Welcome to the press briefing of the Information Service here at the UN in Geneva.
Today is Friday, 21st of March.
We have a very dense briefing today and I would like to start by recognising the presence of the Deputy Executive Director of UNICEF, Kitty Vander Heiden, who's joining us from Abuja, Nigeria.
Thank you very much, Madam, for being with us.
It's really an honour and a pleasure.
But before going to her, let's start this briefing by focusing on, unfortunately, it was very **** in the news at the moment, which is the situation in Gaza.
For this we have also the pleasure to have with us some Rose, sorry, some rules of Unrah who is connecting, I think from Amman, if I'm not wrong, some please correct me if I, if I am wrong.
And also on the podium with me, the spokesperson of UNICEF, James Elder and of IFRC, Tomaso de la Lunga.
Just I would like to start this part of the briefing by reminding you that yesterday the Secretary General who is currently in Brussels, spoke together with Mr Antonio Costa to the press in Brussels.
And among other things, I think we, you have the, the, the full statement that I wanted to mention that he spoke about Gaza hearing you disappear for respect of the ceasefire, for the unimpeded humanitarian access to all areas and for the immediate unconditional release of the hostages.
And again, please have a look at the full remarks that we have shared with you.
And I'll start by giving immediately the, the floor to Sam and then we will go to the, to the colleagues on the podium.
Sam, please, you have the floor.
And I hope you can hear me in the room in Geneva.
And I'm I am being told by everyone on the on the chat that you are connecting from Gaza.
I think I, I remember the the first exchange, but yeah, you are in Gaza.
And thank you very much for giving us this eyewitness remarks as as an eyewitness.
I am indeed connecting to you from from Gaza.
I'm in the central Gaza Strip, about a kilometre South of the Netzarim corridor.
And and look, it's 11:30 here.
We're waking up from another intense night of of bombardments, the fourth night of bombardment since the ceasefire abruptly broke down on on on on Monday night.
And the situation is gravely, gravely concerning.
The bombardments that are across the Gaza Strip have led to large scale loss of life over the past 4-4 days.
Most of those deaths have occurred at night.
The Ministry of Health Care is reporting around 600 people killed amongst those around 200 women and, and, and, and children.
So absolutely desperate tragedies that are occurring all over over Gaza.
Coupled with that, we're seeing evacuation orders, we're seeing live scale displacement, lots of people forced, lots forced to move, lots of people on on the move.
Yet again, Israeli forces have reoccupied and moved back into the Netserim corridor, which separates Gaza City and northern Gaza from the rest of of of the Gaza Strip.
And, and ground operations, they're being described as limited ground operations are under way in various parts of, of Gaza.
And just over the past few minutes, the Israeli defence minister has issued instructions for further occupation of, of parts of Gaza.
So very much an evolving situation here.
And of course, this all comes against a backdrop of no supplies having entered Gaza since the beginning of March.
So this is the longest period since the start of the conflict back in October 2023 when no supplies whatsoever have entered Gaza.
That's supplies of aid, commercial supplies, but also fuel, which keeps everything going here.
And you'll recall the reports that the sole electricity line that was feeding Gaza was cut off in in the middle of of of last week.
And that immediately has translated into a massive reduction in distributions, distributions of essential supplies, food, shelter supplies, non food items for desperate families and also a drawdown in in services because of the bombardments.
It's making a lot more difficult for people to move around around to the to the distribution centres, to the health centres, etcetera.
And of course, when people are on the move, there always has to be a recalibration of how those services are are provided.
The area around me was empty as of a few days ago.
But already people are are moving back.
People are, are are fearing the worst yet again.
And we can say categorically that the progress that we made as an aid system over the six weeks of the ceasefire is already being reversed.
This is in terms of basic sustenance, but it's also the services that that we're providing and the hope that people have started to have that that life was gradually getting back to some kind of, of, of routine.
And the risks and the fear and the suffering and the humiliation and cruelty that people have gone through over the past 18 months was something, was something of the past.
I mean, look, this, this briefing was arranged or organised about a week ago.
And I was hoping to be able to tell you about all the work that UNRWA had done to restore services, restoring primary healthcare to 200,000 people through opening, reopening of our health centres and, and, and kind of most importantly, restoring access to education for 50,000 young girls and, and boys at schools across central and, and southern Gaza.
The images, the videos, the life and the happiness in the eyes of the children and the pupils was really something to behold.
One of the few positive stories that we'd have been able to communicate from, from guards.
But alas, all that is, is, is, is is back, back to naughty.
Those schools, those learning centres are, are, are are now suspended.
We are able to, to continue some health services, but it's very, very difficult when the situation is so dangerous for people to move around and look, we've, we've been through this before.
We know how how this goes.
If the ceasefire is not restored, this means white lifescale loss of life, damage to infrastructure, property, increased risk of infectious disease and massive, massive trauma for the 1,000,000 children and for the 2,000,000 civilians who live in, in, in Gaza.
And it's worse this time because people are already exhausted.
They're, they're already degraded their, their immune systems, their, their mental health, people's populations on on, on the on the verge of famine.
We're not starting from scratch here.
This is a population that has already suffered so much in many ways.
These are the aftershocks after, after the, the earthquakes of, of October, the, the, the 7th and everything that's happened happened since then.
It's fear on top of fear, cruelty on top of cruelty and tragedy on on top of tragedy.
And the people I speak to, refugees, 100 colleagues, they're really feeling lost.
Just as I said, as people were starting to hope for their futures, they're back to where they, they, they were.
They feel defeated, they feel hopeless.
They feel yet again scared.
The, the, the, the memories that we had from, from the war of going to bed, not knowing if if loved ones and colleagues would be safe, would be alive in the morning.
All that is, is is starting again including tragically amongst UN colleagues.
As you said, Alessandra, at the start, they've been 700 staff have been killed since the fighting resumed.
And, and one you not staff member as well an international staff member in a deconflicted UN property.
Our thoughts are with his family and our thoughts are also with the families of, of, of those who were also gravely injured in that incident.
But I'll end by saying it's not too late.
We can restore the, the ceasefire, as you said, as the Secretary general said, we can, we call for a, an immediate and and unconditional release of, of hostages.
We call for protections for UN workers, for medical staff, for all humanitarian workers, and we call for a resumption and an uninterrupted flow of aid so that we can get supplies to the people that need them so services can get back up and running and we can put this behind us.
It's we, we, we've been through this once already.
We absolutely do not need to go through it again.
We, the parties, the conflict, the powers and the member states need to do everything to put this to an end before it's too late.
Back to you and I'm happy to take any questions.
Thank you very much, Sam.
And indeed, as you said, this is terrible.
But also we would like to share our condolences with the families of the staff that has been killed and our thoughts for those who are still in the hospitals.
And I would also like now to give the floor to James.
Oh, you want to add something?
No, it's only for questions.
Then I, I go to Tomaso for IFRC and then we will open the floor to questions.
We will have questions in a moment.
Tomas, thank you very much for Sandra and good morning, all.
I would like to give you the latest updates from our teams on the ground in the Gaza Strip.
In the last 48 hours, Palestinian Crescent colleagues has had hundreds of call outs across the Gaza Strip and responded to dozens of fatalities and injuries.
As bombing continues, Palestinian Crescent is also responding to calls of people missing and trapped under collapsed buildings and rubbles.
Our volunteers and staff have been helping in the outbreaking task of recovering the bodies of those missing, for example, in and around Rafa.
In the last 48 hours, our medics in Palestine Christian Medical Facility have told us that doctors are exhausted, essential medical supplies are running low and corridors are crowded with people either in need of treatment or waiting to find out whether their loved ones will survive.
Palestine Crescent has been working to rehabilitate and reopen damage clinics, health centres, hospitals, particularly since the ceasefire started in January.
But since Gaza was sealed off to a delivery nearly three weeks ago, this has become an even greater challenge.
We have critical supplies of medical equipment, medicines and fuel waiting in our warehouses in Egypt and Jordan.
But until the border crossings reopen, Palestine Crescent and the people of Gaza are facing a new crisis.
But as an equation, ambulance service has been significantly impacted as fuel supplies are drying up.
Of 53 emergency vehicles that were operating before the border closure, 23 remain.
This is a direct result of the lack of availability of gasoline.
We are also hearing from colleagues in Gaza that is becoming increasingly difficult for our teams and for civilians to move around the Strip.
And they're also telling us that in the last three days, the impact of chronic water shortages in Gaza is growing in severity.
This means the level of sickness is increasing, especially among children.
This is also having a direct impact impact on hygiene and sanitation.
We are seeing growing cases of people with infections, breathing difficulties, stomach problems and skin infections, particularly again among children.
The AFRC logistics centres in Jordan and Egypt continue to prepare for the moment we can transport aid to Gaza.
Since the start of Ramadan, we have seen an outpouring of support from countries sending consignments of urgent supplies.
As of yesterday, 20 March, we still have capacity to store in our warehouses.
We don't know how long it will take before there is no longer the space to store, but we're talking about weeks rather than months.
The IFRC takes no side other than the side of humanity.
We reiterate our calls on all parties to protect civilians, humanitarians and healthcare workers and facilities.
Ensure safe and unneeded access for aid and essential services.
Open all available border crossing to assure a continuous and expanded flow humanitarian aid, including medical supplies, food and fuel.
Immediately and unconditionally release all the hostages.
Thank you, Thomas, and again, thanks to Sam.
I'll open the floor to question now.
First in the room, Nina Larson, AFP.
Thank you for taking the question.
So I wanted to ask about, I mean, there are Israeli allegations that there are that there's plenty of aid still inside of Gaza, that the warehouse houses been full or that Hamas has been stealing the aid.
What can you, what can you say about that?
And also I'd like to ask about the ability to, to, I mean, if, if you've received any indications that aid will be allowed in what kind of discussions you're having?
And finally, just on the trauma that that the especially the children in Gaza are suffering, if you could say a little bit more, this is for maybe for Mr Rose or for James about what kind of trauma or reactions you're seeing given, you know, the on again off again situation.
Thank you very much, Sam.
And then James also want to add something, Sam, please.
Look, we were able to bring in more supplies and during the six weeks of the ceasefire than we had been in the previous six months.
These were supplies that were backed up that were blocked at ports at the border because of difficulties in bringing things in.
Those supplies have essentially all been been distributed as UNRWA.
We provided food to 2 million people.
We provided hygiene kits, children's clothes, tents, mattresses, blankets, you name it.
I'm not saying our warehouses are, are empty, but there's very little left in the in in stock right now.
The nature of, of this operation and the scale and the universality of of of need is such that we need to keep the pipeline going completely and any interruption in that has an almost immediate impact on, on, on, on the population.
We ramped up as a system as UNRWA and others.
We showed what we were able to do already we're seeing the the impacts of that.
UNRWA has enough flower to provide to distribute for a few more days.
We estimate that 1,000,000 people in March will go without their their ration, so we'll only reach 1,000,000 people rather than than 2 million people.
Six of the 25 bakeries that WFP was supporting have already had to close down.
We're seeing on the streets larger crowds outside those bakeries, increased agitation amongst populations as well.
So as this continue with, we will see a gradual slide back into what we saw at the in the worst days of of the conflicts in terms of looting, in terms of crowd problems, in terms of agitation and frustration, all translating into desperate conditions amongst the the population.
When children and malnourished, they need steady supplies for 5-6 weeks just to stabilise their condition.
There's no improvement in in their weights in their nutritional situation over those those weeks.
If that those supplies are are interrupted.
And that interruption happens both as a result of of limited distributions, but also if people are on on the move and they can't maintain those, those services going to the health clinics, etcetera.
We've also got issues with, with petrol moving around.
We've got enough fuel to work the the diesel generators for, for a few more weeks.
But it's absolutely critical that these supplies keep coming in as Unruh as the rest of the system.
We have very robust measures for for distribution, robust systems that we've had in place for a long time here speaking on behalf of Unruh, It's direct distribution from the moment it comes into the moment it gets to the the populations in need.
We have end to end control through that direct implementation system and, and, and, and trauma amongst amongst children.
It's look, these are children that were already traumatised at the outbreak of of the war, as a Save the Children report noted in in September 2023, as children woken up through the night, children wetting beds, children who are who are distressed, living in fear of, of the noise that they see of this, the humiliation of, of, of of their parents.
All these facts as in the lack and the complete lack of normality in in their lives.
Children who'd come back to school after 18 months out of school, now back in tents, now back on the road, hearing the bombardments around them constantly, absolutely desperate for, for, for, for them.
I'll turn to maybe James has something to add on, on.
If we start with trauma, I mean, unfortunately the best we can get is, is anecdotalised.
And the number of child psychologists I spoke to in Gaza who would speak about being in uncharted territory.
Then they would expand that and say their great fear actually is that things would deteriorate when children got home, when this nightmare ended and they got home and they saw what had happened to their home or they started to understand that their neighbour had been killed or their, their best friend or their auntie wasn't missing and and they that their auntie in fact had been killed.
The child psychologist would say our absolute nightmare is that they return home and then it starts again.
So that's the terrain that we've now entered.
We don't have an example in modern history in terms of an entire child population needing mental health support.
And there's no exaggeration that's the case.
And we have to then segue into what that means for the future of Gaza.
Yeah, it the literacy rates in Gaza were amongst the highest in the world.
And that's despite all the crises that befell Gaza over the past 15 years.
That's because grandparents and parents did everything they possibly could always to prioritise education.
And it's why universities employ and employers across the region seek out Gazans because of that education rate.
Our great fear now is that we are losing a generation in terms of education and in terms of of a mental health crisis that we've not seen before.
When we come to aid, I mean, Sam captures it, international humanitarian law is, is really clear.
You know, ceasefire or not, aid must flow.
So if we look at UNICEF specifically, we've got 180,000 doses of vaccines a few kilometres away that are life saving and are blocked.
You know, the biggest desalina tion plant that UNICEF supports has not had electricity for weeks and it is below 15% capacity.
That translates to hundreds of thousands of civilians being deprived clean water or just on a simple thing.
We we have more and more mums or more and more women giving birth preterm.
That happens all around the world.
It's happening more and more in Gaza based on stress, based on nutrition.
Now, Gaza had many, many hospitals that had incubators, you know, preterm babies, they need their lungs developed.
And incubator is a very basic medicine, a very, very basic instrument that does that.
They have a massive shortage.
We have dozens of them again, sitting across the border, blocked ventilators for babies.
So, you know, we are at a point where none of us wanted to believe we'd be here again.
None of us wanted to think this could be happening again.
But as Sam outlined, you know, here we are, you know, 180 girls and boys killed, killed, you know, in a single day.
So children's rights have been ignored.
They've been dismantled, not by accident, but by choice.
So as we've said since October 2023, those with power must act because protecting children, getting aid to children is not optional.
Nina, we have so many questions.
Really briefly because I really need to to go ahead.
Sorry it was it was just specifically on the question if you've seen any sign that that Hamas or anyone else is is stealing the aid that's inside Gaza and on the number of deaths among Anura staff, if you could give us the total figure now that would be helpful.
Thank you Some just quickly on this follow up then we go to the second question.
I have not seen any evidence no of, of, I mean, there's no aid being distributed right right now.
So there's nothing to to steal.
I mean, what we fear is that if the situation continues like this, that we will go back to the worst days earlier in the conflict when we saw looting, when we saw criminality, when we have less control because of the insecurity of the, the, the environment.
And as James said, it said, it's still within our hands to to stop that ceasefire or not.
There are rules of war and international humanitarian law dictates the the, the facilitation of, of aid as did the International court, Court of Justice.
In terms of UNRWA personnel killed, we are at 281 as things stand right now.
I believe those numbers are, are often difficult to verify in, in, in situations like this because we're waking up every day with new reports of colleagues who have been killed.
So over 280, including seven since since the ceasefire broke down.
These are midwives, these are nurses, these are teachers, these were people who are, who are at home.
And I think that's why we've seen so many women and children killed in in this phase of, of the conflict because these bombardments have been happening at night when families are asleep in their in their homes and their beds.
Thank you very much, Sam.
Let me go to the second question here.
Thank you everybody for this briefing.
Sam, may I may I kindly start with you just about fears of famine.
I think you said some populations on the verge of famine.
Are you able to give some details on where, which part of the enclave that concerns and how many people?
And can you just also clarify what you said about distribution of flour?
Did you say it's a matter of days worth of stock that you had left?
And and just then my second question is for Tomas.
So you said 2353 emergency vehicles remain operational.
Can you just describe what impact that it's having on the ground because that basically means less than half of your your feet are left operational?
Yeah, thank you for the for the questions.
Look, we don't have precise details of of where these people are as where the most affected people are right now just because of the nature of what's happening with about we estimate around 70,000 people on the move and many more affected by those evacuation orders that are continuing.
The, the, what I was referring to were the populations that were found to be on the verge of, of, of famine just a few weeks ago as a result of the latest IPC reports.
We know that these people can be treated, but they, they need to be, they, they, they need to receive regular assistance over a period of time.
And if that assistance is impacted in any way, then the gains and the stabilisation that have, that have occurred are, are rapidly, rapidly reversed.
So that those are our fears right now.
It won't happen overnight, but it will be an, an inevitable impact of the lack of aid coming in and, and the reduction in distribution.
And indeed we've got about flower supplies, flower supplies left for another 6-6 or so days.
We can stretch that we can back by giving people less and we always have to keep reserves in place for those families that are evacuated.
But really we're talking days now rather than weeks.
And this is under the largest provider of food assistance inside Gaza.
We're not the only one, but other, others are in a in a in a similar situation because everything that we brought in, we we pushed out both because of the but also because of the volumes of supplies coming in as a result of the, the number of trucks in the ceasefire agreement.
Thanks, Olivia for the question.
Well, the, the impact is of course devastating.
I mean, we need to think about the fact that if an ambulance doesn't have gasoline fuel, this means that there are entire communities that are weakened that are people that are calling emergency service and will not get any answer.
And also the frustration on the Palestine Crescent volunteers and staff that are taking those calls many, many times and with an increase in the last days, and they cannot answer to these calls knowing that there is someone on the other side of the call in need of.
Of course, I'm not only talking about injuries of the last bombardments, but also people with medical condition.
Think about having an issue here in Geneva and not being able to have emergency medical service reaching out to you or your families.
So this is what we are facing in Gaza.
I'll go to the platform Bianca Rotiate Global TV Brazil.
Hi, thanks a lot, Alexandra.
I was doing a live, but I don't know if you mentioned already this subject, but the Israeli Defence Minister, Israel Katz said that the army is doing all available pressure on Hamas to release the hostages including implementing President Trump resettlement plan.
So my question to Umrah, to Sam Rose, do you think this kind of action in direction to Trump's resettlement plan, it's already happening on the field?
What like Sinos that maybe evacuation of population could go on that direction And also to Liz if she's there how the OHCRHCDS and there's also another and other threatened from the Israel cats saying that Israel can annex part of the Gaza Strip unless Hamas releases hostages.
So how do you see these these threatens.
I, I, I put myself on on on, on mute and inadvertently look the question from the Brazilian correspondent.
We've seen forced displacement throughout the the war, forced displacement inside of Gaza, hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of people sheltering in, in over 100 unrest schools.
One point I think we had 1.9 million people out of a population of two, just over 2,000,000 displaced.
We're seeing that again, we're seeing, you know, evacuation orders affecting over 100,000 people.
If the conflict continues, we can expect more of that if it takes the same trajectory as the previous conflicts and we see people in and people in the vicinity of those areas.
What we're seeing right now is displacement inside of Gaza.
No moves, of course, towards the border.
And that I believe was the key element of, of, of the Trump plan.
We're focused here on conditions on the ground inside Gaza.
There's not really much I can I can say to speculate on, on element any elements of of of that beyond the border of Gaza.
Sam Eliz is on is with us on the on the podium.
Thank you for your your question.
So moving up to the platform.
I think what you're, you're sort of talking about is, is concerns about what the future may hold.
I think what is really important to stress right now is what we're seeing currently, you know, it is so important that there needs to be a ceasefire.
There needs to be immediate and unconditional release of hostages.
There needs to be as, as, as colleagues have highlighted, the full flow of aid.
So I think from from that point of view, this is, you know, we really need to be stressing what is happening right now.
I don't want to be drawn into conjecture of what might be being planned, what might happen.
I think what we're seeing on the ground right now is horrifying enough and it needs to stop.
And sorry, the the statement, the latest statement that the secretary general made on Gaza, it's exactly saying that that he stresses the need for a ceasefire to be respected, bring around the suffering of the people, humanitarian aid, reach all the people in need.
The hostages released immediately and unconditionally and recalls the international law must be complied with at all times.
And I think we have expressed ourselves several times on what is the political issue of that must be seen for this situation, this conflict.
We've got two more questions and then I would like to go to the Deputy Executive Director of UNICEF who's patiently waiting.
So I give the floor to Yuri Aprelev.
Yuri is our correspondent of University.
My question is for Sam from it is also about the staff, just you say that it is 281.
I just have a question about the missing staff that you have because I know that the number of killed and the number of the staff that you are sure that they are killed.
I wanted to know if you use the the possibility of the ceasefire to find the staff that has disappeared, the staff with who you didn't have contacted during the the hostilities, did you found them and how many of them are still missing?
If we are talking about dozens, hundreds of thousands staff that disappear.
Apologies for a lack any lack of clarity on the number of of staff deaths.
Obviously it's very difficult to ascertain that given how quickly the the situation is evolving.
But for now we are reporting 284 of our of our colleagues who've been killed since the start of of the war.
That's out of a workforce of over over 12,000 people.
We have managed throughout the conflict to keep quite close track on our, on our, on our staff, both those inside of Gaza and, and outside of Gaza through our human resources systems and, and, and mechanisms and, and processing just our communication trees and, and, and things like that.
So we're not envisaging major jumps in numbers.
There is always a slight jump when, when these things happen, when there's a ceasefire as we're able to kind of gather our thoughts and, and reconfirm things.
But no, we're not envisaging many more than that just because of the nature of of our systems.
But we are intending to issue regular updates as this phase of the conflict continues because tragically, we, we, we, we, we, we, we may be facing more staff deaths in the coming days and and hours.
So we'll continue to keep you updated on those new numbers, which as I say, are a bit of a moving target.
Jimmy Keaton, Associated Press.
Alessandra, my question is for Sam.
I wanted to just go back to Nina's question a little bit earlier about whether or not you've seen any pilfering by Hamas of, of aid deliveries.
You, you mentioned in your response that there's no aid deliveries going on right now or distributions.
You should say, I should say the, I think the, the, the statement from the Israeli authorities is more about over time over in the last few weeks and months.
So I just want to be clear on that, that you haven't seen any sign of that over that over the last few weeks.
And then my other question, my, my real question has to do with the Israeli announcement yesterday about how Palestinians will not be within Gaza, will not be able to move into northern Gaza.
What is your read on that?
And what is the response on the ground among the Palestinians in Gaza?
Is that, is that seen as a short term measure or is that a sign of something maybe more worrying for the longer term?
On the question on on a a diversion, I mean, look, what we can say is that there there have been incidents over the course of the war when aid convoys have been looted.
Some of the time just by desperate populations on on the ground at times it appears to have been much more more organised.
But look, we're in a, in a, in a situation here where the only supplies that are coming in are are aid supplies.
Those supplies are, are distributed.
Some of those supplies are are sold on as well at markets.
That's just a reality of the situation here.
But that, that we've not seen anything over the past few weeks and, and, and what we've seen over the war is what has been reported every day on, on, on, on the media in terms of those criminal, criminal elements.
That's all I can say in relation to, to that.
And yeah, anything related to forced displacement, forced evacuation of population is deeply, deeply worrying.
We're not yet seeing anything on the scale of what we saw in October 2023 when, when essentially the entire Gaza Strip was placed, northern Gaza was placed under, under evacuation order.
Again, as as I said to the earlier question, we cannot speculate in, in relation to this, but of course there are fears.
But as this conflict continues, we will see more and more of these evacuation orders.
So it's not out of of the question that this would, would, would happen, but we're focused right now in dealing with the the, the movements that we've had today.
Thank you very much, Sam.
But before we close the issue of Gaza, I would like just to read, as I was asked to do on behalf of Umrah, the post that Mister Ladzarini, the Commissioner General Rumores just published, where he says a deepening humanitarian crisis in the West Bank, with homes and other civilian infrastructure systematically destroyed.
Just yesterday, the Israeli authorities issued new demolition orders for another 66 buildings in Jenin camp.
Dozens of houses have already been destroyed in the camp over the past two months.
These demolition orders must not be carried out.
10s of thousands of Palestine refugees are at risk of renewed long term displacement.
With Janine camp permanently altered and this reference to the West Bank, I would like to connect to the fact that today the Security Council will hold an open briefing followed by callers and consultations on the situation in the Middle East, including the Palestinian question Special Coordinator for the Middle East peace process at interim cigarette COG will deliver the quarterly update on the implementation of resolution 2334 of 23rd December 2016.
This resolution demanded that Israel sees all settlement activity in the OPT, including E Jerusalem and call for immediate steps to prevent violence against civilians, including acts of terror.
And and this the Security Council briefing secret card is suspected to update the council member on the situation in the West Bank.
So thank you very much to some, some thanks for briefing the journalist here for bringing this really direct witness to the correspondent here.
Stay safe, please and come back and update us on the situation in Gaza.
And thanks to the colleagues, to Tomaszo and James and Liz, James Thomaso, you could, sorry, James, you can stay on the podium if you wish.
And we would like now to go to our colleague in Abuja.
I'd like to welcome Kitty Vandeheyden, the UNICEF's Deputy Executive Director, to update us on the global funding crisis as it relates to Ethiopia and Nigeria.
Kitty, thank you very much for your patience and for being with us today.
James, you want to say something or I should I say go straight to to Kitty.
And you know, what can you say after a briefing like the one we just had?
I mean, it's absolutely terrifying what we see on the ground.
So let me just for the sake of argument, also bring a little bit of the art of the possible of what we can do when we get it right.
I mean, just realising that the under 5 mortality has gone down by 60% since the year 1990, that we've been able to reduce, you know, severe acute malnutrition by one third since 2000.
That means 55,000,000 children being alive today.
Just because of simple interventions, we can actually do this.
And just in 2024, UNICEF and of course all of our partners, we were able to.
Reach 441 million children to prevent malnutrition and treated 9 million children to treat acute malnutrition.
So there are ways in which we can still be optimistic if we know that we can do it.
And of course, we don't do this alone.
As UNICEF, it's critically important for me to understand that these figures that we are very, very proud of, we do that together with our partners, our partners across the government, philanthropy, the private sector.
And with that support, we as UNICEF and our partners, we've been able to be that conveyor belt, conveyor belt, I would say, to child survival, to child well-being, to realising their rights, to realising their full potential.
But the reason I am here today is really to talk about the risk that these gains are being rolled back, that we see a global retreat, if you will, from the donor community, from the art of the possible, from the art of investment in children that is the future.
And that we see funding cuts across a multiple sort of a cohort of donors.
And it's not just the quantity, the absolute envelope of the funding cuts, but it's the nature and how these decisions are being made, very acute, very unexpected, which does not give us an ability as UNICEF to mitigate the risks if critical life saving support is cut off.
It is the fact that it's a cumulative set of donors that are doing this that really risks to roll back that progress that I was talking about just now.
And the the consequences, if you will, of these decisions have impacts on real children, real lives every day in the here and now.
And I was in Ethiopia earlier this week and I went to visit the Maiduguri up NE here in Nigeria to witness what is possible but also to witness what is at risk.
And due to funding shortages for both countries, what we currently see is that about 1.3 million children risk to lose access to life saving support.
Our UTF are ready to use therapeutic food during the course of this year.
Let me tell you what we do in a place like Afar in Ethiopia, the dry northeastern lowlands of Ethiopia, where we were running 13 mobile health clinics, health and nutrition clinics to serve very destitute populations, pastoralist communities, communities on the move.
And with these mobile clinics, we were meeting them where they are.
You open up a sheet under a shaded tree and you treat and diagnose pregnant and lactating mothers and children with the bare minimum of what they need.
This is about vitamin A and iron deficiency for pregnant mothers.
It is treating malaria, it's treating TB, it's treating pneumonia, it's treating malnutrition and a combination the Co morbidity of these issues.
Malaria and malnutrition are often deadly unless they are treated in time.
It's simple, it's effective, but currently these services for children and for mothers are in peril.
Out of the 30 mobile health and nutrition clinics that we were running in this region, drought prone, very destitute, very poor, currently only seven are still operating.
The consequences of these decisions, because this shortage 23 taken out of operation was due to funding cuts, have real live consequences for children and for mothers.
We know what is possible, we know what to do, but we have to be allowed to then also do it beyond Afar.
Overall, in Ethiopia, we estimate that without new funding coming in, we risk to lose our supply chain of our UTF, our UTF ready to use therapeutic food to treat children that suffer from the most acute forms of malnutrition.
Without new funding, we will run out of our supply chain by May and that means that 70,000 children in Ethiopia depend on this type of treatment cannot be served.
And you'll recall from Sam just now, this is continuous treatment that is required.
Interruption is life threatening.
In Nigeria, we face the same situation.
80,000 children every month needs this type of support.
We risk here in Nigeria to run out of surprise anywhere between this month and May.
And for me, it's important that it's not just about the treatment.
We have to be able to prevent it getting to this stage.
I was in a hospital 2 days ago in my degree with a child so malnourished.
That's the level of malnutrition that we're seeing here.
We have to be able to invest in prevention by community mobilisation, by early screening, by breastfeeding classes, by early referrals, by nutrient supplementation for pregnant mothers.
And currently, not just us, but also the partners with whom we work, local partners, because of funding cuts, are unable to provide that type of early support to prevent a child like Moussa being completely unresponsive and probably at this stage, no longer alive.
And of course, this funding crisis isn't just about Nigeria and Ethiopia, which is as bad as it gets.
This is happening all over the world and all over the world.
It's children that bear the brunt of decisions in capitals and even a brief halt in these life saving support services that we provide are critical.
And the needs are rising.
It's not as if retreat is related to a reduction in the need, right?
On the contrary, needs are rising.
We anticipate just in 2025 that we need to serve 213 million children in 146 countries with life saving humanitarian support.
And so as needs are rising, we need the global community to step up to the plate, to rise to the occasion, to keep investing in the art of the possible.
We have to stay and deliver as UNICEF.
We will not retreat, but we need to be enabled.
We need to be able to get to that level of a conveyor belt because our funders do not retreat on children.
And so I'm here to really call on through you all, governments that are looking at where they prioritise their budgetary allocations, that they continue to invest in children, that they continue to prioritise, I would say the future, the potential of children as an economically rational decision, or else this funding crisis will become a child survival crisis and we cannot allow that to happen.
Thank you very much, Kitty.
This is really a strong appeal that you're doing here.
So I'll open the floor to question in the room first.
Yeah, Thank you very much for the for the briefing.
I was wondering if you could say, I mean, you, you painted a pretty stark picture with a lot of a lot of numbers and, and children who won't be served.
Do you have an estimate of how many children will actually die if you can't get your supply lines working in these places?
And also, if you could say, I mean, you say UNICEF is going to keep keep working, but you also have a pretty dire funding crisis as as you mentioned, how, how can you navigate that?
We sorry we don't have the exact numbers also because the situation keeps on changing.
So governments take certain decisions and then come back because of the arguments that we put forward that we cannot fail children.
So we don't have the full estimate of the mortality numbers that we will see, but that the consequence of every retreat of investments in children's lives and well-being or acute, that is absolutely certain.
And we're seeing that governments are hearing us, but we're also calling on that was your second question.
We will stay and deliver with as much as we can.
We are calling out all governments, but also philanthropic organisations, also individuals, corporates, but also national governments in the Global South to step up to the plate to allow us together collectively to keep serving children.
And if you just look at this country, here in Nigeria, the Minister of Health, Mohammed Kathy to together with the President to decision to free up an additional $200 million to invest in critical life saving support in the health systems to at least to be able at least to cushion the blow.
But we will keep arguing with every government, every individual, every corporate and philanthropic organisation is that we cannot fail children.
I was wondering if you could, can you hear me?
I was just wondering if you could comment on the way these funding cuts have been carried out.
There have been other agencies have also mentioned the fact that, that this sort of very abrupt halt without giving countries the chance to, to step in and and fill, fill the gaps has been quite devastating.
And I'm wondering if you could also say something about the the, the way the funding cuts have been carried out.
Look, we respect all our partners that have invested in us in the partnership with us to allow us to deliver for children and with many of the donors that are now taking these decisions.
We've had partnerships for decades and the fact that we have been able to achieve these impressive results was really due to that long term partnership.
That's why it was very difficult for us to accept that changes were made.
Decisions were made almost overnight because that led to interruption of services and an inability for us to adapt and to mitigate risks for children.
Those are the discussions that are of course, still ongoing because we are arguing that we cannot fail children and we will continue to put forward the arguments that this partnership is a partnership that needs to continue until the job is done, which means that children survive, children thrive, and children have a pathway to a life in dignity.
And UNICEF cannot do that alone.
We have to do that together.
So we're arguing not just for no sudden cuts.
We're arguing for no cuts.
In fact, we need to see the contrary.
We need to see investments in the future so that we can keep children safe.
We invest in resilient communities.
And through that, we invest in economic growth in countries where that is so much needed.
Other questions in the room.
Thank you very much Kitty, I just wanted to clarify the 1.3 million children at risk of losing access to life saving support that is across both countries, right.
And of all these cuts that you're seeing, is there one particular area of of greatest concern?
I I'm conscious that a lot of agencies now are talking about really having to prioritise the most critical forms of support.
Is there 1 area of particular concern from some of the examples that you've given and any anecdotes in terms of how people are taking that news on the ground will be helpful.
Because I think sometimes we forget that it's, it's, it is everyday people and they realise being disrupted by.
So any kind of colour on that would be, would be helpful.
Look, I am, I'm concerned overall because I think there is still a willingness in the donor community to come together for life saving support.
That life saving support is nowhere near where it needs to be.
And that predates the funding crisis we have traditionally had as a humanitarian community, not just UNICEF, insufficient funds to treat and keep children alive for decades.
So it's only getting worse now it's getting more acute and that is troubling.
1 is really the need for an RUTF pipeline.
We need critical surprise to treat severe acute malnourished children because any interruption in that treatment is literally life threatening.
So that's one second, I do believe that we will be unable to have sufficient supplies if we do not invest in prevention.
As I mentioned in Community mobilisation very early screening, children should not get to this stage because we know how to prevent it with simple, cheap methodologies that we have developed with our partners over decades.
We just need that bit of investment in terms of how people are taking it.
I mean, if you, I don't know if you have children, but if you're holding a child that is about to die of a totally preventable, treatable disease, it is nothing short of heartbreaking.
We should not allow the global community to fail children in this way.
I will also say, and we were just talking about the terrible situation for for Andhra staff that in some places where we are as a humanitarian community, in desperate situations, for example, in the in the camps with Rohingyas, the level of funding shortage has now become a security risk for staff because of the cutbacks.
So this is also becoming an issue for our staff, for our ability to reach people where they are.
And this is what we desperately want to do.
So there are ripple effects from life saving all the way to our ability to serve.
But also our local partners have often been cut off of funding.
They are in the capillaries of society.
We need them to be with children where they are.
So it is a whole collective of impact that is creating, as I say, if we this funding crisis risks to become, if it isn't already a child survival crisis that is totally preventable and that's what we cannot allow to happen.
Thank you very much, Kitty.
I'll go to the next question since I don't see the room.
Oh, there is a question in the room, then I'll go to the platform.
There are quite a few more ones.
So John Zaracosas is our correspondent of France van Katter and The Lancet.
I was wondering if you could elaborate a little bit in your messaging, your thoughts as a former director general on international cooperation for the Netherlands, Your message to European leaders.
We've heard a lot about the cutbacks in the United States.
What more can European countries do to help prevent this emerging crisis for children globally?
As I said, it's never just one donor, right?
It is about the cumulative effect of the donor community writ large where we see a retreat from the dream of a life in dignity, from our global commitment as a global community in the dream of the SDGS.
And I believe it's not just up to Europe, it's up to the global community.
It's up to everybody that as needs are rising, we know what to do, that we step up to the plate, that we continue to invest in the art of the future, which is the children, and to not fail them at the moment when they need it most.
These consequences will come back to haunt US.
Countries cannot grow, communities cannot become resilient unless we invest in children, not just with medical and nutritional supplies, with education, with child protection, with social protection, together with the government partners.
If we retreat now as a global community, including Europe, that will have devastating consequences for decades to come.
So I was actually in Europe before I came here to Ethiopia and Nigeria to argue with two countries, including my own countries, to please step up to the plate.
As needs are rising, we cannot withdraw.
We have to rise to the occasion as a donor community to allow not just UNICEF, but the UN writs large, the multilateral system to function and to do for what it was intended, and that is to save critical lives and to provide pathways to a life in dignity.
So we're calling on every partner, not just European, but also our partners in Canada, in Japan, in Korea, everywhere, to step up to the plate.
We can only do this together.
This is not just one person's or one country's responsibility.
This is the global responsibility.
That is how the SDGS were shaped and we cannot deliver as UNICEF without the global community joining us in that fight.
And let me add to what you said, Kitty, that in his address to the press yesterday, the Secretary General really recognised the the Central Strategic Partnership of the European Union with the United Nations and expresses gratefulness for the continued support, both financial support and political support to the activities of the UN.
He said we believe that European Union is a fundamental pillar of the multilateral response to the challenges we face in peace, security, climate, sustainable development and human rights.
And he concluded by saying that in all these moments of crisis that he described before, I'm absolutely sure that the EU and the UN will be together fighting for a better international community in a safer planets.
I'll go to the platform now.
Thank you, Alessandra, and thank you for for, for coming to see us.
You just said you, you, you said that it's never just one donor, but I'm looking at your website and from 2023, which was the most recent on your website, funding from the United States was $1.4 billion and which is just under twice that of the #2 donor, which was Germany.
So the United States does make a very significant chunk of your funding.
And, and as an American, I can, I can say that, you know, the brand name of UNICEF in the United States is quite well known, probably the best known of any UN agency.
And of course your relationship on Capitol Hill has been strong over the years.
You've been led by Americans on a number of occasions, including currently and, and and there's.
So my question for you is we, we haven't heard so much about the impact of the US funding freezes and cuts on UNICEF in so much as we've had for other agencies like IOM or UNHCR for example.
So could you please tell us what is the specific amount of money that is destined to UNICEF that has been either cut or frozen under these US recent moves and what staff reductions have either been announced or are expected in the near future?
Thanks for that question.
Let me let me say from the outset that the United States has been a phenomenal partner of UNICEF.
Both the government and the people of the United States have invested heavily and they can take a huge credit on the results that we have achieved with that funding.
Now, of course, because it is such a large partner, because that partnership runs so deep and it's so effective when decisions are taken, obviously it has a huge impact.
We're monitoring every day what the impact is.
I will say we haven't come out with figures because that reality changes almost by the day.
So what I'll tell you today will be changed by tomorrow.
We've had suspensions, then we had waivers, we had partial waivers, we had terminations, terminations being rescinded.
So can I give you that figure?
At the moment, the answer is no.
Can I give you a figure in terms of how many staff specifically have been impacted by the US funding cuts?
The answer to that is known.
Can I tell you that we are investing heavily in arguing the case with the United States leadership that UNICEF is actually serving the United States interest to keep the world a safe place, particularly for children, but not just for children, for communities right large.
And that it is important to continue to invest in that partnership in the art of what is possible in terms of child survival and children thriving towards mature adults that can contribute to economic growth, safety and security.
Those discussions are ongoing.
As I said, figures are changing almost by the day.
But it was a wonderful partnership.
It is a wonderful partnership and we are hoping to grow that partnership because we, as UNICEF, need every partner, including the United States, to fight for the survival and the dignity of children, to realise their rights.
We cannot do this just with Europe.
We need everybody on board because every child needs to survive and thrive.
And that is the conversations that will continue on the Hill with the White House.
Wherever we can, we will do that across Europe.
We will do that with all of our partners.
We need the big partners.
We need everybody on board because this cannot become a child survival crisis.
That's why we're fighting so hard.
Christian Erich, the German news agency.
I have a question that's a bit difficult, I guess, Kitty, but since you are so, so engaged, I'm sure you have a good answer to this.
What I'm asked to explain by my readers and users is that of course we hear about the devastating emergencies and the malnutrition and that shocks all of us.
But does this not also mean that investments in the past have not been successful and have not have the intended effect?
Because the children that were supported 10 years ago today are not able to, are not resilient and and the their communities are not growing and they cannot provide for the families.
As you just said, the nutritional supplements are needed on a constant basis.
Apart from the emergencies, what is going wrong in the investments that the situation doesn't seem to be getting any better?
Look, I mean, it's always complicated in the development arena.
I mean, I don't know if you were there from the beginning, but let's be very honest that together with our partners, including Germany, we have made a huge difference in the lives of millions of children treating malnutrition.
We are currently at at at gender equality in the education system.
We have rolled back polio to almost eradicate, to being eradicated at the beginning what we have achieved success.
So I will not stand for a conclusion that we have not been successful.
But it doesn't mean that it is an easy ride and it doesn't mean that we don't have mounting challenges.
We, as UNICEF ended 2024 with a campaign, and I advise you to take a look at that, which is that 2024 was the anis horibilis for children across a whole range of metrics and statistics.
This was the worst year for children since UNICEF was established.
Not because aid was not effective, but because we are having more conflicts now than ever since the Second World War.
Children are still reeling from the impacts of COVID and many children in the developing world were unable to access digital education and were unable to receive medical care.
We are seeing in regions where I was both here in Nigeria and in Ethiopia, increased impacts of climate change, longer droughts, more frequent droughts with more dramatic impacts in levels of malnutrition, but equally a rise in flooding, waterborne and vector borne diseases.
So it is not easy to keep all children safe.
That is why we're calling on the global community to stick together because we know we can do it.
So we're up against a lot of challenges that are not caused by children, but that children cannot stop and that where children suffer the brunt of the price they pay the price for climate change, for conflicts, for communicable diseases.
And we need to keep them safe.
That is what we are trying to do as UNICEF, but we need support for that, including Germany support.
Germany is our second largest donor and I I really hope that the government, once they take their decisions, will be reminded of the art of the possible, that when you invest in children, you build resilient communities and you grow your economy.
This is a win win proposition.
So let's make sure that that becomes the reality.
Gabriela Sotomayor, processor, Mexican media.
Thank you very much, Alessandra.
So speaking about children's right, it would be very, very interesting and much appreciated if UNICEF would could hold a press conference on the impact of the US cuts on children's right in other parts of the world, for example, in Latin America, a region that has made a progress.
But with this cuts, it could be, you know, it could go backwards, backwards.
Look, let me let me confer with my colleagues whether and how we can do that.
I understand the request to be more specific.
So let me refer back to you.
I'll consult with our colleagues in, in headquarters and, and take this with me as an as a good idea.
This concludes the questions we had here for you.
I'd like to thank you so very much for being here to tell us about this extremely dire situation and I really hope your appeal will be heard.
We will continue talking about the problems of funding cuts later on with the Eugene for UNHCR and we will hear more about that on Monday where we will have a press conference on the impact of US funding cuts.
But that will be on the HIV response with Winnie Biannema, the UN AIDS Executive Director and with Anjali Akreyar Akreykhar, sorry Unit's Deputy Executive Director.
So I've also reminded you of this.
That will be on Monday at 12 noon in this press room.
Again, good luck with your important work and thanks, James, for being with us.
Let me go to the other big subject of our briefing, which is Ukraine.
I've got with me Liz Thruster for OHCHROHCHR, which launched a report on the impact of the conflict and occupation in children's rights.
So we stay with children.
Yes, good morning, everyone.
Yes, indeed, I think it's been a morning where we've really focused on the rights of children, which is really crucial and you know, cannot be said often enough.
The UN Human Rights office has this morning issued a report that details how death, injury and lasting family separation are among the traumatic events that have upended the lives of Ukraine's children in the three years since the Russian Federation launched its full scale invasion.
The ongoing hostilities and occupation of parts of Ukraine by the Russian Federation have caused large scale human rights violations and inflicted unimaginable suffering on millions of children.
Their rights have been undermined in every aspect of life, leaving deep scars both physical and psychological.
Between the 24th of February 2022 and the 31st of December 2020, four 669 children were killed and 1833 injured, many as a result of the extensive use of explosive weapons in populated areas.
Of these, 521 were killed and 1529 injured in territory controlled by Ukraine, and 148 were killed and 304 injured in currently occupied territory.
The actual numbers are likely much higher.
Vast areas of Ukraine are now littered with landmines and explosive remnants of war, posing long term risks to children's lives and safety.
As of December 2024, an estimated 737,000 children had been internally displaced by the hostilities.
A further 1.7 million were refugees, many of them separated from a parent, usually their father.
Since annexing 4 regions of Ukraine in late 2022 in breach of international law, the Russian Federation authorities have made sweeping and profound changes to laws, institutions and governance there directly affecting children and their human rights.
They have imposed Russian citizenship and the Russian school curriculum, while also restricting any access to education in the Ukrainian language.
They've prioritised military patriotic training at school and in youth groups, exposing children to war propaganda.
These changes violate international humanitarian law, which obliges the occupying power to protect children, respect their national identity, and maintain the continuity of their education and culture.
During the period under review, there were at least 1614 attacks that destroyed or damaged schools.
The Ukrainian authorities have implemented a broad range of measures, including requiring schools to have bomb shelters or to deliver classes online.
Frequent air raid alerts disrupt classes, and attacks by Russian armed forces on Ukraine's energy infrastructure have caused repeated power outages that shut down online classes, which were attended either fully or partially by more than 1/3 of Ukrainian children.
It's clear that Ukrainian children have endured a wide range of wartime experiences, all with serious impacts, some as refugees, others as direct victims under continued ****** of bombardment, and many subject to the coercive laws and policies of the Russian authorities in occupied areas.
As our report makes clear, acknowledging and addressing violations are essential to ensure a future where all Ukrainian children can reclaim their rights, identity and security free from the enduring consequences of war and occupation.
Just to also note that the **** Commissioner will be delivering an oral update on Ukraine next week on Friday, the 28th of March.
Thank you very much, Liz, this really important report and I'll open the floor to question now in the room.
Liz, I was wondering if you had any reaction to the fact that the US has has closed down the service or the the Research Institute that was looking into the the missing children or the children who have been taken to Russia.
And if you have any insight into to the numbers there.
And if if your report also looks at at that issue, the report makes mention of the, the the children that that were either transferred within occupied territory or, or, or to Russia.
It is something that that our colleagues working on Ukraine in the human rights monitoring mission in Ukraine have have reported previously in, in, in their periodic reports.
I think back in 2023, they highlighted that they documented the cases of of some 200 children, many of them living in institutions who had been apparently transferred in this way.
But one of the things to stress in relation to this issue and also with other issues is that we don't have access to those areas.
So that makes sort of following up and establishing exactly what happened very difficult.
There is reference in the report to the issue of tracing children, which is so important, hugely challenging all round.
It also highlights the cases of some some parents who've actually themselves tried to go and and find the children often at great risk and expense.
So it is an issue that, that we know that, that that came into of the media spotlight quite a while ago and that it, it remains and, and it is something that is mentioned in the report.
But as I, I must stress, we're, we're not in a position to really have have much more information than what we've already publicly said.
Nina, is there a request for follow up?
I'm just wondering on the on the the programme that that had existed in the US trying to trace these these children and find them.
Is that something that your office has relied on in terms of source and is that going to make it more difficult if that no longer exists?
That's a good point, Nina, as to whether to what degree colleagues may have been been getting information from that.
But I think it is really important to_the the the importance and the huge challenge of tracing children.
But let me check specifically on on what links colleagues in the human rights monitoring mission in Ukraine may have had with this institute.
So thank you for raising that.
If there are no other question in the room, I'll go to the platform and I see Yuri.
Liz, I, I have read the report and there is a moment that I didn't understood the .29.
You are saying that Russian authorities have reported that 27 children have been killed and 137 injured inside the Russian Federation, but you have not been able to verify these cases and that's why they are not included in the overall number.
If I understand well, it was not included because you don't have access to the Russian territory, but at the same time you are including the the children that are killed and injured in the territories under the Russian control.
So I don't understand why this difference, why when you don't have access on one side, you are including it and not for the other things.
As you rightly highlight in in paragraph 28 for the report, it is it is talking about children, 27 children that have been killed in the Russian Federation.
But what I think is important to_is that the human rights monitoring mission in Ukraine Has had a a, a, long established methodology of of, verifying civilian casualties in Ukraine So.
That is why we have consistently in our reports referred to what has been happening in in, in, government controlled territory and what is territory that that is occupied by the Russian Federation So.
That is why the the figures are presented this way of.
Course the colleagues who put together the, the report thought it was important to to sort of highlight, I think we have an issue on the line.
It is a mic which is open.
So, so I'm just sort of trying to explain the, the, the why the, the report is presented this way.
We have consistently had civilian casualty reporting from government controlled territory.
And based on, on our, our previous work at, based on our methodology, we have civilian casual report reporting on occupied territory.
But, but we do make it clear in the report that we do know that, that children have been killed in the Russian Federation.
And I think it is important to put that in there.
But we have not been able to verify these cases or the circumstances in which they occurred.
Hence they're not included in the overall number of verified casualties.
And that's important to also_we're talking about verified casualties.
And as I said earlier, the numbers that that we have of, of children, actually of, of civilians overall are likely much higher.
Thank you very much, Gabriella.
On March 13, I sent an e-mail to your office asking for a comment on the extermination camp found in Mexico.
It had crematoriums apparently with authorities acquiescence.
It's a very, very, it's a horrible case.
So you, you said that you will send your comments later, but you, you didn't until the next day.
And then you tweeted about this, but you didn't send me the tweet.
So I, I would like to know why what happened because you know, that is very important for me, the situation in Mexico.
And my question is if you have any?
Update on this horrible case If you have an estimate of, of the number of children displaced by organised crime and how many children have been killed and affected by violence crime in Mexico.
Well, as you may recall, we did actually issue a, a, a comment on, on what had been happening or what was reported to have happened at the the ranch in Mexico.
And, and I did highlight to you that we were putting this out.
It is something that that, as you quite rightly say is, is, you know, it continues to, to receive a lot of coverage in, in Mexico precisely because in a way it was, you know, so such a horrific scenario that was discovered there.
Our, our Mexico office obviously is, is following it very closely.
We, we really, you know, I've worked very much on, on, you know, the, the enforces appearances, the disappearances, the missing in, in Mexico.
So that is something that we've really are following that we are aware we are our Mexico office is obviously, you know, constantly ready to offer its knowledge and expertise to accompany the efforts of the authorities in investigating this.
And of course to help the the victims, the families of those who who may have been caught up in this, who who may have indeed been killed.
I think with regard to the number of children killed by organised crime in Mexico that that would possibly be quite a hard statistic to come by.
I can certainly check with with colleagues if they have any sort of evaluation, but that seems quite a a a difficult statistic to to have, but we can certainly check.
Is he Gabriel, as a follow up?
Yes, thank you very much.
Yeah, I would appreciate if you highlight, you know, and maybe the next briefing or I don't know, the situation in Mexico because I think my colleagues are not aware of the horrific things are that are happening, happening in Mexico regarding great violence by violence, as of, you know, of human rights displaced people by the organised crime, but but without authorities acquiescence.
That's that's the the problem.
So it would be very, very appreciated if you talk about this issue in Mexico during the briefings or, you know, in a conference.
Yeah, your interest obviously is, is well understood and noted.
Thanks, Elise, for this update and thanks for everybody's patience to follow us until now.
And it's not finished because we have Eugene now with us, Eugene Yun for UNHCR also about funding cuts as we said.
And we saw the very important message from Filippo Grande, the **** Commissioner yesterday on the subject.
Thank you very much colleagues.
So today I bring the critical funding gaps which are severely hampering humanitarian efforts in Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo and beyond, leaving 1000 without life saving and pushing an already dire humanitarian situation closer to catastrophe.
In last than three months, the number of Congolese linked to neighbouring country from eastern DRC has surged past 100,000.
Already ongoing hostility in North Kivu, particularly Masisinwali Kali territory, along with the extreme volatile security situation in Bukavu and the surrounding areas in South Kivu have a forced 100 of 1000 of a civilian to flee again.
The destruction of a displaced displacement sites which I mentioned a month ago in Eastern DRC has left 1000 with nowhere to shelter, forcing them flee in desperation in and around of Goma.
I'm repeat, all displacement sites previously home to 400,000 internally displaced person have been destroyed completely, leaving families completely stranded without protection.
The situation is becoming unbearable, pushing many to move even further South and cross-border.
Yet due to a funding cut, humanitarian partners are struggling to rebuild shelters, leaving displaced people with even fewer option for survivor.
Since January, more than 40,000 Idps from North and South Kivu have arrived in Kalimi, Tanganika province, after apparently 700 kilometre journey, forced to navigate the treacherous route controlled by different armed groups and many have risked their lives travelling through a conflict zone and across the dangerous lakes.
Among them are use fling forced conscription into armed groups and women and children separated from their family in the chaos of a displacement.
So this crisis is becoming more and more the the crisis of children and youth.
The desperation of the journey has led to devastating a tragedy.
Overcrowded and fragile boat that they took.
Often the only means of crossing vast waterways have a capsized claiming the lives of some who had hope for safety.
Survivors, especially for children and youth arriving in Kalimi, bear the trauma of a witnessing loved one parish along the way.
UNHTCR, the UN Refugee Agency, civil society and local government could rapidly help these displaced people through shelter, construction, the distribution of essential aid such as a blanket, the mosquito net, and the hygiene kit and soap.
However, funding constraint have made a proper emergency response to nearly impossible.
For example, there were only 147 blankets in UNHC emergency stock in Kalimi as a replenishment could not proceed when funds were frozen at the beginning of this year.
The situation in neighbouring Uganda and Burundi is almost as dire.
More than 28,000 Congolese refugee have so far crossed into Uganda since January this year, a 500% increase from the same time last year, with another 10,000 people expected to arrive by the end of this month.
Report from new arrival indicates a desperate flight from conflict and horrific human rights violations.
Most reception centre and Tranji centre in Uganda are currently hosting 7 times more than their capacity, lacking sufficient water, sanitation and shelter.
Therefore, funding cuts have left health centre overwhelmed with the child malnutrition soaring due to the termination of a feeding centres in area.
Hosting Congolese new arrival in Burundi's Rugombo commune hosting the majority of the 68,000 Congolese refugee who have arrived in the country since February.
Inadequate sanitation facility in overcrowded in and around the stadium where people are sheltering as well as the limited healthcare have resulted in at least 8 suspected cases of cholera being identified.
Already a new site to host a refugee arrival is already over its capacity.
We are also witness witnessing services for refugee with additional protection needs including over 400 unaccompanied and separated children and the survivors of sexual violence is under a strain.
We are grateful to those donor who have a committee support so that your NHSR and partner can ramp up a response effort in the DRC and neighbouring countries, but the growing needs far exceed available resource right now.
Thank you very much, Eugene.
I'm looking at the room for questions.
When one of your colleagues spoke recently, they were talking about a stadium which was really overpopulated and there were, you know, attempts to try and move people to elsewhere.
Could you just give an update on on the on the situation there?
And are people still there?
What are the conditions like?
The situation is just still dire as we are seeing the photo that coming from the stadium which we can share.
So there as I mentioned that the cholera case already identified and then health service is completely limited, overwhelmed.
We're trying to move them to the new site as soon as possible.
But also as I mentioned that the new site we identified and trying to move them is already over capacity.
So we are heavily depend on the really hostility of of the Burundian government.
But they cannot do themselves.
We're talking about 68,000 people staying in and around the stadium because even stadium is overcrowded.
So people are just staying wherever they can and the healthcare system is really have to be established in the new side as well as the stadium as while we're moving people to the safer and then the where they can receive the basic services.
And we go to the platform.
Thank you, Alessandra and thank you Eugene for the for the for the comments.
My question was a bit broader.
I wanted to kind of follow up on the statement that came out from from the **** Commissioner yesterday more broadly about just generally the, the what he called or what your statement yesterday said were brutal funding cuts in the humanitarian sector that's impacting UNHCRS operations.
Could you provide a little bit more depth to that today?
And I'd also like to just follow up as well on a report that came out last evening from Devex, which specifically mentioned comments that Mister Grandy made to to staff yesterday.
If you could confirm that he did make a statement like that and if and what kind of staffing cuts are expected at UNHCR?
We've got Matt to answer this brother question.
Thanks very much for the question, Jamie.
And as you mentioned, our **** Commissioner did issue a statement yesterday, of course, that we know that we're not alone among agencies in delivering this kind of devastating message.
You've heard already this morning something very similar from our colleagues, UNICEF.
I think overall, what we'd like to say is that the biggest concern that we have is, of course, in all of this for refugees, for the displaced, they will be feeling the brunt of these cuts.
And as our **** Commissioner said, lives will tragically be lost as a result.
People will die, programmes will shutter, offices will close and of course assistance will not be able to pass.
Then of course, there are our colleagues who are going to be impacted.
These are extremely dedicated people.
They do this work not as is sometimes suggested, because it's easy or pampered work.
They do this work because they are hugely dedicated people and many of them, of course, have made the ultimate sacrifices.
A significant number of them will lose their jobs.
To your specific question, Jamie, we don't have an answer.
We're in the same position as UNICEF.
We are just now undertaking a review of our operations that encompasses our headquarters but also our entire field network.
We will conduct that review as soon as we possibly can and then the results will be implemented.
Once we have those results, we can come back and let you know, but sadly, colleagues will.
Of course, some colleagues will of course lose their jobs.
I think also similar to what you heard this morning, we have been in a situation of underfunding for many years.
This is not new, but unfortunately it's a new layer on top of what's been going on for a long time.
If we look at some of our situations, the funding levels for those from last year, even before the current situation, our appeal for Yemen was 29% funded last year, Central African Republic 36% funded, Myanmar 40% funded.
So you see that we were already going into this situation in a very, very challenging spot.
We're not interested in criticising our donors.
They make the decisions that they make.
We're trying to do what we can to adjust to those decisions and to ensure that the impact on displaced people is minimised.
You can see on our website that the vast majority of our funds, some 99% of those funds are from voluntary contributions.
So what we're doing now is we're pushing out and we're trying to accelerate bringing on new donors to come on, but also asking existing donors if they can accelerate their funding.
Some people ask us, well, why have you ended up in this position?
We've been aware that we're reliant on a relatively small number of donors.
We've been trying to diversify that funding base for some time.
It's not an easy process.
A couple of years ago at the height of the Ukraine crisis, I think we were relatively successful in bringing on more private sector donors.
For that year, 2022, we got over a billion dollars in receipts from from private donors.
Unfortunately, that situation, that level of funding from the private sector has fallen significantly.
But we hope it can pick up and I think one thing that does encourage us is the fact that we know there is a groundswell of support for people forced to flee out there that gives us confidence.
We know that many people are very sympathetic to the plight of refugees and and are aware that their numbers have been growing in recent years.
The cuts in aid that are happening and will happen in the months to come are of course impacting our refugee programmes right across the world.
We can't say that there's anyone particular region that's going to be more impacted than others.
Further cuts to areas will be inevitable and again a similar with the job situation, we can't say which areas will be more or less impacted at this stage.
Again, it's a question of of having that review and looking at where the money is most urgently needed and where it can be deployed.
But what we can say is there is of course, some 120 million forcibly displaced and stateless people worldwide, and they will suffer dire consequences as a result of the disruptions in supply of critical medicines, food, emergency shelter, relief items, clean water and protection services.
And I think like our colleagues at UNICEF, we will of course, continue to engage constructively with the US administration while we at the same time attempt to secure new sources of funding.
I think just finally, it could be useful for you reporting on this to give you a couple of examples of where the impact has been felt already.
And of course, there will be more examples in the months to come, But already we can say, for example, in South Sudan, only 25% of the dedicated spaces supported by UNHCR for women and girls at risk of violence are currently operational.
So 75% have had to be cut already.
And that has left some 80,000 people without accesses, access to services like emergency psychosocial support and legal and medical assistance.
Likewise in Ethiopia, over 200,000 refugees and internally displaced people no longer have access to life saving services.
And that includes a safe house that used to host women in immediate danger of being killed.
Obviously the situation there has been very difficult for a long time.
It's another situation that was already chronically underfunded.
You have a million refugees crammed into a very small space and they are completely dependent on humanitarian assistance.
On Monday, we'll be putting out a joint press release with colleagues, with other agencies on the funding situation and an appeal for Bangladesh.
Just a couple of other examples before I wrap up.
In Turkey at least six partner field offices are set to close alongside 7 community centres which will affect around 100 partner staff.
And in Europe we know that working with local organisations and refugee LED organisations is absolutely crucial in terms of the localisation agenda of our agency, but also the broader United Nations.
And there in Europe we had budgeted for some 80 grant agreements with community based and refugee LED organisations, but going forward only 16 of these will be prioritised for 2025.
So we will need to let go of some of the important work that we do that we will do.
But our **** Commissioner has stressed that our work will continue and that our mandate will endure through this difficult.
This Jimmy has an as a follow up.
Just wanted to answer to the question by and yes, in the charts.
I was asking for the notes on DRCI think go ahead Eugene, thank you.
It's already out, but we can we can re share if you haven't received yet.
Thank you for that elaborate response and I appreciate it.
Just wanted to do very quickly if I could.
A couple of weeks ago The Associated Press and presumably others reported information from you in HCR that your first cost saving efforts will involve cutting 300 million in planned activity, $300 million.
Is that still the figure that you're you're going on or has that changed?
And just very quickly, you mentioned a groundswell of support for people on the move.
How is that financially manifest itself?
I mean the groundswell of support has that has that meant contributions from from whether it be NGOs or charities or or individuals, have you seen a concrete impact of that groundswell of support?
On the first point, in terms of the cost saving measures that we've already had to implement, it is some 9% of the budget that we had allocated this year for emergencies at the start of this year.
We'll obviously have to update that once the review has been done.
And then your second question, I think I was talking really about the groundswell of support among the broader public, among the broader population.
We see it in terms of membership of civil society organisations, people who mobilise when there are big displacement situations.
So I think it's now for us and our partner organisations to try to make sure that that groundswell of support is translated into increased financial donations for us, but also for all the other key partners and international NGOs that are doing such important work throughout the world for displaced people.
Yeah, there are people waiting on the platform.
The Gabriella and Katrina have been patiently waiting and I go to you, Gabriella.
Yes, thank you very much.
So right now it seems that the UN programmes, not only UNCHCR, but the UN programmes depend on the will of one man, Donald Trump.
So do you think the world is aware of this?
Is your message reaching the people?
Because I don't know, maybe I'm kind of childish, but imagine if each adult donated $0.50 a month or something like that.
Have you thinking about another way to fund your programmes?
Thanks for the question, Gabriel.
Of course it's, it's now well known that we have been, as have other UN agencies, highly dependent on one donor.
That puts us in a difficult position right now.
So it's very important that we get the message out far and wide.
And we trust on you and and other colleagues in the media to help us with this, to say that it is important now that individuals, that the private sector, but also that that other governments and governmental organisations can perhaps step up and help us so that the impact of these cuts can be minimal, minimalised.
I think that's also what the secretary general expressed on several occasions that it it it beyond the the issue of 1234 donors, everybody has to step up and contribute because as Mr Trump put it, sorry, Mr Trump, Mr Grundy put it up yesterday.
He spoke about the crisis of responsibility.
I think this is a very important way of approach to to the situation in which we are now.
He said the cost of inaction will be measured in suffering, instability and lost futures.
And this is for all the activities that the United Nations are carrying out for the most, most vulnerable.
Katherine, thanks for your patience.
And then I'll go to Nina and Olivia again.
My mic is not much better now.
Would you kindly share the notes you read about the situation at U NHCR?
Secondly, as the President of Akanu, I would like to kindly suggest that the humanitarian agencies all together or UNHER alone would accept to come and talk about about the situation on or off the records to the press.
You just mentioned that that we can help you.
Gabby suggested something, the press, the Geneva based press can help you if you provide us the right information because it would be much easier for us to help you if you give us the right elements in order for us to cover the great and very preoccupying the Christ that is affecting not only the staff everywhere in the field, but also the international Geneva and of course the refugees.
And Alessandra, maybe you could help us in organising a briefing.
Yes, Catherine well noted.
And we we can talk about our colleagues about that just as I said before, remind the be reminded that on Monday we have another agency which comes and speaks to you exactly on this subject, which is UN AIDS and the impact of the US funding cuts on the HIV response.
So this is dedicated to this issue with the focus on the situation of HIV and AIDS.
And yeah, I'm I'm looking at Matt who's nodding.
And also Matt, if you could share your your notes.
I don't hear her anymore.
So Matt, I wanted to ask, I think that the UNHCR budget has been funded.
I think it was around 46% or something by the US.
You mentioned that there had been efforts to diversify previously, but it seems, I mean that's almost half the budget that was covered by 1 donor is that could you say a little bit more about those efforts?
Has it, was it higher than that before you started?
And what, what are the sources, what are the main sources that you're, you're looking at now?
And, and also back in February, there was mention of of 6600 people jobs that would be lost.
I think that was in the reset resettlement programme maybe are those when, when there's talk about a substantial reduction in the size of the workforce, I, I assume it will be much more substantial than that.
That's not what it's referring to.
Thanks for your question, Nina.
So in the last few years, the US has contributed around 40% more or less of our entire budget.
That's a figure that has been relatively stable.
It rises, it falls depending on the specific year.
The other important donors are the EU, individual EU countries, some East Asian countries and a handful of other countries, as well as some private sector partners, some national chapters that raise money on our behalf and increasingly individual donors as well.
And so we really are looking across the board at all of those actors, especially individual donors, private sector, but also countries, existing donors and maybe new donors and foundations who can can step up and help us to continue to do this absolutely essential work, which is saving lives across the world everyday.
And it's not only about immediate humanitarian life saving.
In recent years we've been doing a lot more work on the development side, on the livelihood side to try to make sure that people are safe and stable where they are and so that they don't embark on dangerous journeys that put their lives at risk and that are incredibly difficult to manage across the world.
To your second question, we so far we are in the process of very tragically reducing jobs.
400 at the moment are being cut.
Initially we had said 600, but we had managed to reposition 200 colleagues into different roles.
But looking ahead, yes, more jobs will be cut.
As I said at the start, we, we can't give you a specific figure on that, but we think it will be a significant number.
I'll go back to Catherine because we couldn't hear her anymore, but apparently she had another point.
You had a second point, right?
Also, if you could share any written elements given by the **** Commissioner Philippo Grandi regarding the situation, that would be very helpful.
And now I'm turning regarding the situation in the our Congo.
In the notes that we received and in what you said, you spoke about the awful situation of the Congolese who are fleeing Bukavu and Goma.
But I I would underline the fact that those two capitals of North and South Kivu have been occupied by M23 rebels and according UN reports it those rebels are supported by nearby Rwanda.
I'd like to know if your agency is in contact with the authorities who are occupying those cities.
Who wants to start Eugene?
Thank you, Catherine, for your question.
We agree that this crisis has to be resolved by the political will and then political discussion.
We are seeing that the discussion has started which hasn't resulted in a meaningful ceasefire on the ground because we are seeing a still the intensified fighting further in North Kivu moving to a bit of a W at the moment and also around around the South Kivu.
So I absolutely agree that political willingness of a wearing party has to be involved and then resolve this crisis.
But we are on the ground to support the people in need.
As you mentioned that the suffering of the people of Congo, they are Congo in eastern part of the Congo is human.
It's it's in imaginable at the moment what we are hearing on the ground.
But we are in contact with the local authority and the authority in those region and then to get the access.
And then I think a both wearing party, what we are having the message from them is that reaching out to those people in need has to to be done.
So we are getting more and more access to those people in need and that we really hope that the funding will come to support and reach those people in need in the in DRC.
Katrina, yes, thank you so much for your answer.
But my, my question is, was more related on a very, I would say, basic ground situation, because we know that President Shisekedi from the our Congo and President Kagame from Rwanda did meet in Doha, Qatar, with the moderation of the Emir of Qatar.
But I'd like to know with whom do you speak on an everyday base in Goma, in Bukavi, Bukavu, who, which kind of authority?
Because we know that the local authorities had to flee, as I mentioned several times on this podium, that the, the, the situation in Eastern Congo is not just the one party that involved in this situation and contribute to the crisis at the moment.
So wherever we have a contact with the, with the authority who is controlling the area, we are in contact.
And then as I mentioned that in order to those effort that we're getting more and more access to, to people who fled the North and South Kivu.
I'll go back now to the room, Olivia and then Gabrielle.
And there will be the last question, this very, very long briefing, then we'll go to WHO.
Thank you so much for sticking around for this.
I just wanted to clarify, if I may, just on the the Europe side of these cards, you said 16 of the 80 grants grant agreements will be prioritised.
Do any of those grants affect Ukrainian refugees in Europe?
Let me get back to you on the specifics.
I think it's highly likely that they do, but I can just confirm that and get back to you.
But I think overall, in terms of Ukraine, you'll probably be aware that the humanitarian response plan, which is much broader than just UNHCR, is only 15% funded, which is 400 million out of over 2 billion.
And if that's the situation stays as it is, of course, that will hamper our ability and that of all of our partners to provide for the immediate needs of hundreds of thousands of people inside Ukraine, including those who have been evacuated recently from the front lines.
Alessandra, do you hear me?
So, yeah, it, it was very good and highly appreciated to have that press conference about the danger that the United Nations programmes are due to the US cuts.
We also want to know which countries are not donating more if and maybe they can do so.
And there are countries that do not cover their quotas.
I mean they they are very late in their payments.
So it will be very nice to know the the names of the countries.
I'm sorry, maybe you want to start.
Thanks for your point, Gabrielle as well noted.
I think we will try to arrange a briefing if we can.
I don't don't have now names of countries that are that are under, under funding, but I think we can probably give perhaps with other partners a more detailed briefing.
We'll look into it for sure.
Thank you, Gabriel, and thanks and thanks, Matt and Eugene for this briefing.
We really needed to, to hear more about the situation and we'll do our best really to to try and, and give you more information on that.
We still have one speaker and it's Tarek who has a very short announcement for those who have come up to now.
And maybe WHO also would be talking about that, I don't know.
It has been interesting but very long briefing.
So just to let to let the reporters know that United Nations Interagency Group for Child Mortality Estimation will release 2 new reports next Tuesday, March 25th.
Those two reports are Levels and trends in child mortality and counting every steel bird.
These reports, which contain important global data sets, outline how sustained investments fuelled worldwide progress in reducing child deaths and stillbirths.
However, many children are still being lost to preventable causes and decades of progress are now at risk as major donors cut of development assistance budgets.
Now these reports will be available under embargo, so please watch out for our weekly week ahead that we sent every Friday.
So in when we send it this afternoon, there will be an information how to receive those two reports under embargo.
Embargo will lift on Monday night, so Tuesday early early morning.
Also, these reports are preceding a big maternal mortality estimates for covering from 2 thousand 2023, which will be published on a World Health Day on April 7th.
And and as you may have heard that the theme of this year, World Health Day is maternal and newborn newborn health.
So look forward-looking forward to get interested reporters to get reporters reports under under embargo back to you.
Thank you very much, Tarek.
Unfortunately, we completely lost your image, but we heard everything you said.
So thank you very much for this announcement.
There was a problem with the with the image.
I don't know exactly what, but but thanks for for this information about the embargoed report.
Let me conclude this very, very long briefing with a few announcements.
Let's start with the committee's Human rights Committee.
There is the Committee on the Rights of Person with Disability, which concludes it's 30 second session this afternoon, while on Monday we will open the Committee on Enforced Disappearances.
It's not the beginning, but it's the next public meeting of the committee and that will be on the 24th of March with a report submitted by Belgium and then they will start the report of Malta.
Number of International Days.
Today we have the very important International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination.
I think we have sent you this statement of the Secretary General.
Just wanted to tell you that there is also a big event in New York because the President of the General Assembly has convened the plenary meeting of the General Assembly today to commemorate this International Day theme.
This year is 60th anniversary of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.
And you have more on the website where the event will be webcast.
It's also International Day of New rules.
We've sent you the statement of the Secretary General.
We happy to share our wishes for those who celebrate this International Day.
We have a series of international days on climate, energy and the planet, including International Day of Forest, but also the Wall Day for glaciers and World Water Day, which is coming up.
And I don't know if you saw it, but if you haven't, please read the important your news story that we've published on the occasion of this important event.
It's, it's a, I'm trying to find the information.
I think it's, it's, it's, it's pretty important that we have this International Day, especially because there will be the publication of a report that will tell us sadly that the situation of glaciers is dramatic.
And on the 23rd of March, we will speak again about climate with World Meteorological Day.
Today is also World Down syndrome Day.
And for those of you who have, you know, 20 minutes for lunch and then we'll move to the commemoration of this World Day, I would like to remind you that we have an important event going on at the UN.
The ******* point, in fact, so you can catch your you can get a sandwich and then participated in the celebration that we are organising in collaboration with the Down syndrome International and the Association of Ramond Theresa MI Vantia be speeches, live performances, a photo booth.
Please bring your socks of different colours as as we always do on this day.
And then AT2O clock, there will be a discussion which will take place during the afternoon session of the Committee on the Rights of Person with Disabilities.
And we'll focus on ways to improve support system for individuals with Down syndrome and their families.
There's also an exhibition at the Portai de Preni.
I don't know if you saw it, my story, it's called extremely nice and giving visibility to people with this syndrome, as it has to be.
I think this is all I had for you, which is quite a lot already.
And thank you very much for following this very, very long briefing.
Thank you very much for following us.