and in every humanitarian decision making space is an imperative for a just and lasting peace and for effective and principled humanitarian action.
Over the past two years, Human Women has partnered with more than 60 women LED organisations all over Sudan to reach over 15,000 women in some of the country's most affected, most hard to reach areas, providing access to safe shelter, to mental health care and to legal aid, while also gaining access to key spaces to have their voices heard in local and international arenas.
Yet the need are vast and as Jan said, more funding is crucial to support women and girls of Sudan.
So as the conflict now reaches its two year mark, we renew our hope for its end to come, as well as the immediate cessation of all forms of gender based violence, including sexual violence.
So those ongoing transition remains very complex, but recent efforts by the government to restore security in parts of the country, including Khartoum demonstrate slight potential for progress.
And moving forward, it is imperative to bolster this gain by safeguarding human rights and prioritising the prevention of all form *****, particularly against women and girls in both return and IDP areas.
Sudanese women and girls, they deserve so much more than survival.
They deserve the dignity, the resources and the opportunities to rebuild their lives and their nation.
When women are centred in recovering peace building, the entire communities heal.
So for us, let us now see how we can support the women and girls in Sudan in this very crucial moment.
Thank you very much, Alessandra, and over to you.
Thank you very much Sophia, and all the best for your trip.
You're spoken about the situation of food, and we'll hear more of this by Lenny Kinsley, whom you have already heard from and who's the WFP communication officer for Sudan.
She's calling in from Nairobi.
Lenny, thanks for being with us.
[Other language spoken]
[Other language spoken]
Two years ago, even before the war started in Sudan, WFP was warning about record levels of hunger across the country.
No one could then imagine what was about to happen to millions of Sudanese.
After just a month of war, hunger in Sudan hit yet another record ****.
A year later, WFP's executive director warned that Sudan risk becoming the world's largest hunger crisis.
Then famine was confirmed in August last year in Zamzam camp and a few months later spread to 9 more locations.
Each time, WFP's worst fears have been confirmed as fighting has escalated and the humanitarian response has been repeatedly undermined by intentional obstruction by the parties to the conflict.
Today, 25 million people, or one in two Sudanese, cannot put food on their plates.
Two years of war has turned Sudan into the world's largest hunger catastrophe and famine is spreading.
Since the conflict started, WFP has provided food and nutrition aid to nearly 13 million people across all states of Sudan.
We launched a major surge in food aid late last year and have made breakthroughs in delivering food, cash food or cash assistance to areas that had been largely cut off, including in Greater Khartoum, Jazeera State, Darfur and the Kordofan regions, some of which had not received any food since the start of the war.
We are now providing food and Nutrition Assistance to over 3 million people each month and are pushing to expand this to 7 million people on a monthly basis.
WFP assistance helped to reduce the risk of famine in six areas in Central Darfur and two areas in West Darfur, where nearly 1,000,000 people have received regular WFP food or cash aid since June 2024.
But the gains are fragile and they are just a fraction of the needs.
I have seen first hand what food assistance means for families on a recent trip to eastern Sudan.
It means that a father who has been torn from his home in Khartoum can feed his family of four.
It means that a mother in an IDP camp in Casula can cook a simple meal for her young daughters and so that they don't fall into malnutrition.
These food supplies are not just cooking ingredients, they are giving families hope that they can overcome the worst impacts of this horrific conflict.
Once again we find ourselves at a tipping point.
The rains which start in June will make many routes impossible.
So we are yet again in a race against time to pre position food assistance close to populations in need.
We urgently need two things to be able to do this.
The first is access.
We need to be able to quickly move humanitarian assistance to where it is needed, including through front lines, across borders and within contested areas, without lengthy bureaucratic processes or clearance procedures.
The second thing we need is funding.
For the next 6 months, we require 650 million U.S.
dollars to reach the 7 million people per month that we are planning to reach.
Without swift action, WFP is warning that millions of vulnerable people could be cut off from life saving aid, placing flat, fragile humanitarian gains at serious risk.
[Other language spoken]
Thank you for for briefing us and appeal heard.
And as you spoke about food, we also heard about the vulnerable conditions of health of the health system and they're beneficiaries.
So I'll go to Doctor Shible Sabani, who is calling in from Cairo and who's The Who representative in Sudan.
Doctor, you have the floor.
[Other language spoken]
Good morning, colleagues.
[Other language spoken]
Yes, as my colleagues said, 2 year war in Sudan has plunged the country into a humanitarian crisis of epic proportions marked by violence, displacement, hunger, but also diseases and deaths, which makes Sudan crisis also a health crisis.
So 20.3 million people, which is over 40% of the population of Sudan that require urgent health assistance.
The health system is devastated, living million without health care.
2/3 of Sudan, 18 states.
They report at least two concomitant disease outbreaks.
As you know, Sudan is facing 5 disease outbreaks including malaria, dengue, measles and cholera.
The latter cholera took already over 1500 lives.
Malnutrition is widespread with 3.7 million people in need of nutrition interventions in Darfur and my colleague from UN woman referred to the lack of access to emergency obstetric care and sex sexual reproductive health.
So in therefore over 252.5 million displaced women and girls have no access to basic reproductive health services, including emergency obstetric care.
Myself, I've been to many places hosting refugees and ID PS.
I mean in South, in South Sudan, in ABA Box, in, in Chad, but also in many states within the country which are hosting ID PS.
And when we talk to people, we ask them the reason for displacement.
They will tell you three things, safety, food and access to health care.
So yes, in addition of being a famine crisis, Sudan is also a protection and health crisis.
So at the same time, attacks on healthcare are on the rise.
In the past two years, WHO has verified 156 attacks on health, causing more than 300 deaths and over 270 injuries among either patients or healthcare workforce.
Data from 7 states reveals that 62% of the facilities are partially functional and the remaining 38% are not functional at all.
And access to funding is more challenging now than ever.
So we at WHO are determined to continue working to improve health access to to Sudan's people.
With our assistance.
Over the last two years, we provided over 1,000,000 people with with treatments in hospitals, primary healthcare, mobile clinics, 11.5 million children have been vaccinated for polio and measles.
Over 75,000 of severely acute malnutrition children had access to treatment for medical complications of malnutrition.
Over 12 million people have received cholera vaccines.
And just as a reminder, Sudan was the first country to introduce also the malaria vaccine in the Emerald region.
And we provided over 2250 metric tonnes of critical medical supplies.
So WHO must continue to implement its operations, including in the new accessible areas.
And here I'm talking about Jazeera with Medani, Khartoum and very soon most likely on the map.
But to be able to do so, we need more funding.
The recent funding cuts have severely affected our operations.
So half of the 9.3 million people targeted by the health cluster for 2025 will be affected and services at 335 health facilities will be reduced.
So we call on our partners to continue their support to WHO.
And I'm currently here in Cairo, where I've met with major partners for health, mainly on the development side.
But the humanitarian needs are growing.
And as we access more areas that were hard to reach in the past, we discovered that the needs are even greater than what was expected.
Thank you very much.
Sorry, Messi, Boku, Thank you, Doctor Sabani, and definitely not least.
But last I go to Olga for an update on the record displacement of people.
So as as we're hearing two years since the start of the war in Sudan, the news remains exceedingly grim.
The world's most damaging displacement crisis is now happening amidst the worst humanitarian funding crisis in decades.
The brutal conflict, which shows little sign of abating, has caused a colossal trail of suffering, with families torn apart, clouding the future of millions and endangering regional stability.
As displacement soars, the needs are more urgent today than ever.
Nearly 13 million people have led their homes to date, with almost 4 million crossing into neighbouring countries.
Displacement continued to grow in the second year of the conflict, with over 1,000,000 people fleeing Sudan.
New arrivals report witnessing mass killings, as well as experiencing systematic sexual violence and other human rights violations.
Half are children, including thousands without family.
Sudan is now the country with the largest number of its people displaced as refugees in Africa.
The recent end to fighting in Khartoum has offered an opportunity to reach refugees and displaced people who had been largely cut off from aid for two years.
Thousands of people have started to return to Khartoum, as well as other major urban centres in Umderman, Wad Madani and Jazeera State, but these numbers remain relatively slim compared to the 1,000,000 still displaced.
As the conflict and displacement have intensified, funding has lacked.
Funding for the Regional Refugee Response Plan is now less than 10% of what is needed, making it impossible to cover the most basic needs.
The latest global cuts in humanitarian funding have put critical programmes at risk, with teams forced to make and reasonable choices and refugees being left to resort to harmful strategies to mate to meet their basic needs.
Inside Sudan, reduced funding will cut access to clean water for at least half a million displaced people, significantly increasing risks of cholera and other water board diseases.
Lack of funding is also hindering the ability to move new arrivals to safer areas, away from overcrowded transit centres at the borders in places like South Sudan and Chad.
It's also putting immense pressure on education systems, with less teachers and less classrooms.
For many young girls this will mean increased risks of early marriage and for boys it means pressure to work or attempt a unsafe on work movements.
Across all hosting countries, safe spaces have been closed and social workers discontinued, leaving 10s of thousands of women and girls without counselling, healthcare and vital support.
The lack of peace, sustained aid and opportunities in asylum countries are also driving more and more people to seek safety far beyond Sudan's borders.
Over 70,000 Sudanese refugees have arrived in Uganda and others continue to attempt dangerous crossings to reach Europe.
While the number of Sudanese arriving in Europe remains low, arrivals increased by 38% year on year in the first two months of 2025.
We fear many more will have little choice but to join them.
Despite the constraints, neighbouring countries continue to keep their borders open, sharing the limited resources they have, and frontline humanitarian interventions by UNHCR and others are ongoing.
But with with conflict lines shifting, people constantly on the move and resources drying running dry, hope is fading.
A political solution for peace in Sudan is needed now more than ever.
Olga, thank you very much for this briefing, which concludes this list of intervention.
And I would like now to open the floor to questions to any colleague on this dire situation.
Let's start with Olivia, maybe to say to whom he wants to ask you a question.
[Other language spoken]
Sorry for the colleagues on the field.
Olivia Podman is our correspondent of Reuters.
Thank you everybody for this very hard but important briefing today.
Actually, Olga, to start with you, if I may, your point there about the number of people being forced to look at dangerous routes, namely to Europe and the increase that you're observing there.
Are you worried that amidst, you know, funding cuts and difficulties to to meet the basic needs of people that that might encourage more people to make that very difficult choice to to move out of Sudan, but even to move out all the region and over to Europe?
And also just in terms of you're saying there about the funding cuts, if I could just get a level of detail on what we're saying about kind of basic needs like what is that is that you know, food, water, social support.
[Other language spoken]
And just your level of concern therefore in regard to that.
[Other language spoken]
So, yeah, we're extremely concerned that this is something that we are going to be seeing increasing.
People just looking for the basic protection elsewhere.
The majority of the refugee Sudanese refugees are in neighbouring countries and and this is what we see globally as well.
In any refugee situation, they want to stay the closest they can they can to home.
Many of them, they are still living even two years later near to the border just because they want to go back as soon as they can.
But it is, it's true that for instance, some of our data shows that 28%, our registration data, 28% of those Sudanese refugees have secondary level education or university studies.
This is much higher than before the war.
The Sudanese refugees that were outside the country before the war, eight, only 8% of them had that level of education.
So it's very difficult for for a population as such to continue living, living just in makeshift shelters, just depending on humanitarian aid without much opportunities in their future.
So we are seeing these these these figures increasing.
We saw them since the beginning, increasing movements from South Sudan then to towards Uganda.
So the numbers in Uganda are quite large, but we are starting to see also movement from chat into Libya.
And as I mentioned, even if the numbers continue really, really small, I think it's about 2% of the arrivals into Europe are Sudanese nationals.
We are seeing an increase in, in, in the beginning of of of the year.
So of course it's a concern, but it's a concern that with humanitarian aid in the countries where they are, can be, can be sustained because that's what people want.
And, and we saw it in 2015.
We saw it with the Syrian crisis.
It was, there was a reduction on, on, on assistance at the time.
And, and it was part of the reasons why we saw then this movement towards Europe.
So yes, indeed, it's a concerned and, and especially the uncertainty that is bringing to the, to the refugees, the whole discussion and debate and, and, and the reality of, of seeing that humanitarian aid is, is drying up that we cannot do enough.
That's a huge concern in terms of of the basic needs.
It's, I mean there, there's, there's food, there's lack of access to water, there's lack of access especially to relocation from as I was mentioning from border areas where there are very limited centres to refugee sites that have that are more established that they have better healthcare systems, that they have better water systems.
So that relocation is, is extremely tough.
But like one of the biggest worries that we have is that we are seeing in a reduction of community of, of, of partners on the ground of social workers, a reduction of our staff also on the ground will mean that there is less people to just accompany refugees through this.
[Other language spoken]
Sometimes just having someone listening to you, to your needs, it's already provides already some kind of and some sort of respite and and that probably will not be longer, will no longer be there or at the same level as it is now.
So that's why peace is needed first of all, so people can go back home, but also increase funding.
It was already the Sudan situation was already underfunded in the previous years, but the current humanitarian aid breakdown is just putting things in in a much difficult state at the moment.
Thank you very much, Olga for this answer.
Other questions in the room don't see any hand up on the platform neither So well, thank you very much.
I, I see we've been extremely comprehensive with our briefing.
We hope also to respect respect also a statement from the Secretary general that we will send you as soon as possible.
And we really hope that you will bring your attention to this anniversary in the next days.
It's, it's very important to underline it.
So I'd, I'd like to thank Yens and all our colleagues in the field for having briefed us and us maybe Margaret and you come back afterwards for Syria and Ravina to stay on the podium while we're going to our next subject, which is Gaza.
And on Gaza, where also the situation is extremely dire.
From Gaza, we will hear from WHO or Doctor Rick Peppercorn and from Ravina on the situation of the transfer of Palestinians.
Me maybe I'll start with you, Ravina, and then we will go to Rick and then I'll open the floor to questions.
[Other language spoken]
And maybe in the meantime, we can connect to Rick.
[Other language spoken]
You have already received quite a detailed press briefing note by e-mail from the office.
So I won't go into all of the details, but I'll read out some of the points from there.
The increasing issuance by Israeli forces of evacuation orders which are in effect displacement orders, have resulted in the forcible transfer of Palestinians in Gaza into ever shrinking spaces where they have little or no access to life saving services, including water, food and shelter, and where they continue to be subjected to attacks.
While Israel, as an occupying power, can lawfully order the temporary evacuations of civilians in certain areas under strict conditions, the nature and scope of the evacuation orders raises serious concerns that Israel intends permanently to remove the civilian population from these areas in order to create a so-called buffer zone.
Permanently displacing the civilian population within occupied territory amounts to forcible transfer, which is a grave breach of the 4th Geneva Convention and a crime against humanity.
Meanwhile, Israeli military strikes continue across Gaza, leaving nowhere safe.
Between the 18th of March and the 9th of April this year, there were some 224 incidents of Israeli strikes on residential buildings and tents for internally displaced people.
In some 36 strikes about which we were able to corroborate information, the fatalities recorded were only women and children so far.
Compounding this alarming trend is the targeting and killing of Palestinian journalists.
Since October, the 2023 / 209 journalists have been killed in Gaza, while Israel continues to deny access to international media.
These and other attacks raise serious questions about Israeli forces compliance with international humanitarian law, particularly the principles of distinction, proportionality and precaution in attack.
Intentionally directing attacks against civilians, not taking a direct part in hostilities constitutes a war crime, further compounding the desperate conditions for Palestinian civilians.
Israel's closure of crossings into the Gaza Strip has entered its sixth week, preventing the entry of food, safe drinking water, medicines and other essential aid or supplies.
Israeli officials have made statements suggesting that the entry of humanitarian aid is directly linked to the release of hostages.
This raises serious concerns about collective punishment and the use of starvation of the civilian population as a method of war, both of which constitute crimes against international law.
In light of the cumulative impact of Israeli forces conduct in Gaza, the Office is seriously concerned that Israel appears to be inflicting on Palestinians in Gaza conditions of life increasingly incompatible with their continued existence as a group in Gaza.
Protests by Palestinians against Hamas in exercise of their rights to peaceful assembly and expression under international law have also been repressed by force, with harsh retribution exacted against a number of individuals.
The despair of Palestinians under ******* from outside, as well as under such pressure within knows no bounds.
The UN **** Commissioner for Human Rights, Volcker Turk, has stressed, including before the UN Security Council last week, that the last 18 months of violence have made this abundantly clear.
There is no military path out of this crisis.
All parties must be entirely focused on achieving A ceasefire rather than seeking to justify the prolongation of the senseless violence.
The only way forward is a political settlement based on two states living side by side in equal dignity and rights.
In line with UN resolutions and international law.
All hostages must be released immediately and unconditionally.
All those arbitrarily detained must also be released.
Ravina, thank you very much for this important update.
I hope Rick is connected.
I saw his name on the list.
Rick, are you there?
[Other language spoken]
[Other language spoken]
Yes, Please go ahead with brief remarks and we'll open the floor to questions.
Thank you very much.
[Other language spoken]
Good morning to all of your greetings from Jerusalem.
So first of all, the aid blockades is challenging WHO ability to keep hospitals partially or even minimal operationals.
The Who stocks of medicine supplies and equipment are running critically low and making it a challenging to keep these hospital supplies amid rising violence.
Just to manage something, we are critically low in our three warehouses, 2IN Dera Balajan units and one in Gaza on antibiotics, IV fluid, fluids, blood units, insulin, **** blood pressure inhalers, catheter, surgical Airways, but also hygiene products or medicine for cancer and ultra mean conditions and assistive devices, wheelchairs, etcetera, blood transfusion supplies etcetera.
But we are completely the WHL warehouse completely run out of therapeutic milk, intravenous antibiotics to treat severe infections, orthopaedic consumer, consumer ulcers as external pixaters, which are very much needed with specifically in all the trauma patients we are.
We are currently seeing again painkillers, entry hypertensive drugs, insulin and spare parts for ambulance and oxygen stations.
The Ministry of Health, they report themselves almost 40% of their essential medicines are at 0 stock in their central drug store and almost 60% of the medical disposables items are reported AS0 stock at a central medical store.
So we are ready, I just want to mention that ready to to move supplies to Gaza and around 158 metric tonnes worth 2.3 million are piling up at Al Arish and at the Dubai hub.
Another 36 metre tonnes of supplies have arrived at the Dubai waiting the opening of the Unitarian corridors before they get sent to Gaza.
It also delays, I mean like we know that there's medicines with expiry dates etcetera, all related to that.
And due to the blockade, we had to divert another 2.2 million in health supplies to the Dubai hub to write to avoid that these supplies are piling up at suppliers at the point of Aaron's entry, which are currently closed.
And I just want to remind as well, there is Article 55 programme, one of the FORGE Geneva Convention that provides an occupying power asset duty of ensuring foods and medical supplies of the population.
What does this mean and what does this mean?
And I think from our team on the grounds and and and discussing with our colleagues and the doctors for example in the north and one report from a doctor in athlete hospital is very striking.
Vertical hospital is all flowing.
They're forced to perform surgery with questionable sterile condition due to the lack of surgical gowns, surgical drapes, gloss, etcetera.
In some cases, surgery are just performed with blows alone.
We even hear that, that they don't change the gloves from one operation to the other operation.
Well, we know what impact is on on infection prevention and control with their many open wounds and and the potential of, of infection, osteomyelitis and then even future potentially amputation.
External fixator pins, for example, being used are dull.
So some of the surgeries which will take 30 minutes, they can take hours because this pins are not working there though where the drill bits have no power or they're broken.
So simple fractures often have to be fixed inadequately due to the lack of resources and supplies.
This will lead again to permanent disability or worse.
And, and just to give an example, in our warehouse in the South we do have those surgical clothes and a number of priority medical items, but currently we are not allowed to deliver the supplies from the South to the north.
So the the VHR also is supporting the deployment of EMTs.
But since 18th of March, only 28 EMT staff have been able to enter Gaza and the number of international emergency medical teams deployed.
This decrease from 97 to 68 due to these denials of entry into Gaza, depriving hospitals to support where they absolutely need them because the caseload is immense, medical evacuation extremely slow.
Only one of the 21 people, including 73 children, have been medical evacuated through Karen Shalom since the latest Rafa closure on 18 March.
[Other language spoken]
WHO supported the medical attack?
Here is 80 patients and 29 companions, and with a Rafa cross enclosed and daily medical evacuation spending, far too few patients are able to leave Gaza for urgent care.
The desperately needs, and it races many times between 10 and 12,000 patients in Gaza still need medical evacuation and we urgently call for the immediate resumption of medical evacuation through all possible routes, particularly restoring the medical referral pathway to the West Bank and E Jerusalem.
Our current access and movement are once again shrinking.
Not just from WHO, from all UN, our UN partners and international NGOs.
So all missions need coordination, restricting our ability to move and reach hospitals.
Today, for example, the mission to Indonesian Hospital was denied.
I mentioned already that currently we are still not allowed to transfer supplies from the South to the north.
This needs to chase.
This needs to chase immediately.
We're deeply concerned.
My last point about the attacks on health.
Recently we've seen 15 health workers, including eight Palestinian Red Crescent colleagues, killed in Rafa.
One of the Pocs staff was part of the same team remains missing.
WHL's deeply concerned about the well-being and WHL echoes the UN call for justice and answers for an independence investigation.
So the three points, what we need now most is first, lifting of the aid blockade combines with humanitarian deliveries and movements within Gaza, all over Gaza where it's needed and of course, a ceasefire.
Over to you, Rick.
Thank you very much for this update.
I'll open the floor to questions now in the room.
Yes, Mohammed, an adult one.
Thank you, Alessandro.
My question for Ravina.
Ravina, thank you for this briefing.
[Other language spoken]
My question will be about the Rafa city of Rafa.
You already mentioned in your speech, Israeli Defence Minister cuts announced that they will occupy the Rafa and expels at the population from here and turn this city into a buffer zone.
My question is what culture, what will be the consequence of such a plan being implemented?
[Other language spoken]
[Other language spoken]
Thanks very much.
Yes, we are aware of the remarks and we're also aware of what is actually going on on the ground with some 21 evacuation orders that have been issued since the 18th of March.
And let us be clear, these so-called evacuation orders are actually displacement orders leading to displacement of the population of Gaza into ever shrinking spaces which essentially amounts to forcible transfer.
As I said, the permanently displacing the civilian population within occupied territories amounts to forcible transfer, which is a grave breach of the 4th Geneva Convention and it is a crime against humanity.
Thank you very much, John.
[Other language spoken]
My question is to Rick.
Rick, I was wondering if you can elaborate a little bit.
What's the official explanation you're getting from the Israeli authorities for not allowing the medical supplies to go in?
I recall for many years we had similar situation in a neighbouring Syria where supplies would be authorised and then not allowed to go through.
What can you walk us through the mechanism with the Israeli authorities and what's their official explanation why they're withholding it?
Thanks, well I can just tell you what's happening and with currently better what is not happening.
You're all aware about 8 bouquets that affects all goods and supplies which is needed.
I would say food is the is the first item and water, shelter and of course medical supplies.
So nothing is coming in since the 4th of March.
So we as WHO we had during the ceasefire, we had stocked up pretty well both hospitals, Primary Health care facilities, but also our warehouses.
But of course since the 4th of March, Austin comes in and then and and and and a few days later the hostilities resumed again.
We see a massive amount again, especially on the trauma area, etcetera.
So very quickly shortages and I mentioned all the shortages quite specifically they come up both for WHO, also for the industry of health and, and other partners and we try to code it.
So now what we are currently doing is from our warehouses, which are maybe absolutely not full anymore and probably half and, and if we continue like this within a number of weeks, we will run out.
And we rationalise now and based on requests from hospitals, we rationalise the, the request where we bring them the, the essential medicine and medical supplies we have.
So currently, I don't think it's in this also the this instant highly insecure environment we focus as WHO, what we call on on programme critically criticality actually the UN in general programme critical criticality one and two activities, which is focused on saving lives, reduce morbidity.
So a who that means delivering essential medical, essential medicines and medical supplies wherever it's possible and feasible and, and whatever mechanism 2 that we help to deploy emergency medical teams who need to assist their Palestinian colleagues in certain certain areas and support them.
Three, internal, what we call internal medevac or transfer together with PRCS where we need to transfer some patients from, from, from one hospital where they cannot get their specialised service to another one.
And external medevac and coordination as I discussed, there are of course constantly discussions going on, on this a blockade, but also internally.
And I've said that we go back to this discussion that missions have to be notified within Gaza.
And we've been, we've been there before.
But even if there's a war situation, that should be facilitated.
So then then we should have proper notification mechanism and and deconfliction mechanism so that the humanitarians can do their work and they can move around whatever you call a humanitarian corridors missions.
We did it in the past.
We know all the challenges we had in the past, but even then a lot of missions denied, delayed, etcetera, etcetera.
[Other language spoken]
That's not of course, I think now we also have an A blockade and the, a blockade needs to be lifted not just for an amount of supplies and we think about food and water etcetera, they're even bigger priority.
So that needs to be lifted.
And then we of course we all hope for a reservation of ceasefire.
That would be the best news and that we, but even if there's no ceasefire, there should be Unitarian corridors.
We should get the supplies in and we should be able to deliver wherever it's needed.
Over to you.
Thank you very much.
[Other language spoken]
[Other language spoken]
[Other language spoken]
[Other language spoken]
[Other language spoken]
Doctor Pipakong, over a month ago, you talk about the first round of the polio campaign and then you said that we should have a second round in four weeks time.
And then since there's A8 blockade and then assumption of violence.
So could you tell us what happened to the polio campaign in Gaza and then also talk about the consequences of it without the polio campaign?
[Other language spoken]
Yeah, thank you very much.
[Other language spoken]
I mean and and and of course we talk about this circulated vaccine derived polio virus and yeah, we should have another round and maybe by the way even the future rounds of polio because sometimes it takes three to four and even 5 rounds to really eradicate that either from the environment, from the environment.
The discussion of these 4th rounds, they are ongoing, but in light of the, this incredibly unstable and volatile situation for a proper polio campaign, and then we raised it many times, you need 95% coverage and you, we need a ceasefire.
And for most, because we need to, to, to safely, first of all, the, the mothers and, and, and fathers need to be able to bring their children in safety, but also there's hundreds of teams needs to move around.
And secondly, I mean like, so that's all not there at the moment.
So currently there is, it's not possible to have a campaign like that.
So we need to create the environment or the environment need to be there that we can do it.
And currently it would also be, I think a little strange that we even would try to do a polio campaign.
While of course families have huge priorities when you look at food and water and everything else.
So that's combination with that.
[Other language spoken]
[Other language spoken]
Whenever it's feasible, we will go for it over to you.
Thank you very much indeed.
We will need that, Olivia.
[Other language spoken]
Rick.
I may start, start with you, Doctor Peppercorn.
You said it's hard to keep hospitals even partially operational.
Can you just give some details on on how and why?
And perhaps just some detail on some of the very difficult choices that are having to be made now in light of medical shortages?
And also a question for Ravina, mentioning there in your statement concerns about violations.
Are you concerned that Israel is using tactics like blocking aid as a tactic to render Gaza unlivable for some of the inhabitants and that could be also a tactic to try and encourage them to eventually leave if conditions were to continue and if versus fire were to be in place eventually?
[Other language spoken]
Thank you, Rick.
[Other language spoken]
So first I mean like if you take the overview would we say that 22 and 36 hospitals are partially or slash minimal functional and and and we have to constantly to relook at that because some of the hospitals which we still call partly is less minimum functional.
There are in the so-called evacuation zone for example Indonesian hospital.
That means that very few people are around Indonesian hospital that most likely very few patients can go there, they don't get the support they need etcetera.
That also applies for the primary healthcare, The primary healthcare, we have 67 primary healthcare facilities out of 150 through which are partly to minimal functional.
What is currently of course the problem is that first it's again very unsafe to move around so forth.
So we see a stark reduction from patient consultations.
People really are afraid to go to those facilities in, in, in many cases and they will only go there when it is absolutely needed.
I had some data on that and I maybe I'll get back to that in the, in the report, but that is an, an, an issue.
And then of course the, the hospitals and, and also these Primary Health care facilities are running out of the most essential medications, essential medicines, but also medical supplies.
And I mentioned a lot of them where we and, and, and WHO is the main provider of essential medicine, medical supplies.
We run out of these supplies.
It's worse in this hospital.
And the example from our last the hospital I think speaks for itself how this works out on the grounds in those hospitals.
And, and we get all these horror reports of, of hospitals where they lack this supply and death supplies and even sometimes the most basics including including, I would say cleaning material.
If you think about infection prevention and control at hospitals, it's always a huge has been a huge issue with the whole crisis we are in for the last 16-17 months.
And that's of course very much increasing when there's again, an active warning going, but even more when there's an A blockade and nothing comes in and we cannot resupply.
And then even the last point, we, we currently have difficulties getting every, any mission approved, bringing supplies, for example, from the South where we have a bit more supplies to the north in, in, in some of these hospitals where it's most needed.
Over to you.
[Other language spoken]
What what we're seeing now is a combination of several key factors affecting the population in Gaza.
There is the forcible transfer of the population.
There is a denial of basic needs and there are continued military strikes hitting civilian infrastructure and civilians.
So our statement today does take our concerns to a new level, that the cumulative effect of what is happening in Gaza today, the death, the destruction, the displacement, the denial of access to basic necessities within Gaza and the repeated suggestion that Gazans should leave the territory entirely, raise real concerns as to the future viability of Palestinians as a group in Gaza.
We have already reported on the degree to which the social and the cultural fabric has been deeply damaged and a generation of children who are of course the Palestinian future, has been profoundly traumatised and denied crucial years of education.
The point we have reached now is a critical one, and that is the the warning that we are issuing that in light of the cumulative impact of Israeli forces conduct in Gaza, we are seriously concerned that Israel appears to be inflicting on Palestinians in Gaza conditions of life increasingly incompatible with their continued existence as a group.
Thank you very much, very clear.
There are questions, I don't see any.
So thank you very much, Rick, for being with us again for this important update.
I'll ask Ravina to stay on the podium because you have a quick update on Myanmar and then we will go to Syria.
With thanks to the colleague from UNHCR was patiently waiting.
Ravine, I'll make this very brief.
You received earlier this morning comment on Myanmar and our representative, the head of our Myanmar office, was based in Bangkok.
He had briefed you last week, so we wanted to update you on that.
At a moment when the sole focus should be on ensuring humanitarian aid gets to disaster zones, the military is instead continuing to launch attacks.
Since the earthquake, military forces have reportedly carried out over 120 attacks, and more than half of them after their declared ceasefire was due to have gone into effect on the 2nd of April.
The traditionally festive season of Ting Yan and the start of the new year begins on Sunday in Myanmar, and we're calling for common efforts to assist those in the greatest need.
In this spirit, we call on the military as well to announce a full amnesty for detainees it has incarcerated since February 2021 and for all and any obstacles to humanitarian assistance to be removed, for all military operations to be seized.
Thank you very much.
[Other language spoken]
And I think everybody received the note.
Any question on Myanmar in the room or on the platform?
I don't see any.
So thanks again, Ravina, for this extensive briefings.
I'm bringing your colleague to the briefing again.
Last but definitely not least, we we have a colleague of UNHCR who has been patiently waiting.
I'd like to welcome Celine Schmidt, who is the UNHCR spokesperson in Syria.
Celine is coming to us from Damascus to tell us about the 400,000 Syrians return and the related needs.
So I'll go straight to you Celine, if you could give us your remarks.
[Other language spoken]
Thank you very much and and good morning.
Yes, indeed.
So as of today, 400,000 Syrians have returned to Syria from neighbouring countries since the 18th of December 2024.
This means that 400,000 people have returned home, they've reunited with their families, with their neighbours and they're rebuilding their life in Syria.
But we are at a critical moment because the end of the school year this summer will be a critical moment for the return and an opportunity not to be missed.
But to make these returns possible and sustainable, Syrians would need support, shelter, livelihoods protection, legal assistance and UNHCR has a long expertise in those areas.
The risk is that without adequate funding, the protected 1.5 million returnees who are supposed to return this year will not return or will not be able to stay in Syria.
UNHCI is facing severe funding cuts.
We've received only a part of the amount of the money we would need to implement our programmes in Syria and without the additional funding, we will only be able to help a small amount of people who are coming back.
The funding cuts are impacting our workforce, which will shrink by 30% inside Syria, and it will affect our capacity to implement our activities.
Some of our critical activities will have to stop as well, for example, our community centres.
Out of the 122 community centres, 44% will have to be closed before the summer and those community centres provide essential help to Syrians, not only Vietnamese legal assistance assistance, mental health support.
So we need more funding.
We are extremely grateful for the support of our traditional donors.
We asking them to make an extra effort, but we also need new donors to come in.
So despite all these challenges.
UNHCR staying delivering in Syria, working very closely with other UN partners.
And that's very important because it's our collective efforts that will help us, you know, to help Syrians who are willing to go back home to restart their life in Syria.
We've also launched a new digital platform to provide updated, verified information for Syrians who are willing to go back home.
So now is is a critical moment, is a time to invest in facilitating the returns of Syrians who have been waiting for this for years.
It's an opportunity we have to keep up the hope of the Syrians and it's our collective responsibility to make it happen, to allow them to go back home where they've been waiting for some sometimes 14 years.
[Other language spoken]
I don't see hands up in the room but we have online Musa Hasi al Maidin TV.
[Other language spoken]
[Other language spoken]
Special more apreli leis even more the the the the the villa la courtierien savvy le zata counter SE SE SE sei sei sei.
[Other language spoken]
If it is more from the Monday to shift to that bar, I kind of read this one.
If it is more on on in estimation do cat person or count.
It is even more don't shritos even more on Mad Max Don't reason cotier online estimation Don't even talk me a person a mercy Celine for a paddock.
Merci beaucoup Vienna Vienna note le lapel pulifu contribution briefing the conclude hot dog note briefing.
She's just I'm sorry, I switched to English back.
There's just a reminder from WTO that they've asked me to to bring to you a reminder to attend the upcoming World Trade Organisation embargoed press conference on the Global Trade Outlook and Statistics, which will take place on 16 April at 2:00 PM Geneva time.
The embargo will lift at 3:00 PM Geneva time on the same day and the press conference will feature Director General Ngozi Ogonto Iwala and Chief Economist Ralph OSA.
The event will be held in Room D of the WTO Building and also available via Zoom.
An embargoed copy of the report and news item will be available on the WTO Online Media Newsroom at noon at the same on the same day.
If you wish to participate either virtually or in person, please may e-mail mediateam@wto.org or contact our colleagues.
Was that a hand Mohammed or you're just leaving?
[Other language spoken]
[Other language spoken]
Thank you very much to everyone for having followed this very long and and extremely important briefing and I wish you a very good weekend and see you next week.
[Other language spoken]