UN Geneva Press Briefing - 26 April 2024
/
1:03:10
/
MP4
/
4 GB

Press Conferences

UN Geneva Press Briefing - 26 April 2024

UN GENEVA PRESS BRIEFING

26 April 2024

 

Rolando Gómez of the United Nations Information Service (UNIS), chaired the hybrid briefing, attended by the spokespersons and representatives of the United Nations Mine Action Service, the Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining, the International Federation of the Red Cross, the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the World Health Organization.

 

27th International Meeting of Mine Action National Directors and United Nations Advisers

 

Christelle Loupforest, Officer in Charge of the Geneva Office for the United Nations Mine Action Service (UNMAS), said the 27th International Meeting of Mine Action National Directors and UN Advisors was taking place in Geneva next week. The meeting would be held on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday at the International Conference Centre Geneva. It was being organised with the Geneva International Conference Centre for Humanitarian Demining, with the support of the Swiss Government. 800 mine action leaders would gather from all around the world, along with non-governmental organisations, representatives from the private sector and United Nations advisors and humanitarian organisations. Journalists were welcome to attend the opening and closing ceremonies. The opening ceremony began on Monday April 29, from 9:30 am until 10:30 am, and the closing ceremony was on Wednesday May 1, from 4:15 pm until 4:45 pm. Interviews could be facilitated with mine action programme managers who were attending the conference from around the world. Lee Woodyear and Laura Collier of UNMAS and could arrange interviews.

 

Stefano Toscano, Director of the Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining, emphasised the excellent cooperation with UNMAS in organising the meeting. In a world where conflicts were on the rise, mine action was a necessary response. Today, 60 million people were affected by the threat of land mines, ammunition, and explosive devices every day. This danger persisted for decades after conflicts and showed that mine action transcended what was typically considered a humanitarian task. Land mines and other explosive ordinances were a barrier to human rights and development. The National Director meeting was the largest gathering in the sector and was a technical event. It was hoped that participants would leave the meetings with ideas on how to address the practical challenges on mine action. The theme this year was “Protecting life and building peace,” with sessions covering topics including the role of mine action in food security, among others.

 

Responding to questions, Mr. Gómez said with a UNOG pass, additional credentials were not required to enter the Conference Centre. Lee Woodyear had more information on this and could answer other questions.

 

Responding to questions, Pehr Lodhammar, Chief of Mine Action Programme, for UNMAS, said it was impossible to relay specific numbers of landmines and unexploded ordnance in Gaza. There was a failure rate of 10 per cent of land service ammunition; ammunition which was being fired but failed to function. It was estimated that there were 37 million tonnes of debris, amounting to 300 kilos per sqm of surface. 65 per cent of buildings destroyed were residential buildings. A workshop had been held two weeks ago in Amman, looking at explosive management, focusing on Gaza. Mr. Lodhammar said the situation in Gaza was extremely complicated. UNMAS had worked in Gaza for several years and were familiar with the types of ammunition. With 100 trucks it was estimated it would take 14 years to remove all the debris.

 

Responding to questions, Mr. Toscano said he had been in Kyiv last week. It was important to stress that the figure of 174,000 sqm being contaminated was a starting point. The hard point was determining which surfaces were contaminated. For example, in recent months, Ukrainian authorities had been able to release 18,000 sqm back to productive use.

 

Responding to further questions, Ms. Loupforest said programmes were operating in Ethiopia, Burkina Faso, Mali, Somalia, and Yemen, among others. These were crisis which were exacerbated by the use of explosive ordinances by non-State groups. The international media often forgot these stories despite the deaths which occurred and UNMAS was therefore appealing to the media to put a spotlight on these conflicts, to help these countries overcome their landmine challenges, and to help fund UNMAS in that regard.

 

Mr. Toscano said some countries had been working towards getting rid of all anti-personnel mines and cluster ammunition. Zimbabwe, Lebanon, and Sri Lanka were three countries who would be able to totally eliminate this problem with a bit of support.

 

Ms. Loupforest said 300 million was needed to replenish its voluntary trust fund. The conference was not a pledging conference but would be a technical meeting to share best practice and strengthen partnerships. However, along the margins, there would be a meeting with the Mine Action Support group, a group of 30 donors, to present the dire situation of the voluntary trust fund. Some crises were well funded, but others were forgotten, and this needed to be addressed. There also needed to be investors from the private sector.

 

Responding to further questions, Ms. Loupforest said it was difficult to determine the “top three crisis situations”. Syria was clearly a country which should be on top of the list, due to the huge number of casualties. Yemen also had a huge number of casualties. The third was West Africa and the Sahel, including Ethiopia, Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger.

 

Mr. Toscano said the most contaminated countries were those with more than 100,000 sqm of contaminated land including Afghanistan and Ukraine. It was difficult to pick one country over another; for some countries money was flowing, whereas others needed more support.

 

Ms. Loupforest said UNMAS had had a programme in Sudan for many years which had been incredibly successful; it was therefore very distressing to see a whole new contamination in Sudan, many of which were now in urban areas, where risk education had never been conducted. This week, there was an important conference being held in Oslo, to implement the political declaration on preventing the use of explosive weapons in populated areas. In Sudan, parties to the conflict were using explosive weapons in populated areas, which had devastating consequences.

 

Responding to a question, Mr. Gómez said the Director’s Meeting would not be available on zoom, and therefore in person participation was encouraged.

 

Mr. Lodhammar said UNMAS was supporting humanitarian convoys in Gaza ensuring they were safe. So far, they had supported 97 convoys. They were also assessing critical infrastructure from an explosive management perspective, conducting explosive management awareness for humanitarian agencies, and working closely with the Humanitarian Coordinator, planning for what would come.  

 

Mr. Gómez said due to the high level of interest, UNIS would look into organising a separate press conference on this topic next week.

 

Current compounding humanitarian needs, the impact of funding cuts and the longer-term humanitarian-development strategy in Afghanistan

 

Alexander Matheou, Regional Director, Asia Pacific Region for the International Federation of the Red Cross (IFRC), speaking from Doha, said he had concluded his fifth visit to Afghanistan since 2021, each time meeting with the leadership of the Afghan Red Crescent, ministers from the authorities, Afghan colleagues and communities, and visiting disaster zones, and service facilities. Over the last week, he was in Kandahar and Kabul, visiting the transit stations for returnees from Pakistan and health and mental health facilities. His visit culminated this week in Doha, with a round table event with the Afghan Red Crescent and the diplomatic community, and a partnership meeting on Sunday in support of the Afghan Red Crescent.

 

First, it was important to note some of the positive developments. While there were still plenty of security instances going on in Afghanistan, security was better than it had been for decades, and on the surface it was peaceful. There was a clear commitment to reduce theft and corruption and an openness to work with international stakeholders to support Afghanistan. However, if one peeled back a layer the severity of the humanitarian crisis became apparent. Over half a million returnees had crossed the border in recent months, with more expected in coming months. The humanitarian efforts had largely concentrated in transit centres. But the real challenges started when people moved away from those centres. Clinics in the city had reported a spike in malnutrition, and children were wasting and stunting. Interviewing the returnees themselves, most had no idea how they would settle in their point of destination and build a livelihood with nothing.

 

Mr. Matheou had two recommendations; to focus not on just the transit centres, but to also boost the capacity of health centres in areas where people were arriving. Secondly it was important to work with the Government of Pakistan in 2024, to stagger refugee returns in more manageable numbers. While hunger was an important issue, there was an invisible crisis of hopelessness, depression, and desperation, which was aggravated by decades of conflict. Mr. Matheou had seen two yards full of men, former prisoners of war, who were traumatised due to the violence they had witnessed and were unable to cope. The doctors in the facilities were doing heroic work, but it was a reminder of the pain behind the bustling cities. It was vital to support Afghan institutions working with the most vulnerable people. It was important to think long term and focus on economic regeneration. Short-term aid had a place, but it was the wrong tool to deal with chronic poverty. A shift needed to happen towards job creation. It was important not to forget Afghanistan; it was off the headlines and funding was low, but the needs were as great as ever.

 

Responding to questions, Mr. Matheou said there it was true that there was mass exclusion. During his visit he had spoken to many women, and women were employed for all IFRC health services. It was not true to say there was no participation in humanitarian services, or in the workforce of women. The safer security situation was welcomed by all. However, this did not mean that there were not other things causing the terrible mental health crisis, including women and girls’ exclusion from public life.

 

The IFRC did not have a large team; there were staff in two to three of the provinces of Afghanistan. A team of around 40 were in Kabul. Work was done through the Afghan Red Crescent. Countries needed to take responsibility for managing their own crisis and needed strong institutions to do this. It was inadequate to continue to deliver food or cash to populations who needed to resume their livelihoods and become independent. This placed more pressure to use a reduced amount of financing for longer term impact. It was possible to get funding into the country, but smaller organisations were still struggling. The future looked extremely bleak. Some things had improved, including people feeling safer. But the future, in terms of where the future female doctors, teachers and nurses would come from, and where employment would be generated for families, was looking grim. It was important to reflect on the last three years, to determine which kind of investment would be best for the people of Afghanistan.

 

Iran: Crackdown on hijab law

 

Jeremy Laurence, for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), said the Office had received information that uniformed and plainclothes police in Iran were enforcing a violent crackdown throughout the country against women and girls under the country’s strict hijab laws, as well as the men supporting them. On 21 April, the Tehran head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps announced the creation of a new body to enforce existing mandatory hijab laws. The Office was also concerned that a draft bill on "Supporting the Family by Promoting the Culture of Chastity and Hijab" was nearing final approval by the Guardian Council. While the latest draft of the bill had not been made public, an earlier version stipulated that those found guilty of violating the mandatory dress code could face up to 10 years’ imprisonment, flogging, and fines. The bill must be shelved. The UN High Commissioner called on the Iranian Government to eliminate all forms of gender-based discrimination and violence.

 

This week, the Office had also received reports that the Isfahan Revolution Court sentenced to death rapper, Toomaj Salehi, for “corruption on earth”, over views he expressed in the context of nationwide protests in 2022 following the death of Jina Mahsa Amini. The High Commissioner urged the authorities to overturn this sentence and called for his immediate and unconditional release. All individuals imprisoned for exercising their freedom of opinion and expression needed to be released. Nine men had already been executed in connection with the 2022 protests. The High Commissioner urged the Iranian Government to immediately halt the application of the death penalty and establish a moratorium on its use.

 

A full summary is available here.

 

Responding to questions, Mr. Laurence said OHCHR continued to engage with the Iranian authorities, particularly when it came to the issue of the hijab bill and the death penalty. Protests did not appear to still be taking place. In the past months, authorities were increasingly enforcing the hijab bill. The law had been in place since the 1979 revolution, but the Office was concerned at the new form of the bill, which would increase the prison term to 10 years, when it had previously been two months, along with fines and incredible floggings. There was an instance in January where a woman was flogged 74 times under this current legislation. There was only one answer; the bill had to be shelved.

 

The case of Toomaj Salehi dated back to October 2022, for public statements made in support of the nationwide protest. Subsequently he had been sentenced to death, which was then overruled by the Supreme Court. Now the Revolutionary Court was reimposing the death sentence. There would be an appeal over the next 20 days and hopefully common sense would prevail. There was not a lot more information on the new organization being established. The morality police were already in existence, and they were back out on the streets enforcing the hijab law. The Office would be monitoring the situation closely.

 

Sudan: El Fasher situation

 

Seif Magango, for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), said the UN High Commissioner was gravely concerned by the escalating violence in and around El-Fasher city, North Darfur, where dozens of people had been killed in the past two weeks as hostilities between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) had intensified. Reports indicated that both parties had launched indiscriminate attacks using explosive weapons in residential districts. At least 43 people, among them women and children, were killed as fighting was taking place between the SAF and RSF since 14 April, when the RSF began its push into El-Fasher.

 

Since early April, the RSF had conducted several large-scale attacks on the villages in western El-Fasher and had burned down some of the villages, including Durma, Umoshosh, Sarafaya, and Ozbani. Such attacks raised the spectre of further ethnically motivated violence in Darfur, including mass killings. The High Commissioner called for an immediate de-escalation of the catastrophic situation, and an end to the conflict. He also urged both parties to the conflict to grant civilians safe passage to other areas, ensure the protection of civilians, and facilitate safe and unhindered humanitarian access.

 

A full summary is available here.

 

Responding to questions, Mr. Magango said the situation was very bleak. There continued to be significant human rights violations and abuses taking place across the country. OHCHR were calling on efforts to be ramped up and for both parties to engage meaningfully in the conflict politically. One year of fighting had only led to suffering and devastating the countries politics. At the end of the day this could only be comprehensively resolved with the end of the fighting and a return to a civilian government in Sudan.

 

Widespread overuse of antibiotics during COVID-19

 

Margaret Harris, for the World Health Organization (WHO), responding to questions relating to the widespread overuse of antibiotics during the COVID-19 pandemic, said the information in the WHO press release came from the database of several materials collected in hospitals. There was a variation in overuse across the Afro, Euro, and Western-Pacific regions. Antibiotics were not being used appropriately. Overuse of antibiotics increased the likelihood of antimicrobial resistance, so when they were needed for a bacterial infection, they were not useful. If someone was given medication they did not need, they were being exposed to an unnecessary risk. Antibiotics had not been recommended as a treatment option during the pandemic. 

 

Responding to further questions, Ms. Harris said conversations around the Pandemic Treaty were expected to resume on Monday morning and would go all day. The aim was to have it ready for the world Health Assembly at the end of May.

 

Announcements


Rolando Gómez of the United Nations Information Service (UNIS), said the Committee Against Torture would review the report of North Macedonia on Wednesday morning, May 1. The CERD would close its 112th session this afternoon after having reviewed Mexico, San Marino, Albania, Qatar, and Moldova.

 

Two press conferences would be held on Tuesday the 30th of April. One at 12 pm with UNRWA’s Commissioner General, Philippe Lazzarini, who would brief on the situation in the Occupied Palestinian territory, and later at 4pm, Bruno Lemarquis, UN Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator, would speak on the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

 

***

 

The webcast for this briefing is available here: https://bit.ly/unog26042024

The audio for this briefing is available here: https://bit.ly/UNOG26042024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Teleprompter
very good morning.
Thank you for joining us for this press briefing
here at the UN office at Geneva today,
the 26th of April.
We have quite a packed agenda.
We have colleagues from human rights speaking about Iran and Sudan.
We have a colleague from the International Federation of the Red
Cross who is going to address Afghanistan and then on the podium
on my right, we have Mr Stefano Toscano, who is the director of the
Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian de Mining,
and Miss Christa Loup
Pore.
Uh, who is the,
uh, U unmasked UN Mine Action service. Uh
uh head of the UN Mine Action Service here in Geneva.
They're gonna speak about the 27th International Meeting
of Mine Action National directors in the UN,
the UN Advisors,
the otherwise known as NDM UN 27 which is actually taking place next week here
in Geneva. So over to you for brief remarks and then for questions afterwards.
There you
go.
Ok,
Hi. Good morning, everyone.
It's my pleasure to announce that we have
the 27th international meeting of the mine action
National directors and UN Adviser taking place next week in Geneva on Monday,
Tuesday.
Wednesday it will happen at the International Conference Centre of Geneva
and this is an event that we're organising together
with the Geneva Centre for Humanity and de Mining
our
partnership here to represent this
endeavour. And we are doing this with the support of the government of Switzerland
and I take this opportunity to really thank them for enabling us to do this event.
We have about 800 mine action leaders who are
coming from all around the world to participate.
We're talking about national directors, national authorities, but also a
lot of
NGOs, private sector and of course,
all the UN advisers who are supporting national authorities and also humanitarian
organisations to deliver mine action around the world.
We would like to welcome the journalists to come
to the opening ceremony and the closing ceremony.
So the opening one is on Monday from 930 to 1030
the closing ceremony is on 1st May
at 415
until 445. So again it's in the Geneva International Conference Centre.
What's really important if you have two very important
colleagues here in the room who can also facilitate
interviews with some of those mine action
programme managers coming from around the world.
So you can see here we have Lee Wooer,
who is in charge of communication for
Mass,
and Laura Collier,
who is communications director for the
GD.
So please reach out to them. We have 30 people to give you an idea.
You know, the chief of our
mine action programme in Afghanistan will be here.
The
adviser to the resident to the new main co ordinator
in Ukraine, Adviser on mine action will be here.
So it's a good opportunity if you want to discover a
little bit more about mine action in some of those crises.
Yes, and I will just pass the floor to Steffan
to
introduce a little bit more about the substance of the meeting.
Good morning,
monsieur.
First of all, let me start by
thanking
and emphasising the excellent Cooper operation we have with en
mas
in organising this meeting.
It's really a privilege to work with you.
And I also would like to acknowledge,
as Cristel already did the pressure support
by Switzerland to make the meeting possible.
So
in a world where conflicts we know are on the rise in number size and complexity.
My connection is a necessary response to a humanitarian imperative,
and
today still
60 million people are affected
in their daily lives
by the threat of explosive ordnance,
landmines, cluster munition and improvised explosive devices.
So 60 million people in more than 60 countries
and territories are still living with this fear every day
by simply going about their daily task.
These people
can be putting their lives and livelihood in danger,
and this is true during the conflict, but also after the conflicts and for decades.
So it's really a significant threat over the years and across the globe.
This shows that my action also transcends what we typically consider to be
to be a humanitarian task.
When a child in Yemen cannot safely walk to or a
school or a farmer in Ukraine risks missing another wet season,
it is clear that land mines and other explosive
ordnance are a major barrier to human rights,
decent work and sustainable development.
As mentioned by Cristel, we also very much look forward to welcoming
more than 800 expert participants from around the world to discuss these issues
at the 27th National Director meeting
and
really this is the largest gathering in the sector
and
it really makes a difference.
The national director meeting is a technical event. It
is a meeting of practitioners by practitioners for practitioners
and it is our wish and hope that participants will leave the
meeting with concrete ideas on how best to address their practical challenges,
their practical, everyday challenges in performing by an action.
And this is based on the exchange with others.
And this really is in a nutshell what the national director meeting is all about.
This year's theme is Protecting Life and Building peace.
The sessions will be delving into a broad
range of topics from global challenges
like the role of mine action in food security
and global supply chains to new technology
and mobilising resources to release the final square metre
of land for countries to be declared mine free.
This latter point is particularly important.
We know there is a competition for funds on many fronts
and the sector as to focus on this in order to find innovative ways to ensure
its funding.
So we welcome you as Christel
as an
MAS, very much to join us on Monday morning
at the nearby C
for the opening session and have provided a list of
experts who would be available for interviews upon request. So thank you very much.
Thanks to you both.
We do have a couple of questions for you, starting with Catherine Fiona of
Franz Vca,
who is online.
Catherine over to. Yes. Thank you.
Thank you, Rolando.
Bonjour, madame. Bonjour, monsieur. Thank you for being here.
I have a a couple of questions.
So first of all, could you be kind enough to send your press releases?
Um, and list of participants to, uh, unis,
uh, through Orlando in order for all, uh, the press to have access to
the list of, uh, participants.
I have also a question of access to the CE CG.
Will our UN badge be enough to enter?
Um, the the centre,
uh, to meet the national directors and interview them, uh, and meeting them,
Um, and also about the title of Madame Crystal. Uh, Lou Forest.
What is your exact title at un mas?
And if you could be kind enough to share with us the contact detail.
I'm sorry. The contact details of your communication officer
in Geneva
and for the notes. If we could have it as soon as possible. Thank you.
Thank you, Katherine. Of course, I'll let Christel
give you her title, but just on housekeeping.
Since many of your questions deal with housekeeping, you do not require to, uh,
credentials to access.
However, if you are interested to
Lee woo year,
we did share with you this media advisory with contact information
for both Lee and Laura both in the room here,
uh, along with a number of people, potential interviewees.
So you do not need to get additional credentials if you already have you
not bass.
Um, but, uh, do if you haven't received this, maybe either.
Check with Lee if you're in the room. Lee and Laura.
Otherwise, we can gladly just resend this to you.
And, uh, maybe for your exact title. Um, over to Crystal.
Yes, thank you very much for this question. In fact, I have two titles.
I'm the officer in charge of the
mass office in Geneva, the UN Mine Action Service office in Geneva.
But I am also the global co ordinator of the Mine Action Area of Responsibility,
which is a group of un and
NGOs that work together as part of the global protection cluster
in the humanitarian response architecture. So I have two titles
and I'm taking this opportunity of having the floor again
to let you know that today we put on the
mast website
our annual report.
So please take a look. You can see who are funding
mast and what we do with the money and
how many people
how many lives we've saved by destroying explosive items. Thank you.
Thank you very much. And yeah, do take a look at the website.
It's got a lot of interesting facts and figures there.
Uh, we have a question from Ben from RT S in the room. Front row.
Thanks.
Thank you for the event. It's well noted now about the news.
Do you have any fresh data about
any
mine contamination or explosive
remnants in Gaza? We have a lot of data on Ukraine, of course,
but
if I'm not mistaken, still absolutely nothing about Gaza.
So maybe you have some fresh news.
We ourselves are not active at this point in time,
so I wouldn't have first hand news or figures that I could share with you.
I understand
the
uns colleague might have more information on that.
If you want to
come up. And
if you would like to jump up here,
Yes. So you actually
mass has a programme in
Palestine and has had one for many years. And of course, we are in the process of
providing as much assistance as we can and redesigning the
programme to make it fit for purpose for the new situation
and
will give you more detail about that. Thanks.
Thank you very much.
So concerning the numbers it is
right now. It's impossible to say we don't know.
We know that typically there is a failure rate
of at least 10% of land service ammunition,
ammunition that is being fired and fails to function.
What we do know is that we estimate 37 million tonnes of debris
which is approximately 300 kg of debris per square metre.
65% of the buildings that have been destroyed
are residential buildings.
And
two weeks ago or the week before this week, we had together with you and the P,
a workshop
in Amman,
looking at explosive hazard management from a debris
perspective and removing explosive hazards in debris,
focusing on
gosa. We did this together with the NGO community
in order to prepare ourselves for what eventually might come
and an intervention in Gaza.
I worked myself in Iraq for the last seven years.
So I have seen this in the past, not to the same extent.
But it is a very complicated situation with potentially deep bird bombs also,
And as Chris
said, we've worked in Gaza for several years, so we are familiar with
the types of ammunition we are familiar with
with deep earth bombs but numbers I cannot give you.
Thank you. Per. And I should just mention that
in the list of potential interviewees, we have a colleague from en Mass
who is charged with looking into the situation in Palestine.
Uh, Charles Birch, in fact.
OK, Jeremy, you have a question
just to follow up.
Can you say again, how many kilos per square metres you just said?
And if you had? I know I understand that you don't have the full numbers, but
the full picture. But if you have to take a guess,
when we talk about Ukraine,
we are saying that it will take decades for Ukraine to get rid
of explosives.
If you have to take a guess about Gaza.
How many
centuries would it take?
Yes, So first of all, I wouldn't guess,
because it's impossible to guess all I can say that at least
10% of the ammunition that is being fired potentially fails to function,
and the number was 300 kg per square metre of surface with debris.
One number I can give you is that an estimation has
been done based on the current number of tonnes of debris
in Gaza and with 100 trucks.
We're talking about 14 years of work with 100 trucks, So that's
based on that figure. 14 years to remove with approximately 750,000 work days
person workday to remove the debris. So
significant numbers when it comes to debris.
Thank you very much.
Uh, per
questions in the oh, yes, Stefano wanted to add something, please.
Thank you.
If I may just add a comment on Ukraine
because there are indeed many numbers out there.
I just
have come. I was in Kyiv last week and we had
my action donor coordinations seminar.
I
think it is important to stress that, for example,
the figure of 174,000 square kilometres suspected of being contaminated
is of course a starting point and in my action the
hard work is really to move from the starting point to determining
which surface exactly is contaminated.
And just to say that in recent months
the Ukrainian authorities have been able to release
18,000 square kilometres back to productive use.
So you see that
the way mine action functions allows you
via the application of standards to clarify
relatively speedily in certain cases which surfaces can
be released to productive use and which cannot.
So this job needs to continue,
the figure will decrease. It is still very massive.
But it is the task,
the first task once conditions allow to determine with more precision
which part of the country is contaminated and which is not,
thank you very much. I would just like to follow up on the fact that
the media is very interested,
of course in the situation consequences for the population and also what we call
reverberating consequences, as per
was describing
the amount of time and energy and money and the risk of clearing explosive items in
in rubbles, you know
when you have buildings have been destroyed. It's very difficult. So
that's for Sudan.
But I think the best thing would be for the
colleague interested in Sudan to talk to our programme manager
Sadiq, who is actually a
former Afghani miner who is now the head of our programme in Sudan. Thank you.
Uh, thank you very much. And I was just getting clarification. Yes, indeed.
Sadiq Rashid is the name of the person who's dealing with Sudan.
So do reach out to him. And then in terms of Zoom, I think you had a question.
Uh, no, it will not be zoomed. Therefore, we do strongly encourage in person,
uh, participation and do, um,
again, no need to get credentials, but do register through Lee Wood year,
and we'll make sure you get his context,
OK? Really? Last two questions because we have quite a busy
agenda afterwards, John Zarak
Costas. And then we'll go to Yuri and then we'll have to wrap it there.
John, over to you?
Yes. Uh, good morning. You can hear me there.
Indeed.
Oh, good.
Uh, yes. Uh,
this is a question, uh, for the Lancet.
Uh, I was wondering if you could give us some information on how many health, uh,
facilities and, uh, ambulances, et cetera
have been, uh, damaged because of IE DS or cluster munitions.
And secondly, if I'm not mistaken, I think win mas
is involved in some of the, uh, emergency, uh, trips to some of the hospitals in Gaza.
Have you found unexploded ordinances in some of the hospitals?
And are you in the process of removing them? Thank you.
So most of those questions I'm happy to refer them to Charles our sea
for Gaza,
who will be here next week and who will be able to answer questions.
But what I can talk about
is what we've done in Gaza so far.
So we are supporting humanitarian convoys
from an explosive hazard management standpoint,
supporting them, ensuring that they are safe.
We supported 97 convoys. So far,
we are assessing critical infrastructure, looking at it from
an explosive hazard management perspective. Looking at the impact,
we are doing explosive hazard awareness for
humanitarian workers so that they are safe.
We provided risk education for civilians in Gaza to 1.2 million people.
We are looking eventually at the multi sectoral assessment to be planned.
Where we will be part and together with the rest of the humanitarian sector,
we will look at explosive weapons and their use.
And other than that,
we are working closely with the
resident coordinator and the humanitarian coordinator
in planning and preparing for what
potentially will come.
And I also mentioned the workshop last week in Amman where we were
looking at the problem with debris in urban populated areas.
Thank you.
Thank you. Per
and final question from Yuri
from Rio University.
Yuri.
Yes, Thank you, Orlando. This is more a request than a question.
Can we have a separate briefing on that?
Because, as you said, there are a lot of topics today
in the briefing of the UN. But we have a lot of questions. Still for en mas.
So if we can organise something
just only on this topic with you
the next week, for example,
it would be really great because still a lot of questions.
Thank you.
Absolute.
I think, uh, gauging from the level of interest we've just felt here.
And, uh, indeed,
um, this is something we can explore with Lee and Laura afterwards.
Uh, but thanks for? For registering that on that note. I'm sorry, John.
We really need to wrap it up and move to the next.
If you can contact Lee or Laura afterwards. John, I know you have your hand up.
Um, So thank you, uh, for joining us here very much. Good luck.
Next few days and thanks to you for
really shedding light on this very important issue.
So on that note, we will move to we're gonna shift the order a little bit, I think, uh,
Tomaso, we have a colleague, Uh, who's gonna speak on Afrikaans?
Did you wanna come up here? And I can introduce him if you like. Sure.
OK, so we're gonna move to thank you very much once again.
So we're gonna move to, um, Afghanistan.
We have a colleague from the International Federation for the Red Cross.
Uh, Mr Alexander Mat,
who is a regional director for the IFRC.
Who is joining us from Adoha. Who's going to speak to the, uh,
a long term and human development strategy in Afghanistan.
Alexandre, over to you.
Thank you very much. Good morning, everybody.
I've just concluded my fifth visit to Afghanistan since the autumn of 2021 each
time through a combination of meeting the leadership of the Afghan Red Crescent,
the ministers from the IE a authorities meeting Afghan colleagues,
Afghan communities visiting disaster zones and service facilities.
I tried to understand how humanitarian trends are evolving
and what may be the best way to address them.
Over the last week, uh, I was in Kandahar and Kabul.
I met the acting minister of foreign affairs,
the acting deputy prime minister, Abdul
Kabir,
the governor of Kandahar,
and I visited the transit stations, the Spin
Boldak transit station for returnees from Pakistan,
health facilities in Kandahar city and in the
surrounding villages and mental health facilities in Kandahar.
And my visit culminates this week in Doha
in a round table event,
together with the Afghan Red Crescent and the
CRC, with the diplomatic community here in Doha who cover Afghanistan
and then a partnership meeting on Sunday in support of the Afghan Red Crescent.
And I would like to just quickly share
some highlights and recommendations from my visit.
But I will start by saying it is important to note some of the positives
because while there are still
plenty of security incidents going on in Afghanistan every day, actually,
or most day most days.
The security on the whole is better than it has been for decades,
and on the surface it is peaceful
and this is clearly
deeply welcomed by a war ravaged population.
There is also a clear commitment to reduce
theft and corruption that is also welcomed,
and mostly an openness to work with international stakeholders
who want to work in and support Afghanistan.
So those are some positives. Peel back a layer, though,
and the severity of the humanitarian crisis does become very apparent.
And I'm just going to raise two issues that came
from my visit here and then make a few recommendations
first on the returnees from Pakistan.
Uh,
you will be aware that over half a million have crossed the border over recent months
and it is likely that we will see
large numbers of new arrivals in the coming months.
And I imagine this is probably the largest population flow in a short period of time
in Asia since the population movement from Myanmar into Bangladesh
in 2017. So it's a significant event.
The humanitarian effort has largely concentrated on
the transit stations in the border areas
to help people on arrival
at these transit points.
But
the evidence that we looked at on this visit suggests that
the real challenges start once people move away from those transit areas.
And the evidence of that was we We visited clinics where
they reported a real spike in cases of acute malnutrition.
Coming from the arrivals from Pakistan,
we visited Immun
routine immunisation programmes of the IC IFRC and
the Afghan Red Crescent in the villages.
And there it was clear looking at the Children that,
uh as well as being anaemic you could steal. You could see wasting and stunting
uh uh amongst the Children.
And when we And when we interviewed the returnees themselves,
it was also clear that
most had no idea
how they were going to settle in their point of destination
or how they were going to build a livelihood
with nothing.
And largely they expected to be living with distant relatives,
which
would actually make very,
very poor people some of the most poorest communities in the world,
even poorer.
So I'd like to make just two suggestions on this.
What will be an ongoing response through about
2024 1 that the programmes to support returnees
focus not just on the transit stations which have
received the bulk of the investment to date.
But they also look at boosting the capacity of the health services
in the areas where people are arriving
and
that there be a focus on economic regeneration of the people once they arrive.
Secondly, it will be important to work with the government of Pakistan in 2024
to, uh to ask that that if there are going to be returnees, that they at least come in,
uh in a more staggered way in smaller numbers at a time. Just so it's more manageable
on the Afghan side.
The second
issue that I want to raise in terms of crisis is
about the mental health crisis in the country,
because a lot is said about hunger, education,
exclusion and disasters in Afghanistan, and rightly so
because all of those issues are important and all of them, one way or another,
IFRC is involved in responding to. But beneath those crises
there is an invisible crisis of hopelessness, depression,
desperation that stem from a collapsing health service, mass unemployment,
barriers to education
and frustrated boys, girls, men and women who are stuck at home all day.
All of which is aggravated by decades of conflict trauma
And as well as hearing that in every conversation that I had,
I did have the chance to witness that in its most extreme form,
uh, a place where you see
the real terrible collateral damage of war
in the mental health services of the Afghan Red Crescent.
And here I saw sort of yards full of men,
former prisoners of war people traumatised by violence, bombs, torture,
who had witnessed the death of their loved ones
in
in a terrible state and no longer able to cope or be independent in life.
And the women and girls also victims
of violence exposed to bombings and and tragedies
living in cells
with no exposure to the outside world and not even with blankets to sleep on.
Now, the doctors, um uh, in the facilities, both male and female,
are doing heroic work to try to make it
functional and dignified behind, despite the constraints.
But it was a reminder that
how much pain there is behind the high walls in what are now quite bustling
cities.
So in terms of recommendations, I would say that that the first is how important it is
to support Afghan institutions who are working with the most vulnerable people.
And there are still lots of reservations about this.
But it is really the only way to sustainably help
the country rather than constantly
relying on parallel international organisations.
In IFRC, that means supporting the Afghan Red Crescent.
But there are plenty of other,
uh, clinics and institutions who are desperately in need of support.
The second point is really how important it is now to
be thinking long term and to focus on economic regeneration,
not just for returnees.
A huge amount of the international financing to date has focused on short term aid,
including ours, actually,
which has a place. But it is
the wrong tool to deal with protracted
and chronic poverty, and a shift really needs to happen
towards job creation.
Having said that, the third point is that Afghanistan is clearly highly prone
to disasters.
Uh,
we saw the earthquake a few months ago were responding to floods in
the south of the country as we speak these disasters are constantly making
poor people destitute.
And in those cases we do need to step in with emergency aid as well. As physicians work
for that. With so many restrictions on education in the country,
we need to find every opportunity we can to invest in youth
youth groups, learning opportunities, training opportunities,
vocational opportunities for men and women.
Anything that helps people feel dignified
gives them a chance to learn
and to be positive,
which aid handouts
tend not to do.
And I think finally, the most important thing is you know,
not to forget Afghanistan.
It's off the headlines.
The funding is low,
but the needs are as great as ever.
And it's no less important than it was
when it was in the headlines before.
Thank you.
Thanks to you. Very important message indeed.
Christian from a German news agency. It's a question for you. Go ahead, Christian.
Uh, thank you very much,
Alexandra.
I was, uh, uh stopped. I stopped at the first, uh uh,
things you mentioned. How it's so welcome that the security,
uh, situation has become better. Did you speak to women?
Whether they are also welcoming the situation, uh, being being
hid away and stuck in their homes. And maybe you can say a few words on
on this dilemma. How do you deliver
any help That, uh, targets women and girls?
Uh, how much are you restricted or how can you get around
the restrictions?
It's You seem to be suggesting that it's necessary to work together with the with the
Afghan authorities. How How do you do that if they, uh,
treat half the population with disdain?
Thank you.
Well, thank you for the question. I don't want to sugar coat it. There are
massive exclusion,
uh,
challenges. And there is massive exclusion.
I did speak to women, of course. More women than men. Actually,
uh, we are very proactively trying to ensure that our workforce is gender balanced.
Uh, we, uh, employ women for all of our health services. Mental health services.
Um, primary health clinic services
services for women headed households. Widow headed households are run by women.
So actually, I spoke to a lot of women.
and we have women and Afghan women here at the round
table this week to speak about their experiences as well.
So I don't want to, you know, in any way. Uh
um, you know, not emphasise how important that issue is,
but it would not be true to say that
there is no participation in humanitarian services or
no participation in the workforce or no participation in
being clients of services because actually women are
both delivering the assistance and receiving the assistance through
the IFRC and the Afghan. At present,
the security, I think, is welcomed by all. Yes, I had a special.
I spoke to women individually,
and I had a special session just for women to discuss what's going on in their lives,
not just the IFRC.
Generally,
I think nobody wants to be in an insecure environment or to feel
unsafe when they go to the shops or go to the market.
So there is
a genuine sense that the security is better
and people are no longer constantly living in fear
of being collateral damage or a target to the bombing attacks.
Uh,
but that doesn't mean there are not other things in life that
are causing that terrible mental health crisis that I refer to,
of which being excluded from many work opportunities and
education opportunities for girls is clearly a key one.
Thank you very much. We have a question now from Paula of Geneva Solutions. Paula?
Yes. Uh, hi.
Um so, first of all, I'd like to know, um, how many people you actually have deployed
in Afghanistan?
Um, where they're deployed are are they deployed beyond, uh, urban areas.
And also, I guess, um you know, same question for the red,
uh, Red crescent. Um, there.
And, uh,
beyond that, I think I have lots of questions. I.
I think I probably have have to speak to you directly, but, um,
also in terms of, you know, you're talking about the need for more, um,
development type aid.
I know that.
You know, there's sort of a certain type of repackaging of,
um of some of the aid in ter in, In other terms that are used,
um, that is taking place.
And, uh, just wondering, you know, if that's already started within,
um, the, uh uh, IFRC And, you know, red Crescent movements. Uh, there. And,
uh, what specifically that, uh, would involve.
So it's your first point.
We don't have a large team,
but we nev we almost never do because our
model of working is to work through a national organisation
and only keep the minimum minimum capacity on the international side
That's necessary for representation, technical support and quality, uh,
quality assurance and accountability.
So our our team is
we have staff, um,
in two or three of the provinces of Afghanistan.
But the team of around 40 of which are, uh, six or seven are expatriates
are in Kabul,
and the work is done through the
national organisation through the Afghan Red Crescent.
And that is our model for all its opportunities and risks.
Uh, it is our fundamental belief that the country has to take its respon
responsibility for managing its own crises.
And it needs strong institutions to do that.
And we try to support one of them through the Red Cross and Red Crescent Society.
In every country in the world, Afghanistan is no different.
in terms of the livelihoods,
we have actually been working on it for years.
It's just not enough, and we're not scaling it.
So one of our core programmes, for example, is the widow headed households that are,
um
and this is a huge problem in Afghanistan,
especially because of the restrictions in some of the workplaces
that widow headed. Households then become destitute very quickly.
Uh, so we have centres where they can both stay
and where they can get vocational skills
and seek to become economically independent.
After one or two years of being supported in in these centres,
they're just not big enough to go to scale.
You know, we had 500 graduates last year, for example, which is a drop in the ocean.
Other agencies, I think, are largely aligned with the idea that
it is inadequate to continue Contin,
continually deliver food or cash
to populations who
ultimately need to restore their
livelihoods and become economically independent.
And if that were not self evident, it becomes
enforced in the sense that now the funding ceilings have gone down so much,
the amount of people that can be reached
through aid distributions is diminishing every single year.
So that places I think,
even more pressure to use the reduced amount of financing for longer term impact.
Thanks very much. We have one more question from Nick of the New York Times.
Nick.
Yeah, Thank you. Um, I there was a very active
Afghan civil society pre 2021.
I'm just wondering to what extent Um international sanctions continue to inhibit
support to um national organisations
International organisations have international connections
But Afghan national societies um are they
Is there any funding actually reaching them?
Thank you.
Uh it is possible to get funding into the country.
Um and but there are restrictions on it and you have to get sanctions,
exemptions and so forth.
So we are We are getting
funding into the country.
I hear that there are many smaller NGO S that are still struggling
not just because of the practical limitations of accessing financing,
but generally interest in the context has gone down.
And I think that's what you know, you know, that is that is the critical issue that
the future is looking extremely bleak.
I I mentioned a few points about the positives because I think it's only fair,
only fair to do so.
Some things
are
improvements generally for people's life the fact that people feel safer for, uh,
for example,
that's no small thing in a country that's been so traumatised by wars
but the future in terms of
where will the next generation of female doctors and nurses come from?
Where Will the next generation of female teachers come from,
Uh, where is going to be?
The investment come from where that will
generate the employment opportunities for FA,
for families to be, uh, economically independent and hopeful about the future.
Rather than
desperate to leave, uh, or desperately depressed
these these future projections are looking quite
grim,
Which is why it is so important, I think,
for a rethink about what type of investment is going to have the best impact.
What type of investment is what have we learned from the last three years?
Where do we think this is going?
And what type of investment is likely to
be best primarily for the people of Afghanistan,
which is controversial because there is so much
politics involved in decisions around allocations of aid.
But in the interests of the people of Afghanistan,
it's important to have this discussion and try to find the best solution possible.
Thank you very much, Alexander. I think that's the end of the questions.
But Tom also wanted to add something.
Yeah. Thank you. Thank you, Orlando.
And of course, thank you, Alexander, for this, uh,
uh, comprehensive briefing.
Not just because I'm saying I'm seeing some questions and, uh,
journals that are interested in, uh,
we will have Alexander Indo
together with our head of delegation in Afghanistan available for
interviews in the next coming days during the partnership meeting,
but also in the next weeks to come.
So if you want to follow up,
if you have any follow up questions if you want to talk to them,
please feel free to contact us to the usual channel of the
media team. Thank you very much.
Thank you very much. And thanks again, Alexander.
Very much for this important briefing.
And, of course, feel free to join us any time.
OK, we'll move on to Iran.
Uh,
Jeremy Lawrence from the human rights the UN Human
rights Office says update on the Iran hijab law.
Jeremy.
Thanks. Uh, Rollo and good morning, everyone.
Uh,
we have received information that uniformed and plain clothes police
in Iran are enforcing a violent crackdown throughout the country
against women and girls under the country's strict hijab laws,
as well as men who are supporting them.
There have been reports of widespread arrests and harassment of women and girls,
many between the ages of 15 and 17.
On the 21st of April, the Tehran head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
announced the creation of a new body to en
enforce existing mandatory hijab laws,
adding that guard members have been trained to do so in a more serious manner
in public spaces.
Reports indicate that hundreds of businesses have been
forcibly closed for not enforcing compulsory hijab laws,
and surveillance cameras are being used to identify
women drivers not complying with the laws.
Our office is also very concerned that a draught bill titled
Supporting the Family for Promoting the Culture of Chastity and Hijab,
which impose imposes even stricter punishments,
is nearing final approval by the Guardian Council.
While the latest draught of the bill has not been made public,
an earlier version stipulates that those found guilty of violating the
mandatory dress code could face up to 10 years imprisonment,
flogging
and fines.
Corporal punishment constitutes a form of cruel,
inhumane and degrading treatment or punishment,
and any detention
um
imposed for the exercise of fundamental
freedoms is arbitrary under international law.
We reiterate that this bill must be shelved,
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk calls on the Iranian
government to eliminate all forms of gender based discrimination and violence,
including through the revision
and the repeal of harmful laws, policies and practises
in line with international human rights norms and standards.
This week, we also received reports that the Isfahan
Revolution Court sentenced to death rapper Toma
Salehi.
He was convicted
and sentenced
for corruption on earth
over views he expressed in the context of nationwide
protests in 2022 following the death of Gina Massa
Amini
Massar
Aini had fallen into a coma in police custody
after being detained by the Morality police for not wearing
a headscarf properly.
The high commissioner urges the authorities to overturn Tama
Saleh his sentence
and calls for his immediate and unconditional release.
All individuals imprisoned for exercising their
freedom of opinion and expression,
including artistic expression, must be released.
Nine men
have already been executed
in connection
with the 2022 protests.
The high commissioner urges the Iranian
government to immediately halt the application
of the death penalty and establish a moratorium on its use.
Until then,
the death penalty may only be imposed for the most serious crimes,
which refers to crimes of extreme gravity
that result intentionally and directly in death.
Thank you very much. Uh, Jeremy
and I see that the, uh, notes have been shared with us, so thank you for that as well.
Uh, we have questions, uh, for Jeremy.
Are they in the room or online?
I see. Uh, Lisa from VO. A. Has a question for you, Lisa. Over to you.
Thanks. Uh, good morning, Jeremy.
Um, have all street protests ceased because of fear.
And, uh uh,
do you have
I
I don't know, speak of bullies. Why is it why is this such
unmitigated hostility toward women?
Do you see a anything comparable in regard to other groups in, uh,
Iranian society?
Or, uh, I mean, the revolutionary people, the Khomeini, and
so
they seem to be very
much afraid of women. Are they afraid of women? And then I'm wondering whether
the High Commissioner has received any response to as many
calls his interventions or whether he's just kind of calling into the winder
wilderness. Thank you.
Yes. Well, I certainly hope it's not into the wilderness.
Um, we continuing to engage with the Iranian authorities.
that will continue, um,
and particularly when it comes to, uh, the issue of the hijab bill and, uh,
the death penalty.
With respect to the, uh, to
the protests,
they do not appear to be taking place. Still, in the context of,
uh, the protest follow
Masar
ain's, uh, death.
but what we have seen, uh, what we're hearing
is
in the past months, uh, that
the authorities, whether they be plainclothes police or or or or pla, uh,
the policemen in uniform
are increasingly enforcing
the the hijab, Bill. Um,
uh, as you know, the hijab law has been in place since the 1979 revolution.
This is nothing new.
Uh,
what we're also doing is taking this opportunity to raise our
concern about the the new form of this hijab bill,
which, as I mentioned, is,
increasing will increase the prison term to 10 years.
It had previously been about two months,
and the same with fines, Um,
and and
incredibly floggings. Um,
in fact, we we there was an instance in in January where a woman was flogged 74 times.
Um, it it, uh,
under this, uh, current legislation.
So
it's, uh there's only one answer for this, and it's
as we say in the statement,
the the bill has to be shelved.
Thank you very much. We have, uh, Nick New York Times question.
Yeah. Thank you. Um, Jeremy, I wonder if you have any more on
the new organisation that you say is being set up.
And the second question is,
um
do you have much detail on what it was that, um,
uh,
Mr
Clay, He said that has provoked this sentence.
And whether you think his death sentence
is relating specifically to his comments on,
um, the protests or whether there are other aspects of his, um,
activities his career that might have, um,
triggered such AAA severe, Uh, response. Thank you.
Yes. Thanks, Nick. So this case actually dates back to, um
uh, he was initially imprisoned in October 2022
for,
uh, public statements that he made in support of the nationwide protest.
Uh, subsequent to that, there has been he he had been sentenced to death.
Then there had been, uh, the Supreme Court over overruled. That,
uh,
Now we've got this, uh, the Isfahan
court. The Revolution Court, Uh, reimposing the death sentence.
now what I can say from what we understand, is that,
uh, there will be an appeal. Uh uh. It'll, uh, over the next 20 days,
um, hopefully common sense will prevail on on that front.
Thank you very much. Jeremy.
Further questions for Jeremy on
that We have Nick follow up. Yep.
Jeremy, I was asking also about the new organisation that you say is being set up.
Uh, what information you have on that? Thank you,
Nick. I'm afraid we don't have a lot more information.
That was in,
the what we had heard through through the
channels coming from our sources coming from,
in inside Iran.
as you know, that there is or the existence of the morality police already.
Um, they, uh their actions seem to
they seem to pull back slightly after that. The protests.
But what we're hearing now is that they're they're back
out on the streets enforcing
the hijab law itself.
We'll be following the situation obviously very closely with
respect to this new force and this new decree,
which has been issued through the Revolutionary Guards.
Great. Thanks very much for that. Uh, Jeremy,
uh, for the questions.
No, I don't see that's the case.
So Thank you once again for highlighting this important issue. We have, uh,
on the lines.
Magogo
who? I also of the UN office, The human rights office, Who is, uh,
speaking with us from Nairobi. And thanks for your patience safe. Um, S
is going to speak about Sudan and the situation specifically in El Fasher.
Safe Over to you.
Thanks. Thanks so much. Orlando. And, uh, thanks for,
uh, everyone and, uh, yeah. Good morning.
the
the UN
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights worker Turkey is gravely concerned
by the
by the escalating violence in and around Al Fasher city, North Darfur,
where dozens of people have been killed in the past two weeks
as hostilities between the Sudan Armed Forces
and the rapid support forces have intensified.
Reports indicate that both parties have
launched indiscriminate attacks using explosive weapons
with white area effects such as mortar shells and rocket
fired rockets fired from fighter jets in residential districts.
At least 43 people among the women and
Children were killed as fighting was taking place between
the SAF and RSF, backed by their respective allied militia.
Since 14 April, when the RSF began its push into fashion.
Civilians are trapped in the city.
The only one in Darfur stood in the hands of the SAF,
afraid of being killed should they attempt to flee
this. This dire situation is compounded by a severe shortage of essential supplies
as deliveries of commercial goods and humanitarian
aid have been heavily constrained by the fighting
and delivery trucks are unable to
freely transit through RSF controlled territory.
Since early April,
the RSF has conducted several large scale attacks on villages in western al
Fasher,
mostly inhabited by the African
Zaga ethnic community.
RSF has burned down some of the villages, including DMA,
Ssh,
Sarafiya and
Uba.
Such attacks raised the spectre of other ethnically motivated violence in Darfur,
including mass killings
last year. Fighting and attacks between the Riza
and the African
Masalit in western Darfur
left hundreds of civilians dead and injured
and thousands displaced from their homes.
The commissioner calls for an immediate
de escalation of this catastrophic situation,
an end to the conflict that has published the country for more than a year now,
and investigation of all alleged violations and abuses of international
human rights law
and violations of international humanitarian law
with a view to ensuring accountability
and victims' right to
grow justice and reparations.
He also urges both parties
to the conflict and their allies to grant civilians safe passage to other areas,
ensure the protection of civilians
and civilian objects
and facilitate safe and unhindered humanitarian access.
Thank you.
Thank you. Safe
questions for safe on Sudan.
Lisa, Voice of America.
Thank you
are safe.
uh uh
uh. The outlook appears to be very bleak. I'm wondering if there is any,
Uh, what shall I say? Uh, communication pipeline, whether,
uh,
what is
happening, if anything, on the
United Nations negotiating fronts?
I mean,
there are a lot of organisations and a lot of people in your or your own included,
which are,
uh, screaming about stopping this.
And and is it even reasonable to believe that it's possible to have any kind of an
investigation
into abuses or whatever? I uh uh
I'm sorry. It it it It seems
pretty hopeless at the moment. How do you view the situation? Do you see any opening,
uh, to stop this?
Thanks.
Well, indeed. It's, uh, still a very catastrophic situation.
Uh, bleak as you describe it.
there continues to be lots of human rights
violations and abuses taking place across the country.
Not just in, uh, uh, Darfur.
Um, and, um,
the the the diplo. On the diplomatic front,
there has been bits and starts in the process.
Um, but, um, we as OHC
are,
um uh, we
we are calling indeed for
talks to be ramped up and for both parties to,
um, engage,
uh, meaningfully into the process to resolve this, uh, conflict.
Um uh, politically,
uh, because one year of fighting has only led to,
um, civilian suffering
and, uh, devastated the country's economy poli politics and everything.
So it's, uh, indeed
bleak.
Um, talks are continuing,
but of course, uh, we see that, uh uh,
there is need to ramp them up and
try to push, because at the end of the day,
peace can only be comprehensively resolved.
Uh, through the end of the fighting and a
return to civilian government in Sudan.
Thank you. Safe.
Do we have further questions
for safe on Sudan?
No, I don't see. That's the case. So, uh,
thank you very much for highlighting this and colleagues for keeping. Oh, you have
a OK, maybe another issue or
ok, We have, um, question on another issue, but so thank you very much.
Safe, Much appreciated.
Uh, jy
of FE is a question.
Yeah, I understand that, Margaret, uh, from WHO is online.
Margaret is online. I see her here. You have a question for WHO? Yeah,
go ahead.
Just a quick one on the press release that
just released this morning
regarding the widespread overuse of antibiotics during the covid pandemic,
I was wondering if
Margaret
could you just specify apart from
the resistance phenomenon,
what
is the harm that you are talking in the press, release the harm for people who are
who are not in need of antibiotics but did receive
what was the issue with them receiving this thing. And can you
specify across regions? I understand that it's not the same in
the different
regions. So of course I'm interested in Europe,
Margaret, Over to.
Yeah, sure. Jeremy. Yeah, indeed.
This comes from our database from several years of, uh, clinical,
uh, material collected from, uh, hospitals.
And it certainly indicates that there was quite a variation across regions.
A region that was
we were reported greatest use over 70% was in afro.
Uh, euro started higher and then fell lower.
Um, that and the Western Pacific region had the lowest use,
but they were all much higher than you would expect to expect or want to see,
because the only use time you would use antibiotics when you've
got a viral infection is if you had a secondary proven,
uh,
bacterial infection that was sensitive to those antibiotics.
So in other words, they were not being used to appropriately. And if you are the harm.
The main harm, of course,
is that if you are using antibiotics, uh, you're unnecessarily.
You're increasing the likelihood of antimicrobial resistance to those
particular antibiotics so that when you do need them
for your bacterial infection, they are no longer so useful.
But of course, every any individual can have allergic reactions,
or they can have a response to, uh, a medication.
Uh, that's untoward.
So if you give somebody a medication that they don't actually need,
you are always exposing them to an unnecessary risk.
Every time you treat a a person for any illness with any medication,
AAA doctor will balance.
Will this medication do the job and,
uh,
prevent whatever the disease is and is that a
more important outcome than any of the potential risks?
Follow
up.
Just how do you explain this?
I mean, after so many years of campaign, at least in Europe,
regarding the use of antibiotics and all the medics were aware of this thing.
How do you explain that?
75%. That's the number. 75% of people received antibiotics in hospitals.
So is it the effect of surprise? How do you
How do you explain that? And how many
years of prevention have we lost in just two years? Three years of pandemic
A A and I'd only be speculating.
So that's that's a very good question to look at what happened?
Why were these decisions being made? Because the advice was not to do that.
And the advice was very clear. Right from the start, this was a virus.
So it wasn't that that there was any guidance or recommendation that that
that,
uh, clinicians go in this direction.
But perhaps because people were dealing with something completely new,
they were looking for whatever they thought might be appropriate. But,
uh, that you're quite right. The advice has already always been.
Do not use antibiotics. Unless for a proven bacterial infection
that's sensitive to that particular antibiotic.
Thank you for that clarification. Margaret. Do we have, uh,
any other questions on this for Margaret?
No, I don't see. That's OK. So thank you for chiming in on this important note.
Uh,
just a couple of last announcements from me before we wrap up this press briefing,
Uh, as usual, just to highlight the treaty body meetings, human rights treaty,
body meetings
next week, the Committee Against Torture on Wednesday morning,
we, uh, review the report of North Macedonia. That's the first of May.
And the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination
will close this afternoon,
its 112th session after having reviewed Mexico, San Marino,
Albania, Qatar and Moldova
and press conferences. There are two. I'm going to flag
both on Tuesday, the 30th of April. This coming Tuesday in
this room, following this press briefing at noon,
we'll have Philippe Lazzarini who, as you know, is U NRW, A's commissioner general
who will be updating you on the situation in the occupied Palestinian territory.
He will be here
for briefings, and he's taking time to brief you 12 noon on Tuesday, the 30th.
Later in the day.
On Tuesday at 4 p.m. We'll have an update on
the humanitarian situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Speaker is Bruno Le
Mary
UN, resident coordinator and humanitarian coordinator,
who will be speaking with you here at 4 p.m. on DRC.
That's all I have. If you have questions for me, Christian, you have a question.
Go ahead.
Yes. Sorry. That was a very quick one for Margaret.
Can you tell us at what time on Monday, the pandemic treaty?
Uh, negotiations will resume.
And what is the expected, uh, finish of that round of negotiations? Thank you.
Thank
you. I
don't have an
Sorry, I
I'm OK. Yeah, go ahead. Sorry, Margaret.
I don't have an exact, but they normally resume
in the morning. Nine ish tenish and they go all day.
The end.
We want this to be ready for the World Health Assembly, which, as you know,
starts at the end of May.
So that's really
the the the timeline they're on. It's a very fierce timeline,
but I, I can't give you anything tighter than that.
Fair enough. Ok, thank you, Margaret, for the questions. Now
on that note.
Uh, I wish you a good afternoon and a good weekend and see you here on Tuesday. Thanks.